I recently got fed up waiting (closing in 3 months) for my 9mm Oly Arms AR-15, so I canceled that order.
I am now thinking of using that $ on a remington 700.
So, I have been looking @ scopes (btw currently own no scoped rifles). I've spent a fair amount of time looking @ the Leupold line of scopes.
But I must admit that I'm rather confused now.
I can't see a huge difference between most of the scopes, especially with the vast diversity in prices- I've seen some as cheap as $299 and others other $1k.
As far as range, I don't think I'd shoot past 300 yards, so take that into account. I just didnt know if there is much of a difference between the scopes- ie if the $300 scope will serve me just as well as one 2x the price.
<b>Second question</b>: is there any reason not to buy a scope with the most magnification? Are there any reasons that an individual would want a scope with a lower magnification? I believe I saw dif. models that were the same/a similar price but with different levels of magnification.
ty
I am now thinking of using that $ on a remington 700.
So, I have been looking @ scopes (btw currently own no scoped rifles). I've spent a fair amount of time looking @ the Leupold line of scopes.
But I must admit that I'm rather confused now.
I can't see a huge difference between most of the scopes, especially with the vast diversity in prices- I've seen some as cheap as $299 and others other $1k.
As far as range, I don't think I'd shoot past 300 yards, so take that into account. I just didnt know if there is much of a difference between the scopes- ie if the $300 scope will serve me just as well as one 2x the price.
<b>Second question</b>: is there any reason not to buy a scope with the most magnification? Are there any reasons that an individual would want a scope with a lower magnification? I believe I saw dif. models that were the same/a similar price but with different levels of magnification.
ty