Republicans debate how tight border should be

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
Republicans debate how tight border should be
By Kathy Kiely, USA TODAY
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-04-28-gop-immigration_x.htm

SAN DIEGO — In an isolated canyon known as Smuggler's Gulch, about 15 miles south of this city's downtown, a man with a wan smile and a grimy baseball cap peeked over the 10-foot-high wall that divides the USA from Mexico. He said his name was Hector Guevara. In slightly accented English, he amiably answered the questions of the startled journalists below.

A Border Patrol vehicle drives along the U.S./Mexican border.
By Matt York, AP

They were waiting for several members of Congress to show up for a news conference. Guevara was waiting for something else.

"I need the opportunity to trespass," he said. Guevara's goal was to get back to his wife and two daughters in Los Angeles and the construction job he held until immigration authorities raided his workplace. "Eleven bucks for one hour is good."

Guevara and the rusty metal barrier that he and a friend were trying to scale are at the center of a debate raging 2,200 miles away in the nation's capital. In Southern California, the border wall divides two nations; in Washington, it marks a fault line in the Republican Party.

(seems to me about 3 rolls of razor wire would be a lot cheaper and less scalable than this fence. Dd)

President Bush says he supports efforts to secure the nation's border, but he also wants to permit workers like Guevara who came here illegally but have families and employers who depend on them in the USA to become legal "guest workers."

'Real ID' addresses security issues

Republican leaders have attached the Real ID Act of immigration proposals, including the border fence, to an emergency bill that would provide funding for troops in Iraq. A look at some of the provisions:

Driver's licenses: States would have three years to create counterfeit-proof cards. The plan is aimed at preventing people illegally in the USA from boarding airplanes. The National Governors Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures say the deadline is impossible to meet.
Asylum: People seeking asylum in the USA would have to demonstrate that they are victims of persecution. This provision is an attempt to put an end to people gaming the system. National Conference of Catholic Bishops spokesman Kevin Appleby says it would send legitimate asylum seekers "back to their persecutors."




To other Republicans, including four congressmen who hosted the news conference in Smuggler's Gulch, Guevara represents an argument for tighter border security, even if it means overriding local environmental agencies. "In a time of war, lots of laws are waived," Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., says.

On Capitol Hill at the moment, Bush's Republican critics are in the driver's seat. Legislation that Congress appears poised to send Bush within the next few weeks would permit the Border Patrol to fortify the last 3 miles of the 14-mile barrier that divides San Diego and Tijuana, the two largest cities on the U.S.-Mexican border.

The last 3 miles run near a network of federal, state and county parks known as the Tijuana Estuary. The makeshift barrier of upended landing mats snakes over dusty mesas and down steep canyons to an end deep in the riptide zone of the Pacific Ocean. The ending is just past a picnic area that former first lady Pat Nixon once dedicated as a friendship park between the two nations.

Even those who decry the wall as a monument of fear, such as Christian Ramirez of the American Friends Service Committee, admit that it has been effective.

Filling the gulch

When construction on the barrier began in the early 1990s, illegal border crossings were so numerous here that the California Highway Patrol erected signs warning motorists to watch out for desperate families running across highways. Border Patrol apprehensions in the region have dropped from a peak of 500,000 annually to 138,000 last year. The neighborhood where Ramirez grew up near the border "was an area of great conflict," he says. "Now we have relative tranquility."

To facilitate construction and better seal off the area, the Border Patrol wants to lop off the tops of mesas and dump 2 million cubic yards of dirt into Smuggler's Gulch. It would make the jobs of border agents easier and safer. In 2002, Border Patrol agent Catherine Hill was killed when her Jeep fell off a steep embankment at Smuggler's Gulch.

But the California Coastal Commission contends that all the earth moving would minimally enhance border security while threatening to choke the Tijuana Estuary, an internationally recognized wetland, with sediment. The legislation Congress is considering would allow the Department of Homeland Security to override the Coastal Commission's objections and make its ruling exempt from court review.

U.S. Rep. Bob Filner, a Democrat who represents the district where the wall is located, is against the Border Patrol's plans. California's Republican governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, has expressed misgivings. But Hunter, Ed Royce and Randy Cunningham, three Republican congressmen from neighboring San Diego districts, are pushing legislation that would allow the Border Patrol to override the Coastal Commission's objections. It's part of a package of border security measures known as "Real ID," because it also contains provisions that would require states to produce counterfeit-proof driver's licenses.

President Bush says he'll sign the bill, even though it has become a rallying point for people opposed to his guest-worker plan.

Immigration split

At a gathering on Capitol Hill this week, dozens of people wearing "Real ID" buttons cheered as several Republican congressmen criticized the president's plan, which they say would amount to rewarding lawbreakers. "It's amnesty lite," Rep. J.D. Hayworth, R-Ariz., said.

Among the speakers at the event were leaders of the Minutemen, an Arizona citizens group that has been conducting armed patrols to stop illegal immigration at the state's border with Mexico.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., demanded that Bush apologize for calling the group's members "vigilantes."

One key Senate supporter of President Bush's guest-worker plan, fellow Texan John Cornyn, argued this month for holding up action on Real ID until its provisions could be considered as part of a larger immigration proposal. Cornyn, who chairs the Senate subcommittee on immigration, said he hopes to have comprehensive immigration legislation ready for Senate floor action this summer.

But House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican who authored the Real ID Act, is insisting it be attached to a must-pass bill that would provide funds for troops in Iraq. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., considers the immigration proposals "a terrible piece of legislation" but says Democrats won't be able to vote against the bill because of the troop funding.

The president and his critics are motivated by the same statistic: More than 10 million people are living illegally in the country, according to the Pew Hispanic Center. Despite post-9/11 security enhancements, illegal entries don't seem to have stopped.

In a sense, the Arizona Minutemen are a byproduct of the San Diego wall: As fewer illegal immigrants are caught crossing the Southern California border, the figures in Arizona have shot up. The Border Patrol's Tucson office reported 491,771 apprehensions last year. In 2000, the figure was 616,346. That compares with 227,529 in 1995.

Conservatives such as Tancredo are angry that Bush has funded only one-tenth of the new Border Patrol agents that Congress has authorized. They're even angrier that Bush is considering the guest-worker program.

Cornyn and other Bush allies in Congress argue that deporting a population rivaling that of Pennsylvania isn't practical.

The president says it's time to bring "millions of hardworking men and women out of the shadows."

Other members of his party see the issue differently. "The president's a great president," says Cunningham, who represents San Diego's northern suburbs. "But I disagree on this."
 
Guevara's goal was to get back to his wife and daughters in Los Angeles and the construction job he held until immigration authorities raided his workplace. "Eleven bucks for one hour is good."

Lemme guess.......the workplace is raided, the illegals recycled back across the border only to come back at a later date, and no legal sanctions against the employer. :fire: $ 11.00 per hour pretty much sums up the real problem. :banghead:

Standing Wolf,

:D
 
Beerslurpy, it's not that these are the jobs that people don't want. It's the jobs that Americans want, but don't want to actually do the job when they get it. My thing is, I don't like having millions of illegals in the country, but we might not have as big a problem if Americans worked just a little bit harder. Because if some illegal immigrant is willing to work twice as hard for the same amount of money, who would you hire?

I think as Americans we're shooting ourselves in the foot when it comes to the jobforce. :banghead: But then again, that's just my opinion, so take it for what it's worth. :D
 
To give credit where credit's due, Bush makes me glad I voted for Badnarik last November.

I voted Libertarian where ever I could on my ballot. Except for the big one. I really wish I had checked Badnarik's name instead of Bush's. At the time, Missouri was 'close enough' in the polls, I thought Bush needed every vote he could get, and I did not want to see Kerry win! Turns out all those polls were way wrong, so I should have gone with my Big L votes.

In 2008, I definitely will!
 
Bush and Kerry both made me want to vomit, so I voted for Badnarik. I foresaw that both Kerry and Bush would stick it to us over in the next four years and I didnt want to have to admit I had a part in it.

The amazing thing about Bush and Kerry was not the minor things they disagreed on, but the statist BS they were both in full agreement on. They both fully supported the war on drugs, the patriot act, the senseless war in iraq, permitting illegal immigration, big govt and taxes, etc.

Badnarik would have been a breath of fresh air. I would have been happy if he had won one small state or even thrown a battleground state like Perot did. Just something to put the libertarian agenda on the radar.
 
Conservatives such as Tancredo are angry that Bush has funded only one-tenth of the new Border Patrol agents that Congress has authorized. They're even angrier that Bush is considering the guest-worker program.

Bush is either corrupt as hell and on the take from the Mexicans, or he feels that it is the "Christian" thing to do in letting millions of illegals swarm into this country. Possibly it is both reasons.
 
Badnarik would have been a breath of fresh air. I would have been happy if he had won one small state or even thrown a battleground state like Perot did. Just something to put the libertarian agenda on the radar.

The Libertarians need a credible, well known candidate to run. Someone like former Senator Bob Smith (R-NH) who now is a Florida domicile.
 
Bush is only spending 1/10 of the $ Congress set aside to protect the US borders because the other 9/10 is being used to secure the borders in Iraq and A-stan.

I hear the US has spent something like 200 billion in Iraq. Think what that would have done for the energy crisis if it had been spent here on research into alternatives to importing foreign oil.


S-
 
Republican leaders have attached the Real ID Act of immigration proposals, including the border fence, to an emergency bill that would provide funding for troops in Iraq. A look at some of the provisions:

Solution to an open border problem? Gut the Constitution a little more, trim a few more privacy laws, increase Big Brother, and oh yea, demand amnesty for the illegals. :confused:
 
Wait, you guys want a Libertarian President who would presumably enact their Open Border policy, but you complain about "illegal aliens"? :confused:

Well, under a Libertarian administration there would not be any "illegal" aliens as all would be welcomed. :D

beer, Americans will not work because: 1. they can make far more than $11 an hour sitting on the couch watching television, 2. hard work is not a part of their culture anymore.
 
Bush is either corrupt as hell and on the take from the Mexicans, or he feels that it is the "Christian" thing to do in letting millions of illegals swarm into this country. Possibly it is both reasons.

Not to give GW too much credit, but both illegal immigrant labor and free trade are slight of hand ways to both create unheard of profits as well as avoid inflation. The immigrants are today's answer to slave labor.

It would seem that too few are genuinely concerned about the long term effects. To suddenly change that status quo would disrupt the economy and possibly tank someones precious stock investments.

To say that jobs cannot be filled seems like declaring the obvious untrue. If you offer to pay a fair wage in sync with the general economy, of course there will be applicants. Everywhere you look there are people desperate to get work.

A couple factors that create too many people that are virtually unemployable are education, alcohol, drugs, marijuana, and no work ethic. Perhaps using immigrants is an easy out to dealing with social problems. Long term though, there is a growing population of people who need assistance and social services. These are not individuals. They have families whether affordable or not. A social program should never stop protecting and creating employment and employables as an effort in everyone's best interest.
 
"2. hard work is not a part of their culture anymore"

Regardless of what they are paid I know many, many native born Americans (AKA citizens of the US) that work their a-- off. Two jobs, low pay all the stuff conventional wisdom says isn't happening.

El T your comment fits in the same slot with "state the same propaganda often enough and long enough and people will start believing it." That's a bit harsher than I wanted to come off but something along those lines.

S-
 
I voted Libertarian where ever I could on my ballot. Except for the big one. I really wish I had checked Badnarik's name instead of Bush's. At the time, Missouri was 'close enough' in the polls, I thought Bush needed every vote he could get, and I did not want to see Kerry win! Turns out all those polls were way wrong, so I should have gone with my Big L votes.

In 2008, I definitely will!

As if you would like the LP answer to this problem. Show me where border control is even in the vocabulary other than to rule it out. This is a get-real problem that needs get-real answers.
 
At least they want to end welfare and the War on (some) Drugs. Open borders wouldn't be as bad with those things gone. And it's not like the R & D's are doing anything about it...
 
Actually, the R&Ds *do* advocate open borders. They just use euphamisms such as "Guest Worker Program" to describe their actions. Perhaps the LP can be persuaded to reform their platform concerning immigration issues.
Biker
 
At least they want to end welfare and the War on (some) Drugs. Open borders wouldn't be as bad with those things gone. And it's not like the R & D's are doing anything about it...

All fine, but don't misdirect. LP does not have any answer for the border problem, particularly in regard to terrorist traffic, not meaning to suggest that it is all about terrorism.
 
I doubt any border solution will affect terrorism. They are better funded and motivated than illegals, and they always have the option of comming in legally. All any closed border idea could due is close the flood gates, not seal every leak.
 
LT,

The Libertarian "open borders" is based on the the removal of government entitlements to control immigration. A lot of government programs have to be shut down before an open borders policy as envisioned by Libertarians, is implemented.
 
Beerslurpy, it's not that these are the jobs that people don't want. It's the jobs that Americans want, but don't want to actually do the job when they get it. My thing is, I don't like having millions of illegals in the country, but we might not have as big a problem if Americans worked just a little bit harder. Because if some illegal immigrant is willing to work twice as hard for the same amount of money, who would you hire?

This situation is the direct result of the Feds not enforcing the law. Yes, there are lazy Americans as well as motivated aliens. That does not justify the Feds a) passing the current immigration laws, and b) failing to enforce them.

If they did enforce them here is what would happen:
Illegal aliens wouldn't be able to get hired. To fill the jobs, employers would have to hire Americans. Many of those Americans would be lazy and not perforn thier jobs. They would (should) be fired. These lazy Americans would only be able to find jobs that paid less money, thereby driving the price of labor down. Motivated Americans would not be fired, and would retain the higher paying jobs. Due to the downward pressure on labor costs, these Americans would benefit from lower priced goods as well.

The lack of any workers to fill any job (skilled or unskilled) would drive the wages for that particular job up. If it is driven high enough, employers could apply for a H1B work visa and bring in a LEGAL immigrant to fill the position. These LEGAL immigrant would be screened so as to prevent a terrorist from entering, he/she would pay taxes, and would make enough money to pay their share for health care, schools etc. In short, they would quickly become citizens (good).

What we have now is nothing short of slavery (bad).
 
The libertarians are supply-siders on the immigration problem. They only support open borders within the framework of "no more handouts."

Americans are still plenty hardworking. There are tons of people here working for minimum wage who would love 11 dollars an hour. I make a bit more than 11 an hour, but I am plenty hardworking myself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top