Reworking a stock AR15 trigger w/ heat treat info

Status
Not open for further replies.

jester_s1

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Messages
206
Location
Fort Worth, TX
Disclaimer: I'm posting what worked for me and me alone. The information is free and might be worth exactly what you paid for it.

I have had an AR for a while and wanted a lighter, smoother trigger as many if not most do. My only problem is that I'm cheap. The issue with stock triggers is that they have lots of positive angle in the trigger/hammer engagement area that adds to the pull weight. The finish can also be rough too.

It's been covered numerous times online how to recut this angle, so I didn't take any pics for that part. Basically, all I did was stone the nose of the trigger to 90 degrees relative to the pivot hole, then I assembled the trigger and hammer using the holes outside of the rifle to check the fit. I then stoned a slight change in the angle of the hammer hook to match.

The only problem with doing this is that these are case hardened parts, and stoning away that material cuts through the case hardening. That was verified when I reassembled the rifle and dry fired a few times. The trigger felt good for the first 10-15 pulls, then started getting rough and mushy toward the end of the pull because of wear on the soft metal.

So I cleaned up the cuts again and rehardened the metal. I first contacted some heat treating companies to do it but they all made sure to price themselves out of the job due to liability concerns. So I went at it in the backyard. My reasoning was that I will discover a problem when I dry fire the gun if there is one, and if I still haven't hardened it up enough the trigger will get rough and mushy again long before it actually fails and causes doubling.

I packed the hammer and trigger in a steel can (green beans I think) with finely ground oak charcoal that I made on the grill. The can just needs to be big enough that the parts can be surrounded by charcoal and not touching the sides. I filled the can all the way up with charcoal, then sealed it with clay on the open end and put the metal top back on. Good case hardening depends on a no oxygen atmosphere for an extended period of time, so the sealing is the most important part. Then it was time for the heat.

These are the pics of my highly scientific super accurate heating apparatus.

pump.jpg coals.jpg

It's basically a charcoal starter and a camping pump with a piece of steel pipe taped to it. I used to do blacksmithing and learned the basics of fire management and how to judge proper heat, and I knew that a pile of charcoal could get hot enough. The goal was to hold the can at 1700-1800 degrees for two hours. It's ok if it gets too cold during the process. You just extend the time to make sure you get that much time at temp. There will be no carbon migration below critical temp (around 1600) and if it gets up past 1900 things start melting (the can first, then the parts). In low light but not nightime, 1700 is a bright orange color, similar to how a sunrise looks when it's all the way up. The darker the ambient light, the brighter 1700 degrees will look. 2 hours at 1700 degrees should yield around 10 thousandths of surface hardening, which is very close to how these parts are leaving the factory. You maintain that heat by blowing air in from the bottom just like in a blacksmith's forge. You also need to have a small pile of charcoal getting ready to use when you start. Do not add fresh charcoal to the fire. It will suck the heat right out of it and delay the process. Get coals ready to use then drop them in as the fire burns down. Also be very gentle with the can once it's hot. At 1700 degrees, it is as fragile as tissue paper and if you move it around much as you add charcoal it will tear open.

I did the heat, and because of letting the fire burn down too much at one point it took 3 hours total to get the whole 2 hour soak done at heat. I then dumped the whole works out on the grill, and tore the can open and dumped it out in my wife's colander (she wasn't home!). I found that I had damaged the can during the heat by moving it, but I went ahead and seperated everything out and found the hammer and trigger and dropped them straight into my quenching water. I then did a 350 draw in the oven for an hour.

I had to do some very basic polishing to the parts after the process, and then I coated them with CLP since the original phosphate coating was long gone. I've done 100 dry fires so far with no change in the trigger feel. It's a smooth 4 pounds now and perfectly acceptable for my uses. I could get it lower with a reduced hammer spring or with one of the adjusters to remove sear engagement, but it's good enough for me now.

I'd love to hear from anyone else who does this. I can't say it was worth it just from a financial standpoint, because I could have bought the Bushmaster match trigger (trigger only) for about $40 and accomplished the same thing. But it was a fun experiment to do and I have kept all of the stock sear engagement so safety isn't a worry.
 
That definitely sounds like a fun project, one of those situations where it can't hurt to know how it is done, as long as I had a backup plan. ( I don't like taking my only version of something out of commission. If I have a backup, I have no problem tearing apart most anything)
 
Well my backup plan was to buy another stock trigger off gunbroker for a few bucks if this one didn't pan out. I'm impressed with it. The feel is about as good as a stock Weatherby or non-accutrigger Savage. I can live with that.
 
If it works for you, it works. Also you have a safe way to tell if it didn't work.

One of the major improvements instituted at the Springfield Arsenal to prevent catastrophic failures of 1903 bolts was to actually measure the heat-treating temperature of the bolts rather than letting very experienced operators judge them by "color temperature". It turns out the operators could be off by more than 400*.

http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/sid=52952/pid=27119/Product/BROWNELLS_SURFACE_HARDENING_COMPOUND

or

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=119479

Might be a better solution.
 
I knew about the Kasenit before, and you are right. It is a better product for the job. But the practical difference between it and this is time to get the same results. Both methods involve holding the part at temperature to let the carbon migrate. Using the quick method with the compounds gives a very thin case which won't be good enough for this application.
 
The product promos claim otherwise re case depth. Since I have no direct experience with either one I defer to your experience.

I would like to hear about your longer term results as time goes on.

IIRC bone meal charcoal was the preferred medium historically.

regards - DBR
 
You're right about bone meal being the material of choice back in the day. I honestly don't know why it was preferred though. I needed 10-15 thousandths of hardness on the parts for them to hold up, and the instructions for the Kasenit indicate that that takes 30 minutes. It's the same process as using straight carbon (charcoal) except the compounds have other chemicals that encourage the carbon to go into solution with the iron. I don't really understand the chemistry, but I do know that the final product isn't appreciably different assuming both processes are done correctly.
 
Jester, did you get any color out of this process after you polished it? Bone was usually used to provide a source of calcium to "color case harden" small parts.

How were you able to visually monitor the temperature of the parts when they were buried in charcoal in a sealed can buried in a fire?
 
Last edited:
It's the first I've heard

This is the first time I've heard of someone re heat treating AR triggers after a trigger job. I'm I missing something? I've had no problems with my own trigger jobs. 5000 rds and still going strong. I cut the sear engagement area, the disconnect, the back of the hammer and the top of the hammer so it won't cam against the bottom of the bolt and jam. I't about a 4lb pull.
 
KCJ- Color case hardening is a completely different process. The colors come from quenching in a water tank that has air bubbles being blown through it. I wasn't going for beauty here, so all I got was a case of surface hardness.

crossrhodes- With mine, I could see wear within 30 dry fires. I don't believe it would have gotten unsafe for a long time if ever, but the smooth feel didn't last. Maybe yours is made of a harder base metal than mine is. I'm curious about your process. What did you do to the disconnector? And on the hammer, are you talking about taking the spur off? And what about the top of the hammer?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top