Ruger cylinder throats

Status
Not open for further replies.

xtarheel

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
246
Location
North Carolina
I thought I might post some personal observations about Ruger cylinder throats. Several years ago I purchased a Bisley Blackhawk in .45 Colt. I had read in several places about the problem with tight throats on these pieces. When the gun arrived, I took it over to the gunsmith in this shop and asked to have the throats reamed. He said that he had no idea what I was talking about. Using a “snap gauge” and micrometer I determined that my throats were indeed tight. So, I went home and ordered a Manson reamer and pilots from Brownells.

After doing mine, I thought others might be interested in this service so I had a guy at work design and put up a web site, 45throatdoctor, which is no longer in operation. I thought if I got a few cylinders from others it would help defray the cost of my tools. People from all over the country started sending cylinders. In the two and a half years I was doing this, I did over 250 cylinders. About 95% were in .45 Colt and the rest in .44. In addition to Ruger single actions, I did a few Redhawks and a couple Smiths. Rather than simply reaming them and sending them back, I would prepare a report showing the original throat diameters before reaming them to .4525 (for the .45). I also asked the customer to let me know how the gun shot afterwards.

What I found was as follows:

All Ruger single actions that I measured had throats tighter than .4525. Redhawks and Smiths were not bad at all.

Throat diameter sometimes varied widely within the same cylinder! Throats measured from as tight as about .4496 to about .4518.

Reports back stated three consistent improvements, 1. Much tighter groups 2. Elimination of fliers. 3. Reduction of leading.

In my opinion the reason for these improvements were due to the following:

Tighter groups and elimination of filers comes from the throats being uniformly sized. Since the recoil impulse begins prior to the bullet leaving the muzzle, a variation in throat constriction will vary the place in the recoil impulse when the bullet actually leaves the gun. I could actually predict if a gun were throwing fliers if one throat was considerably tighter or more open than the other five.

Leading would seem to be worse if the throats were tighter than the barrel diameter. If passing thought a throat that swages down the bullet that tight, the cast bullet is going to “skid” for a certain length of the barrel until it can get a firm grip on the rifling. While skidding, it will naturally be shedding lead.

Again, these are simply my observations and conjectures which I thought I would share. Again, I no longer do this work..
 
Ruger's penchant for tight throats in their Blackhawk and Vaquero .45's is well known among the cowboy action shooting community. Ruger also seemed to figure out the problem, though. A lot of Ruger's went back to Ruger for excessively tight throats, and Ruger apparently got tired of the expense of fixing them. Newer (2003+) Rugers don't seem to have this problem, at least not with the frequency they once did.

The problem I run into most often with modern revolvers is the wrong bore and throat size matched to 44-40 chambers. 44-40 barrels should have .4275 +/- .0005 bores (major diameter, i.e., "in the grooves"), and throats should be the same or up to .001 larger. In the 1970s, though, some manufacturers started using the same barrels on their .44-40 and .44 special/mag guns. .44 special/mag barrels are typically .4295. If you pair that bore diameter with cylinder throats that are only .4275, you're going to have a problem. Some manufacturers then "fixed" the problem by opening the throats to 44 spl/mag dimensions (.430 to .431), but it wasn't much of a fix. Most factory 44-40 ammo is still loaded with .427 bullets, so you'll never get good accuracy with .430 throats and .429 bores (and you'll get a lot of leading). The solution would seem to be to reload using .430 bullets designed for .44 spl/mag, but the problem then becomes the 44-40 chamber, which is often too tight to allow .430 bullets.

I have a Manson reamer that was custom made to "fix" this issue by opening the chamber neck (not throat) just enough to allow the use of .430 bullets. The real solution, however, is for manufacturers to put the proper barrels on their 44-40 revolvers. Colt and USFA still do, thankfully.
 
My experience with .45 Rugers is very similar, although I have only done about a dozen. One interesting aspect of this is to hear the uniformity or lack there of when firing a cylinder full of loads.
I have even opened a couple of .45 ACP cylinders for my Blackhawks. They were usually about .451” or a little less, to start. The latest one I got is .451” and I have left it for the moment. It shoots very well, so I haven’t seen the need to change it yet.
 
"In the two and a half years I was doing this, I did over 250 cylinders."

You did mine.
The results were terrific. My Ruger shoots like a rifle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top