Rossi 92 Range Report

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
9,122
Location
SE PA
Today I got out to the range and shot for the first time the Rossi 92 I bought last Thursday. I ran 150 rounds through it: 100 Sellier & Bellot .357 Magnum 158 grain JSP and 50 Winchester white box .38 Special +P 125 grain JHP.

Rossi_M92.jpg

Closeup of bolt-mounted safety, and integral gunlock in the hammer:

Rossi_M92_Safety.jpg

When cycling the gun empty at home the action felt pretty smooth. However, once I loaded it up it became evident that there were some burrs in the action. In particular, the S&B .357s were hanging up when trying to load them into the chamber. There were a couple burs on the breech face, alongside the ejector slot. After about 20 shots I took a needle file and knocked them down a bit. I worked through 50 rounds of .357 plus 10 rounds of .38 (which fed smoothly). After about 60 rounds the gun was noticeably smoother and I was able to do rapid mag dumps.

The S&B .357s were loaded with a truncated cone bullet, while the Winchester .38s had bullets with more of a curve to the ogive, basically a RNFP with a hole in the tip. The gun seems to feed better with a more rounded bullet profile so I'll try to use that sort of ammo in the future.

I am going to have to tweak the ejector a bit. Ejection of .357 brass was positive but when trying to eject the last .38 in the gun, the empty case stayed in the receiver every time.

When shooting .38s I also experienced one time when the cartridge on the carrier ejected from the gun along with the empty.

After about 60 or 70 rounds I noticed the bolt pin stop screw on the left of the reciever was loose. It will get some Loctite.

AIUI, it's not uncommon for the Rossi .357s (or Marlin 1894s in .357, for that matter) to experience issues with the shorter .38 rounds. As long as it works 100% with .357s I don't mind the occassional bobble with .38s.

The trigger is good. Probably about 5 or 6 pounds and crisp, with very little creep.

I shot the gun at 50 yards, mostly with my arms rested on a shooting bench. The gun will group into about 3" with the loads I shot today. With the rear sight set on the lowest position it shot a few inches high and about 2" left. Since it was pretty close I didn't adjust the sights today, concentrating more on functioning.

Aside from making sure the ejector is not binding on anything and is properly shaped, I plan to strip the gun and polish the wear points to slick it up (but I will NOT be touching the locking bolts, which set headspace). I will also probably replace the plastic magazine follower with one made from steel, and replace the ridiculous bolt-mounted safety.

Overall I'm pleased with the Rossi. It's a light, quick handling rifle in a useful caliber at a reasonable price. With a little "fluff and buff" it'll have a really slick action.
 
Thank you for a clear, detailed report... I'm leaning toward one of these in .45 Colt (saving pennies). My own experience with 92s (in .44) has been that they never handle two lengths equally well... though if you try to make them, they'll handle them equally poorly. That was as true of my Winchester as it seems to be of the Rossis (from what I've read, anyway). Sounds like the one you got has no real problems 500 rounds and some loctite won't ameliorate. Gives me a bit more confidence as I think about dropping money on the brand myself.
 
Welcome to the Rossi 92 club... :D

I've been working at slicking mine up for Cowboy Action use. As they come from the factory they work OK but are rather gritty and sticky in some spots as you've found. The ejector in particular on mine was full of burrs that tend to hang up and slow down the spring driven travel of the ejector. Stoning off the corners to remove the burrs and polishing out the area where the ejector spring lives makes a HUGE difference to the consistency of the ejection arc.

If you are interested you can find a wealth of hints on this work at;

http://marauder.homestead.com/files/Rossitune.htm
 
Thanks, BCR. That's one of several sites I've bookmarked for tuning info.

Several years ago I had a Rossi-made EMF Hartford Short rifle in .357 that I traded off, and have been kicking myself for doing so. It's good to be back in the fold.
 
Last edited:
I have been wanting to get one that will give me no issues using 38's. I have 2 that are 45's now. 20" and 24" and both are great. Nice report.
 
Mine will feed any .357 round, but will only do round nose .38 smoothly. When I first got it, it was pretty rough, but it slicked up nicely over the course of the 1000 rounds.
 
Great report and I have one in 45 Colt, 24" oct. barrel, case hardened/blued finish with the Steve's Gunz treatment as well as his safety removal plug. I also replaced the magazine follower with his metal version. Now I mostly shot it loaded with black powder and have to be very sure the 45 colts are very close to 1.6" max to 1.57 min or it will have feeding problems. Since I load my own however in 45 Colt in both smokeless and black powder it isn't too much of a problem once dieal in the first time on the bullet seating die. Love mine and often get to shoot other maker's models of the 92. Based on what I've shot most modified like mine it stacks up well against many costing 3 times as much.
 
You are making me jealous. I have been wanting one of these for so long but cant find one anywhere that is the model I want. I have been looking for a .38/.357 blue/case hardened with an octagon barrel. Heck I haven't seen hardly any in .357 in any model. My LGS had an EMF made one a while back and I didnt snatch it up when I should have. Thank you for your report. Hope you enjoy it!
 
Great guns...I have had a 92 .45C in SS for a couple of years and really like it.
Took me awhile but about 6 months ago I finally found the .38/357 in SS also.
Haven't shot it a lot but it has fed mostly .38s and some .357s with no issues whatsoever.
Interestingly both guns shot high, ran out of ramp to lower the rear sights. Took the ramp out and just let the leaf spring down naturally, just about right at 50 yards or so...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top