Review of an Al Qaeda training tape

Status
Not open for further replies.

DMK

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
8,868
Location
Over the hills and far, far away
I recently had the opportunity to conduct a detailed review of a captured Al Qaeda training tape.
My impressions:

The tape was apparently produced for Al Qaeda internal use and did not appear to be an external propaganda production.

The tape showed Al Qaeda operatives engaging in a number of training exercises including small arms firing ranges, live-fire room entry, and numerous mixed live-fire/role-player type of scenarios.

Scenarios included: Assassinations, Kidnappings, Bombings, and Small unit raids on various types of targets. The training depicted in these scenarios was clearly for export according to an intelligence expert that commented on the tape. "None of these training scenarios depicts the type of fighting that Al Qaeda engages in within Afghanistan."

Detailed planning, diagramming and walk-through's followed by live-fire exercises were the norm.

There were a lot of role playing, scenario type of interactions.

The role players made aggressive moves simulating resistance at various points throughout the scenarios. All such resistance was met with immediate and brutal countermeasures by the terrorists. There was no presumed compliance on the part of the terrorists.

The effort to produce detail and realism in training was impressive.

These people are using extremely effective training methods!

The following points were seen REPEATEDLY and ROUTINELY throughout the training exercises:

1. Use of standard military small unit tactics with multiple elements. (Assault, Security and Support elements)

2. Coordination with sub-elements via hand-held FM radios.

3. Use of pick-up trucks by the assault element to conduct raids/assassinations (shooters concealed in bed of truck).

4. Use of Motorcycles by the security element (as well as in the historical role as a shooting platform for drive by shootings/assassinations.)

5. Use of explosives upon withdrawal from the objective.

6. Use of vehicle horn to signal withdrawal (and initiation of explosives.)

7. Detailed planning and rehearsal of all actions.

8. Exercise of prisoner handling procedures. >From initial contact, to search and control, to execution of prisoners. Role players could be heard begging not to be killed (IN ENGLISH). Terrorists practiced commands in English also.

9. Multiple man room entries. Typically one or two, 2-man teams that assumed a back to back position near the center of the room.

10. Distraction devices used prior to room entry. Fuse lit devices (improvised?)

11. Multiple breach points into structures and into individual rooms.

12. All scenarios were practiced live-fire. Including those that involved role players. Paper targets and role players were interspersed in the same scenarios. (The terrorists showed good muzzle awareness and control.)

The weapons handling was NOT haphazard. All terrorist operatives carried and fired their weapons using the same techniques.

Some specific weapons handling idiosyncrasies are:

1. Handguns were carried in high ready.

2. Long guns (AK variants) were carried and fired rotated 90 degrees (ejection port up)

Specific scenarios included:

1. Targeting of law enforcement officers in ambush/assassinations.

Faked disabled vehicle with shooters concealed in trunk of car or bed of truck. When officer stops his vehicle behind "disabled vehicle" assault is initiated by driver blowing horn. Target was first engaged with rifle fire from the vehicle, terrorists then debussed to administer "coup de grace" at close range. An explosive device was thrown into the LE vehicle on exfiltration. This was one of a number of scenarios that were shown first as a diagram and explanation, then progressing to dry fire walk through and finally to a live-fire exercise. Target location was shown as a 6 lane divided highway with the terrorist vehicle located just prior to the exit/cloverleaf (to allow multiple exfiltration routes and security overview.) There aren't any such highways in Afghanistan and damn few in the Middle East. In one iteration of this scenario the security/overwatch element was exercised firing on possible responding LEOs.

2. Residential assassination.

Innocuous looking person (weapon concealed) knocks on door of residence. Stands in view of peephole and answers question from resident through closed door. When resident opens door terrorist draws and fires, emptying weapon into victim.

3. Assassination on golf course.

Target was on the green (at the pin/flag.) A Rocket Propelled Grenade (RPG) was fired at a vehicle adjacent to the green (VIP security element?) to initiate the hit. Target was then engaged with rifle fire.

4. Two and four-man live-fire room entry (2-man back to back technique) with target discrimination (shoot/no shoot targets).

5. Raid on compound (Kidnapping).

One person taken. Initiated with RPG. Initiation was when Guard Shack was taken out with grenades. Primary target building was engaged with RPG. Primary target building was entered through multiple breach points (through explosive breach of wall and through windows.) Exfiltration was by truck with motorcycle security element in overwatch positions.

6. Drive up kidnapping of target walking down the street.

7. Use of tunnels/storm drains/sewers for infiltration and exfiltration during raids.

8. Rappelling from roof of building to make entry on upper floors was shown on more than one occasion.

9. Motorcycle drive-by target practice. Shooter stands up on rear pegs and extends arms over driver. Excellent muzzle awareness and control.

10. Grenades thrown into second story windows by motorcycle drive-bys.

MULTIPLE SCENARIOS/EXERCISES involved raids on buildings with a large number of occupants (school or office building?)

These raids followed a standard pattern:

1. Covert/surreptitious entry into building and movement to initial points. (Rifles hidden on persons and in bags/cases carried into building.)

2. Initiation with extreme violence of action. Any resisters are shot.

3. Immediate positive control and search of prisoners. Any resisters, or anyone they don't like the look of, are shot.

4. Segregation of prisoners into manageable groups. (Explosives were displayed to gain psychological dominance over prisoners.)

5. Movement of selected prisoners in small groups to the roof where terrorists posture and make statements for the press/cameras.

6. Prisoners executed one-by-one in front of the press/cameras.

7. All scenarios involving prisoners ended in execution of the prisoners and none included a plan for exfiltration of the terrorists. They plan to kill the prisoners and to die in place.

The major take home lesson here is that although the enemy is known to be seeking the ability and opportunity to use weapons of mass destruction and of an unconventional nature, such as hijacked airliners, they are also spending a lot of time training to carry out attacks the old-fashioned way. Attacks executed by small groups of dedicated personnel equipped with little more than small arms.

There is information to the effect that the "perfect day" as seen by Al Qaeda would combine attacks designed to produce the maximum number of casualties with attacks that would give them the opportunity to get "face time" on the news channels to deliver their rhetoric. For maximum effect these attacks would take place nearly simultaneously at multiple geographically separate locations.

We need to address, in training and in personal preparation, the differences between a typical criminal victimization and a terrorist incident in terms of early recognition and appropriate response. I.E. The typical bank robbery vs. finding yourself in the middle of a terrorist attack on a "financial institution" (as per the recent FBI warning.)

If you find yourself in the middle of one of these attacks, there will not be time for the SWAT team to intervene on your behalf. Compliance will buy you only a very little time. If you are identified as a potential problem to the terrorists you will be shot! (They are training to spot Law Enforcement, Security and Corrections Officers as well as armed citizens.) If, by feigned compliance, you make it through the first cut you can expect to be physically restrained and then controlled with threats to the rest of your group and to the other groups. "We will blow up the women and children in the next room if any of you do not do exactly as we say!" Your ultimate fate, if you do not resist, is to be ritually executed in front of the television cameras.

In my opinion the best time to act is most likely to be at the initiation of the attack. Once the terrorists are consolidating on the objective it will be very difficult to take effective action. You must plan on providing effective resistance at the first opportunity! Shoot, move and communicate. Seek cover, use your weapon as required. Attempt to acquire a better weapon system at the first opportunity (do you know how to place an AK into operation?)

Keep in mind that before any terrorist action there are many opportunities to interrupt their cycle by detecting their pre-mission activities. This is where we all can be of assistance. Pay attention to what is going on around you as you go about your daily business. Investigate and report any unusual or suspicious activity that you observe (note vehicle make and model, license plates, personnel descriptions etc.)

John Holschen
Insights Training Center, Inc

From Mike Hargreaves, Brit Special Ops and world-class trainer. I agree with everything except his advice to get rid of those "big bullets." Can't help it, must be in my genes! ;=)

Dave,

Please note in the attack on the kindergarten, the terminology, "gave chase, and killed him with gunshots" no one spoke of arrest, no one said "alleged" "focus" 100% focus, to kill, the only solution, give chase, running, firing whilst running, both hands up, gun bouncing, terrorist hit, turning, trying to fire back, falling, shooter continuing to shoot, terrorist on the ground, he is still being shot!! the pistol was a Semi auto, must have been, probably a 9mm, the gun was in all probability emptied into the head of the terrorist, blood would be on the shoes and pant legs of this children's defender!! America! are you up to this? no you are not! you are too bloody nice! too soft!! these people know this!! this same scenario has been played before in Israel, many times, take it to the RANGE Run, gun up, shoot as you approach targets strung out in line in front of the shooter, end with a ground target, a melon, a squash, whatever, shoot the gun dry, scream like a mad person, reload, seek out hidden targets!!

WEAPON SELECTION. Hicap magazines, 9mm, at least one spare Magazine on belt, two better, night sights.

Ammo: good hollow points in pistol, and first replacement Mag: last Mag: of the three. mil: spec: hardball.

HOLSTER. On belt concealed, always, in house, in office, in Cafe, in Church, always!! you cannot drink to excess, ever again, you dress armed, you think armed, you go armed, always.

Lose the love affair with "Big Bullets" you need lots of bullets,you need the lightest effective round, least possible recoil, hits count, misses with any calibre do not!! cancel the ban on hicap magazines, all concealed carry courses must have live fire, must teach shooting from chair, car, ladder!, where ever you can be.

GET READY AMERICA, OR GET DEAD.

MIKE HARGREAVES.
http://www.geocities.com/equipmentshop/gunshield.htm


Wow. Imagine if these guys were activated across America? Four of these guys storm the office building that you happen to be visiting. How effective is your CCW going to be? Apparently, you have little chance by yourself against these guys unless you are just darn lucky and if you do nothing, you will be executed anyway.


Edited: Missed the part at the end about the kindergarten and CCW.
 
Last edited:
Now that is some scary stuff right there. These aren't gangbangers who can't hit the broadside of a barn and have no organization. Plus with no plan to exfiltrate their plans are extremely easy to complete. There is virtually no stopping someone who wants to kill you if they can accept that they will also die in the process. This is just all the more reason for more people to get a permit to carry and make sure they carry at all times. Never know when something like that could happen. :uhoh:
 
Why would they do this? No bang for buck. Why not have the sleepers which may soon activate hit soft targets with explosives like in Madrid?

With an AK they can kill what 8 to 12? But with a dirty bomb or a VX gas shell, hundreds if not thousands, no? Even a UPS truck turned into a rolling claymore would kill far more than a team armed with Type 56s.
 
....(They are training to spot Law Enforcement, Security and Corrections Officers as well as armed citizens.).....
Finally get on the same page as regular LE, but the wrong guys are doing it...bummer. Good thing I go armed all the time, home or out....wife too....bank online, direct deposit, Mom and Pop stores, odd hours, the usual. Their favorite targets are not the places I frequent....
 
Why would they do this? No bang for buck. Why not have the sleepers which may soon activate hit soft targets with explosives like in Madrid?

With an AK they can kill what 8 to 12? But with a dirty bomb or a VX gas shell, hundreds if not thousands, no? Even a UPS truck turned into a rolling claymore would kill far more than a team armed with Type 56s.

for the same reason they crashed airplaces into the towers...its all psychological. look at how much trouble they went through in preparing for the 9/11 attack. it would have been much easier to set off a bomb in the middle of a city but it wouldnt have had the lasting effects that 9/11 did.
 
Why would they do this? No bang for buck. Why not have the sleepers which may soon activate hit soft targets with explosives like in Madrid?

Actually, I'm very surprised that they haven't (yet) just walked into a NY Street flooded with people on a Holiday where everyone is out walking/buying gifts/sightseeing, etc in a group of 3 or 4 people with AK's and extra mags and just opened up. I figure 3 guys with 30 rnd mags 10 feet apart in the street could take down 40-60 fleeing sheep, no sweat. Would take LE too long to respond, and people would be abandoning vehicles to further impede their arrival.

Ugh, I have to wonder if maybe I shouldn't be saying this??? :uhoh:
 
With an AK they can kill what 8 to 12? But with a dirty bomb or a VX gas shell, hundreds if not thousands, no? Even a UPS truck turned into a rolling claymore would kill far more than a team armed with Type 56s.

Remember the theater in Moscow?

These guys need an event that captures media coverage as LONG as possible. They need a building full of people that they can sporadically kill everytime the cameras start to think about pointing somewhere else. Ultimately they want to be front page news EVERY DAY for as long as possible.
 
The camera is their force multiplier. I hope our counter terrorist training includes a large dolop of controlling the media. Any event no matter how small or ineffective will be blown up beyond recognition by an overly aggressive, ill informed, and arrogant media.

Schools! I hope we train for schools being hit. That is the one place where you have large numbers of easily managed victims who are defenseless. AQ has specifically claimed the right to kill up to 2 million American children. The only thing they haven't done to telegraph their intentions is a billboard on Times Square.
 
I went through a Anti Terrorism Officer course and saw this tape. I was supprised at how well the training was conducted. I brought back copies and case studies on attacks that had already happened and gave classes to my unit. I volunteered to assist in training the unit with handguns and shotguns (everyone is trained with the M16) for home protection. I urged our commander to push for us to CCW, and you know what everyone said,......... "your just paranoid after going to that class" and that was only about 6 months after 9/11. Most people prefer to live in lala land rather than be prepared and aware of their surroundings. Its scary when you find out how unobservent the masses really are.
 
Amazing.

Both Mike Hargreaves and Massad Ayoob were present at the local IDPA match in Orlando on the 4th.

Conveniently I missed it, one of my friends with his single stack Kimber BEAT Mas.
 
El Tejon,

I do recall that John Muhammed and Lee Malvo caused quite a stir with their sniper attacks. People were afraid to be in the DC/Maryland area! And those guys weren't even "terrorists" that we usually think of. I don't think it would be a stretch for Al-Queda to try something similar or as mentioned in the initial post.
 
De Ja Vu is all I have to say. Last night before I went to bed I was thinking about Al Quieda since I had just finished watching a TV show about them on TLC. I was thinking the same things they just mentioned. Imagine if they had coordinated attacks schools across the nation and then followed up with attacks on all major shopping areas.

It doesn't matter if they eventually end up dead, the main point of terrorism is not to inflict casualties but to instill fear to the masses. Just think in 1 day they attack schools/shopping areas, everyone will be afraid to step out of their house. Tell me that won't hurt the economy. I wonder how the anti's would react to that? Call for MORE gun control? Or will people finally wake up to reality and start arming themselves?
 
Why would they do this? No bang for buck. Why not have the sleepers which may soon activate hit soft targets with explosives like in Madrid?

Like someone else said, the effect is psychological. After September 11, a lot of America said, "well, I work in a small business" or "I don't live anywhere near a big population center." The traditional feeling goes something like "My town has 12,000 people and the biggest building is four stories high. Why would they bother with us?"

The point of these attacks is to instill fear on a large scale basis and show that no one is safe anywhere. Remember the DC snipers? Imagine hundreds of them spread across America, none of whom cared about being caught, combined with coordinated attacks on locations that are important to daily American life. Schools, banks, Wal-marts, grocery stores, dry cleaners... They could have a good portion of America locked inside afraid to leave their homes.
 
Vodka, hundreds of member of The Base doing this?:eek: Can't see it. How do you coorindate such an enormous attack without tipping off the feds? How do you support such a number until the day of action?

Why waste high-dedication resources running around plugging soccermommies and Eloi in the Virginia 'burbs? No, save it for a haymaker. Something just like Madrid--soft target, big punch, timed right before an election to get rid of their biggest threat via the ballot box, Preident Bush. Small team could make a big mess and let media and political opponents take out Bush.

They don't want a town of 12K, they want New York City, with Miami a second choice (D.C. maybe third).
 
Quote:
_________

Why would they do this? No bang for buck. Why not have the sleepers which may soon activate hit soft targets with explosives like in Madrid?
________

It would seem to be a very effective way to bring the gun control (and confiscation) issue to the forefront. I would speculate that a few of these scenarios would go a long way to help those who want to disarm American citizens. Of course, it wouldn't do anything to disarm criminals and terrorists.
 
I went through a Anti Terrorism Officer course and saw this tape. I was supprised at how well the training was conducted. I brought back copies and case studies on attacks that had already happened and gave classes to my unit. I volunteered to assist in training the unit with handguns and shotguns (everyone is trained with the M16) for home protection. I urged our commander to push for us to CCW, and you know what everyone said,......... "your just paranoid after going to that class" and that was only about 6 months after 9/11. Most people prefer to live in lala land rather than be prepared and aware of their surroundings. Its scary when you find out how unobservent the masses really are.
fgr39, that's rich. I'm assuming that you are in either Law Enforcement or Natl. Guard. If I'm correct then this is really, really sad. You and your fellow colleagues are the very people who are supposed to be taking this the most seriously. Isn't that what Bush/Ridge's "Homeland Defense(tm)" is all about? :scrutiny:

Good on you for learning and trying to get the team prepared, but I for one am glad I live in a state where I can go about my daily business armed and prepared to protect my own self. :(

Darn government ain't worth the taxes that pay for it. :rolleyes:
 
Vodka, hundreds of member of The Base doing this? Can't see it. How do you coorindate such an enormous attack without tipping off the feds? How do you support such a number until the day of action?

A couple hundred isn't that big of a number... I mean, even if it's 500, that means all they need is 10 people in each state that really hate America and are willing to lose their lives (if necessary) over it. There are 300 million people here and at least as many guns. A couple hundred doesn't sound that big in comparison. As for support--they're already here, they already have regular jobs and families. They're already trained, and they already have their weapons.

I don't want to sound like some whackjob who thinks there's an assassin behind every 7-11 counter, but this is something I'm really, really paranoid about. My girlfriend is (a very liberal) muslim and I'm typing this from the room I'm renting from her parents. Every relative and friend of theirs that I've met, save one, has been absolutely welcoming. But all it takes is one...

Honestly, I think the only reason something like this hasn't happened yet is because Al Qaeda realizes America (especially America under President Bush) isn't going to sit around and take it. I think they also realize that they've run out of scapegoat countries. The next time we get attacked, we're going after Saudi Arabia, and that's where all their support and all their money is. If Al Qaeda brings America into Saudi Arabia, they're going to burn every last bridge they still have.

I wouldn't be surprised if it happened somewhere with an unarmed populace, though... *cough* *cough* England *cough* *cough*
 
My take-

"Why would they do this? No bang for buck. Why not have the sleepers which may soon activate hit soft targets with explosives like in Madrid?"

Most Americans who don't live in New York view it as a distant memory already. New York is a place where that terrorism happens, I can't relate since I live in Kansas, Nebraska etc. etc.
If it was me running a terrorist organization where the members don't mind dying, I would have 10 McDonalds AK-47 massacres at noon next Tuesday all across America. That would tell all Americans they aren't safe no matter where they are. The American people would say "why can't we be protected from something like this?" Give the terrorists what they want!
CT
 
"Why would they do this? No bang for buck. Why not have the sleepers which may soon activate hit soft targets with explosives like in Madrid?"

Tejon, I do expect these sorts of attacks in the USA. If their intention, besides the obvious shock and terror value, is to cause Bush to lose the election the way Aznar lost in Spain.

An "assault rifle" attack (or multiple coordinated attacks) would be fatal to Bush if it happened in October, after the AWB sunsets. If the "assault weapons" were purchased legally by a jihadi sleeper, even better. Better yet, buy them at gun shows over a period of months or years. (Blame it on the "Gun Show Loophole!!!")

The terrorists will attempt to take over a highly defensible landmark (or multiple landmarks at the same time) in order to prolong their propaganda battle on world television. My first guess would be the Seattle Space Needle or a similar tower. The jihadists see such "false prayer towers" as an affront to allah. Once they blast a few rentacops at the bottom, they will go up, and secure the tourist decks. It's almost impossible to conceive of a rescue 1,000 feet up a tower. (Give them 50 caliber rifles and night vision devices, also legally purchased in the USA, to keep SWAT / HRT helos at bay.)

Once in control, with a restaurant and its water tanks for a long siege, the terrorists will begin killing hostages and tossing them out. This type of attack will dominate every moment of world news for days on end. Unlike the Moscow theater, it will not be possible to block TV cameras from filming "the action" as hostages are killed and tossed down from the tower.

The political effect on Bush and the Republicans would be devastating in a way that a bombing would not be, because the entire "assault weapon attack" angle would be blamed squarely on Bush by the liberal media. Bombs go off and are over in a moment, but a long hostage drama with beheadings and "assault rifle" murders would be world class TV drama.

Of course, we could also see anthrax, sarin, bombings etc. But an "assault weapon" attack and prolonged bloody siege would have an incredible media/propaganda fallout, and all of it would be blamed on Bush for not supporting the banning of "assault weapons." The liberal media and the 'rats would absolutely flay him alive, 24/7.

To further twist the knife, bring the assault team in over the Mexican border. Spanish speaking Moroccan terrorists (like the ones behind Madrid) would be perfect. Bush would also be blamed for sending the Army to Iraq, and leaving the borders undefended. ABCNNBCBS would skin Bush alive.

This would set the stage (the jihadist planners would hope) for President Kerry, and a policy of American terror appeasement.
 
Let’s hope there is someone there with a CCW, like me, to put a damper on their efforts. They way this country takes to lies a terrorist action could be used to change the constitution, 2nd amendment, and new laws that would take more freedoms from us.
 
A four man team armed with AKs, for example, would be relying on "surprise, firepower, and violence of action" to carry them through their initial assault until they gain control of the scene.

A single CCW with a powerful pistol could totally take them in counter-surprise, and wound or kill one or two of the assault team. The CCW would probably die, but he might well cause the assault teams primary mission to abort.

We're Americans, dammit, and we don't take this **** lying down like Frenchmen. I for one would draw and fire on them, no matter what, to stop them from attacking a school etc. No matter what.
 
I for one would draw and fire on them, no matter what, to stop them from attacking a school etc. No matter what.

Yeah, but you'd be in trouble for bringing a gun into a School Zone, and then they'd have to throw the book at you for saving children...err....violating the Safe Zone with your deadly bullet hose.

[/sarcasm]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top