Ruger SP101: Buffalo-Barnes SB XPB 140 .357

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Messages
905
Ruger SP101: Buffalo-Barnes SB XPB 140 .357 Velocity and Jug Test

The purpose of this post is to report on the performance of Buffalo-Bore's Buffalo-Barnes branded Tactical Low Flash Short Barrel XPB 140 Grain .357 Magnum in the Ruger SP101 as measured by a Competition Electronics Prochrono Digital.

10 shots were fired at approximately 10' from the chronograph. The temperature was exceptionally hot Florida summer weather! Here are the results:

String: 1171, 1172, 1184, 1166, 1168, 1182, 1184, 1160, 1214, 1187

Descriptive Statistics:

BBsp101140chronograph_zps22145868.jpg

Buffalo Bore advertises this load as traveling at 1149 ft/s out of a 2.5" S&W Mod 66. For today's test we were using a 2.25" Ruger SP101 KSP-321XL.

We can visualize the spread of this distribution via a boxplot with whiskers:

BBsp101boxplot_zpsef9edb70.jpg

The shaded area is the interquartile range, which is inclusive of 50% of the shots fired. The dark line in the shaded area is the median. In this case the mean (not shown) and the median are very close, despite a high outlying shot at 1214 ft/s. This string had the lowest standard deviation of any of the other rounds fired on 9/20/2013. Nice!

A single round of this ammo was fired through a 4.2" Ruger GP100 and clocked in at 1244 ft/s.

Using the SP101 KSP-321 XL, a single shot was fired into a row of one gallon water jugs. No denim or other material were used in the test. This round penetrated through 4 jugs of water and gave the 5th jug a shove that knocked it over but did not penetrate. The round was recovered in the 4th jug of water which had two leaking holes in it as well as the hollowpoint.

BB140357_zps7a4771db.jpg

Suffice to say Barnes reputation for consistency of expansion with their all-copper bullets is well deserved!

These results do not predict the bullets performance in other media.

This was my first time shooting the SP101, and I was not as accurate with it as I would have liked today. You can see I started off shooting a little high but was able to bring the sight picture down to get some good hits in the black and red zone. These 10 shots were the same used for data collection with the chronograph.

spxpb140target_zps313d4c5c.jpg

I'll be taking this one back to the range for some more practice.

I really like the profile of the SP101. It is sporting original compact rubber grips with aftermarket horn inserts. The horn was obtained from a sustainable source from domesticated water buffalo in India. I made every effort to determine that the horn was obtained legally and not from poaching.

Ruger SP101, the big man's little gun...

SPhold920_zpsbeb611aa.jpg

Discussion: The velocity I obtained from the tests in a 2.25" barrel exceeded Buffalo Bore's published velocity for this round from a 2.5" barrel on every shot.

Barnes has taken to loading their own ammunition under the VOR-TX brand. Barnes publishes their own .357 loading of this round at 1175 ft/s out of a 4" barrel. This Buffalo Bore - Buffalo Barnes load achieves comparable velocity from the 2.25" snub.

Federal loads the same bullet in their Vital-Shok brand of ammo at 1400 ft/s out of a 4" barrel. As mentioned previously, BB also loads it at 1519 ft/s out of a 4" barrel. This lower-recoiling, low flash short barrel version seems to be able to penetrate and expand in water while retaining its weight at the current speeds.

Switching caliber for a moment, Corbon loads a .40 S&W 140 Barnes XPB at 1200 ft/s out of a 4" semi-auto for their DPX brand of ammunition. I'm not sure if the 140 XPB in .40 is the same bullet or profile of the 140 XPB in .357, but this BB load has comparable velocity to Corbon's engineered 140 XPB in .40 S&W.

Velocity isn't the whole story, and I appreciate BB producing some high quality, low flash short barrel rounds.

So far I really like this round for the SP101. It has promising characteristics that in my opinion would make it a good urban carry load in the SP101 and other heavy but short ccw revolvers.

Thanks for hearing me out,

-Triple T
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absolutely. Thank you for asking.

Inside, they have a jet-black sheen:

rugers_zpsde174dbd.jpg

But in direct sunlight, the deep marbled grain becomes apparent:

sp1grips_zpsa556d6da.jpg

I purchased them from 1chig on ebay (http://www.ebay.com/usr/1chig). They don't have any horn listed on their shop right now but they do have box elder burl. I'm sure they would be willing to work with a potential client in obtaining material for grips and applying their craft to them.
 
Last edited:
that's a beautiful looking grip panel! thanks for mentioning the seller too, i'll be checking them out.
 
Despite similar weight and velocity, comparisons between the Buffalo-Barns 140 .357 XPB bullet and the Corbon DPX .40 S&W TAC-XP bullet end there.

Barnes XPB .357 (used in the tests of the original post)

Type: XPB
DIA: .357
WGT: 140 GR
LGTH: .776
S.D.: .157
B.C: .150

Barnes 10 MM/ 40 S&W TAC-XP

Type: TAC-XP
DIA: .400
WGT: 140 GR
LGTH: .682
S.D.: .125
B.C.: .128

Discussion:

These are different bullets, and are unsuitable for direct comparison.

However, the Buffalo-Barnes, Barnes Vor-TX, and Federal VITA-SHOK in .357 all appear to use the same 140 XPB bullet.

The XPB and TAC-XP seem to be Barnes' internal brand names for all copper bullets that vary by weight and caliber.
 
Last edited:
That looks like an SPSS output. Been awhile since I've seen that. I still miss my old SP101... Nice write up.
 
You got it - IBM SPSS Statistics Version 21. I've been playing with it a bit lately and took the rare opportunity to merge work and ballistic data :eek:

Thank you for the comments!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top