mordechaianiliewicz
Member
Okay.... so, I've been looking at AR-15 models to buy, and the one that has stood out the most for me as something not to buy is the SR556.
My first gun was a Ruger. A 10/22 purchased when I was 18, working as a Customer Service Rep part time in the most terrible call center ever. I had no money, really. But, Ruger made a good gun, that would last for decades, and was very affordable for a guy making $8 an hour.
Times changed, I got better jobs, but Rugers continued to be a theme in my gun collection. The always offered a great value for not a lot of money.
I know they wanted a piece of the AR market, who wouldn't? But, Ruger's claim to fame seems to have always been 1. Take a design that's solid and make it inexpensively.... 2. Make sure it's as high quality as the models that cost a little more.... 3. Profit.
In the SR556 I see a gas pistoned AR that is several hundred dollars more than other gas piston ARs and is largely subcontracted to a whole bunch of other companies. It offers nothing that hasn't already been done by Stag Arms, or Bushmaster, or a few others for less money.
Basically, Ruger should have done what Smith & Wesson did with the M&P 15 Sporter. I just hope the SR556 is not a harbinger of things to come. I'd hate to see Ruger basically become a company that makes good stuff, but marks that stuff way up.
My first gun was a Ruger. A 10/22 purchased when I was 18, working as a Customer Service Rep part time in the most terrible call center ever. I had no money, really. But, Ruger made a good gun, that would last for decades, and was very affordable for a guy making $8 an hour.
Times changed, I got better jobs, but Rugers continued to be a theme in my gun collection. The always offered a great value for not a lot of money.
I know they wanted a piece of the AR market, who wouldn't? But, Ruger's claim to fame seems to have always been 1. Take a design that's solid and make it inexpensively.... 2. Make sure it's as high quality as the models that cost a little more.... 3. Profit.
In the SR556 I see a gas pistoned AR that is several hundred dollars more than other gas piston ARs and is largely subcontracted to a whole bunch of other companies. It offers nothing that hasn't already been done by Stag Arms, or Bushmaster, or a few others for less money.
Basically, Ruger should have done what Smith & Wesson did with the M&P 15 Sporter. I just hope the SR556 is not a harbinger of things to come. I'd hate to see Ruger basically become a company that makes good stuff, but marks that stuff way up.