Ria .45 acp

Status
Not open for further replies.

stinger 327

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
3,204
I have been hearing good things about this gun and that it's priced right. Has anyone here had any bad experiences with this gun and or good experiences?
Does it shoot good out of the box?
 
Mine took minor tweaking. I am very happy with the gun. It shot OK stock, but in my humble opinion, the recoil spring was weak. I replaced it with one from Wilson Combat, and it shoots much better.

It shot OK with the stock recoil spring, but it was 'slow' to chamber the next round. For the money, I think they are good guns.

I have a few thousand rounds through mine, it is on my night stand. I am sure you will get varied thoughts on the gun.
 
Mine took minor tweaking. I am very happy with the gun. It shot OK stock, but in my humble opinion, the recoil spring was weak. I replaced it with one from Wilson Combat, and it shoots much better.

It shot OK with the stock recoil spring, but it was 'slow' to chamber the next round. For the money, I think they are good guns.

I have a few thousand rounds through mine, it is on my night stand. I am sure you will get varied thoughts on the gun.
Should I get this gun before I get the Sig P-220?
 
My 1911 range beaters are RIA Tactical 5" units, and they are holding up to that duty very well. They do shoot low, and you can either file down the front sight to regulate them or replace the front sight with a shorter unit/replace the rear with a taller unit.
 
RIA has a retro-ish GI-style gov model with fixed sights (the one I have). For not much more, they have what has been described as a significant upgrade in sights and a few other extras. I'm happy with mine, but I've had it only a short time and don't have many rounds through it. The ones that did go through, went without failures.
 
They come with fixed or adjustable sights. I have the RIA Match, which has an adjustable rear sight.

I am unfamiliar with the Sig, so no comment on that.
 
RIA has a retro-ish GI-style gov model with fixed sights (the one I have). For not much more, they have what has been described as a significant upgrade in sights and a few other extras. I'm happy with mine, but I've had it only a short time and don't have many rounds through it. The ones that did go through, went without failures.
How many different models and sizes do they have in .45 ACP?
 
Shoots very well. I can hit golf balls at 75 yards with my handloads and careful aiming.

Keep it clean. Mine decided to shoot 2 or 3 rounds at once when I let it get too dirty.

I replaced the factory grip panels and grip safety and am very happy with it. The grip panels were slick and had no bite and the grip safety had too much bite.

So far, it has functioned well with every type of ammo I've fed it, including SWCs, JHPs, and JRNs. Only problem I've had with ammo is that it will ding up the hollow points and jackets of carry ammo. The feed ramp is not as pretty as I'd like.

It's not a pretty gun, but it is very serviceable, and there is a huge aftermarket available for customization and tweaking.

I like the factory finish, it's dull and non-reflective and seems to soak up oil.
 
I don't remember but does the RIA .45 come with fixed sights?

How many different models and sizes do they have in .45 ACP?

Get busy with Google and you'll find a lot of answers on your own.

Should I get this gun before I get the Sig P-220?

If you get the Sig P220, I doubt you'll be interested in the RIA anymore. The P220 is also ~2x as much as the RIA, so if you're on a budget, you won't be able to afford the RIA for a while after buying the P220.
 
stinger 327 said:
Does it shoot good out of the box?
Yes it does.

I handled several RIA pistols (MilSpec and Tactical models) several years back and did not like the way the slide cycled, felt gritty and catching, somewhat loose and not smooth. Trigger was OK, like most MilSpec 45s.

Fast forward to mid 2011 and I was on a hunt for a 1911 with a shooting friend. I handled and range fired several range rentals and other shooting friends' 1911s (Colts, SAs, Paras, Kimbers, S&Ws, etc.) along with a couple of RIA Tactical models. The RIA Tacticals were just bought by the owners and they felt different than the models I handled in previous years. The slide-to-frame fit was much tighter, slide cycled smoothly and even the trigger felt better.

By the end of the range test, I got the best shot groups off hand at 7-15 yards (dime to quarter size shot groups) with Kimbers. But what surprised me was how well the RIA Tacticals shot - they were surprisingly accurate.

When I failed to get 1 of 200 Dan Wesson PM7s made for California, I decided on a Sig 1911 TacPac ($850) and my friend got the RIA Tactical ($495). Since he was not familiar with 1911s, I offered to strip the pistol for a cleaning and check for any problems. When I took the Tactical model apart, I found that it was nothing like the typical MilSpec models I have worked with in the past. The slide-to-frame fit was comparable to my Sig 1911 and although components lacked higher level of finish and lack of tool marks of Sig 1911, the components fit well and tight. There was no packing grease many posted about RIA and the Tactical model just needed a quick wipe down with Hoppes #9 and generous lubing with BreakFree CLP. Everything became very slick and smooth after the cleaning/lubing. Only thing I suggested to the friend was changing the black front sight to a white/fiber optic sight and offered to polish/lighten the trigger (but recommended he break-in the pistol first with some jacketed rounds).

Since then, we have both shot several thousand rounds of factory jacketed (CCI/Blazer TMJ, PMC FMJ) and Berry's plated RN/Missouri Bullet lead SWC reloads without any issue. When I was developing the reloads using the barrels, I noticed the RIA chamber was more generous and tapered towards the ramp end. Start of rifling/leade was not as short as the Sig barrel and accommodated SWC OAL to 1.265" with .472" taper crimp and fed/chambered without any issues. I suggested Chip McCormick Power Mags and they functioned without any problem (factory magazines actually have worked wells with only a few feed issue when brand new).

As to accuracy, at 7-10 yards, I can't tell the difference in shot groups between the Sig and RIA but at 15-25 yards, Sig produces tighter shot groups (BTW, the Sig is shooting very comparable to Kimbers). I think this may be due to the smoother trigger of the Sig. We may do a light polish job on the RIA trigger and see what happens to the shot groups but I would be very happy with how the RIA has been shooting so far had I bought the pistol.
 
Last edited:
I have about 30k rounds through my RIA tactical that I bought in Jan 2008. I replaced the barrel this past summer as the accuracy was beginning to affect my match scores. I concur with the poster above that said the chambers were generous. My RIA has been awesome and would buy another tomorrow. Check out the 1911forum site, there are lots of RIA lovers over there.
 
First one I got was "out of spec" as the gunsmith put it. A 3.5 inch barrel officer frame model.

One phonecall and three weeks later I had a brandnew one, that the 'smith decided to slick up a bit before shipping my way for free.
So yes, my first one did have to be sent back, but man ... the one they sent back is one amazing little gun. So the lifetime warranty actually works, not that I think I'll need it again.
 
Just picked up my 4th RIA 1911 a couple days ago. This one's a 9mm, the owner had never fired it, decided to go after a different project. My other three are dandies and all .45's, can't wait to shoot this one! I hear the 9mm's are really sweet shooters, the extra weight of the 1911 platform supposedly really softens the lighter recoil of the 9.

The stock RIA grips are kinda lame, but I think they realize that most 1911 owners are going to change the grips anyway. I just happen to have a set of full-size Crimson Trace Lasergrips that have been waiting for a gun to go on.

DSC_0038.jpg

DSC_0040.jpg
 
Just picked up my 4th RIA 1911 a couple days ago. This one's a 9mm, the owner had never fired it, decided to go after a different project. My other three are dandies and all .45's, can't wait to shoot this one! I hear the 9mm's are really sweet shooters, the extra weight of the 1911 platform supposedly really softens the lighter recoil of the 9.

The stock RIA grips are kinda lame, but I think they realize that most 1911 owners are going to change the grips anyway. I just happen to have a set of full-size Crimson Trace Lasergrips that have been waiting for a gun to go on.

View attachment 593869

View attachment 593870
As long as the RIA model has the same feeling as a 1911 in your hands then it is good for the price. I do not own any 1911 style pistol so it would be great to see how it feels and shoots without having to spend 800-1,600 for it.
 
I've put probably a thousand rounds through my Tactical since I bought it, and the only issues I've had were due to my own reloads figuring out powder charges and cartridge lengths. It's fed every bullet profile I've thrown at it, and I can get respectable groups at 15 yards. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another one if I felt I needed it.
 
I LOVE My Rock!!!!
RockIsland.jpg
 
All the 1911s i have are rocks(i am a po blk child lol) a gi a 4in and a tac.
A friend wanted the 4in so after some arm pulling i sold it to him. Goning to buy a new tac in the morn.
My gi i got used now have over 6k in the pipe.
My 4in has over 5k in it, the tac i got new,
Ran all 500 in one sitting nary a problem.

Dont expect any problems with this one
 
All the 1911s i have are rocks(i am a po blk child lol) a gi a 4in and a tac.
A friend wanted the 4in so after some arm pulling i sold it to him. Goning to buy a new tac in the morn.
My gi i got used now have over 6k in the pipe.
My 4in has over 5k in it, the tac i got new,
Ran all 500 in one sitting nary a problem.

Dont expect any problems with this one
I thought they have a 3.5 as a compact and I don't know which one is the full size RIA.45 ACP.
I would probably opt for the full size model.
 
The High Road staff also run a gun/product review website called Shooting Reviews and did a review of the RIA Tactical - http://www.shootingreviews.com/rock-island-armory-1911a1/

Here are some excerpts from the review:

The Goals of the Test


I was trying to answer this question: does RIA make a pistol that’s worth recommending to shooters on a budget?

So the test was this: use the gun for Gunsite’s 250 course, don’t clean it, and see how it performs.

Reliability

This was the part of the test I was most interested in. How will one of the least inexpensive 1911′s on the market hold up to over 1,000 rounds in a week without being cleaned? The answer was “much better than I expected based on what I’ve read about the platform.” The maintenance routine looked something like this:

- Shoot 50 rounds before Gunsite to make sure everything feeds properly.
- Shoot an additional 200 rounds on Monday. Clean the gun Monday night because the cleaning habit is hard to break.
- Shoot an additional 1,200 rounds over the rest of the week, lubing the pistol a bit on Thursday night because I couldn’t stand not to (6 drops of CLP total).

That’s as close as I can remember getting to running a dirty weapon, but the RIA didn’t seem to care at all. I had two malfunctions the entire time. Both were from short-stroking the slide — once because I was working on a new way of manipulating the weapon while under stress, and the second time was at night (again) performing new procedures while (again) under stress.

The pistol had no identifiable reliability issues the entire week.

Not bad for a cheap 1911.

Build Quality:

The build quality was surprisingly good — the Gunsite gunsmith was even impressed. I don’t know how to say this other than “the parts fit well together fairly well.” One item of note: if you look at the photo of the safety above, you can see the pin on the front of the safety. When I swapped the ambi safety for a single-sided the gunsmith ground that pin down so it would fit flush and noted that the steel was stainless rather than something less expensive. Just like higher-end brands do.

Conclusion: would I recommend this to someone looking for a first 1911?


Absolutely. This was reliable, accurate, reasonably full featured, affordable, and only became uncomfortable with extended shooting — much more than casual shooters are likely to engage in. The changes I felt the need to make (grips and safety) cost about $140 in parts and labor, which still makes this considerably cheaper than the STI Trojan we brought along. Now, it’s not as nice a gun, but if you’re looking for a reliable and affordable 1911 I have no qualms with recommending this pistol.
 
The High Road staff also run a gun/product review website called Shooting Reviews and did a review of the RIA Tactical - http://www.shootingreviews.com/rock-island-armory-1911a1/

Here are some excerpts from the review:
Thank for your valuable input and information. Basically there were 3 guns of interest:
1. Para-Ordinance Warthog 10 shot + 1 in chamber Same price as P-220 $800.00+
2. RIA .45 ACP 3.5 inch Compact model equivalent to Warthog in size?
(or maybe full size RIA model in .45 ACP.).
3. Sig P-220 .45 ACP SA/DA not of 1911 design but one ready to go in chamber in DA mode and of great quality but at double the price at $800.00+
Decisions Decisions
 
I have the full size Tactical model. I have 4,000 rounds downrange. 3,800 of those are lead semi-wadcutter reloads. The rest are hollow points. Took about 100 rounds for it to smooth itself out. Shoots fantastic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top