Running the Modern Combat Shotgun

Status
Not open for further replies.

9mmepiphany

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
27,079
Location
northern california
Well I had another epiphany…a shotgun epiphany

I recently had the pleasure of taking a tactical shotgun class from Randy Lee of Apex Tactical. Randy is a master wheelgunsmith and tactical trainer…his smith N and L-frame actions have to be felt to be believed. But this thread is about the shotgun.

I’ve been in LE for 27+ years and was introduced to the short-barreled shotgun in the academy. Over the years my relationship to the scattergun morphed from distaste to acceptance to competence. The thing I never liked was that it didn’t seem very accurate and was very clumsy to load/unload. I even had co-workers take me trap, skeet and bird shooting to try to feel more comfortable.

Randy spoke glowingly of the abilities of the scattergun and how efficiently, with proper training it could be run. I have great faith in his opinion and jumped at the chance to take a course from him. So on an overcast day in September we gathered at a range in northern CA to be introduced to the “modern technique” of the shotgun. We ranged from LEOs, to hunters, to folks who just wanted to get the most out of their home defense weapon.

He started the class by explaining how the “traditional” way of handling the LE shotgun was basically counter-intuitive. We had all been taught to use it in a way, which handicapped the user rather than maximizing efficiency. He demonstrated some of the advances to the design of the gun over the years.

The real eye opener for me was when he taught a method of loading the chamber and mag of a pumpgun, which was completely opposite to that taught by my department. A system of loading that allowed me to load a round in the chamber and four in the mag in the time it would have previously taken me to chamber a round and slip one round into the mag.

He discussed sights, stocks, shell carriers and the proper use of the sling. He had all the toys for show and tell as well as handling and shooting. He covered target transitions, failure drills and the transition from the long gun to the sidearm. He had a great demonstration of shot patterning at ranges from up close out to 50 yards. Another eye opener was the effect the Vang Comp barrel had on shot column density.

We got to handle a wide variety of shotguns during the class. Members of the class had a collection of guns, which had all the cutting edge accessories applied to them. Randy brought out his tricked out 870, benelli and 11-87.

The end of the day brought two great exercises that the whole class loved. One was a table set up with three different unloaded shotguns (each shooter added his own gun to the mix) with four shells on the table next to each gun. Each shooter would move from gun to gun, loading and shooting each gun at steel plates. Each shooter was stunned at their ability to handle all the different guns with hardly a bobble. The other exercise was the “4X4 cut-down.” It was the semi-autos vs. the pumps…it looked like a scene out of “ZULU” with shooters running out of shells and calling for more ammo. The superior accuracy of the Vang Comp pumps won over the higher rate of fire of the semis.

Randy’s only regret was that he did not get a chance to cover all the topics that he had wanted. He didn’t have time to go over shooting on the move or shooting from cover…among others. He felt so bad; he is offering a make-up day to do justice to the subject…what a gentleman.

If you use/own a shotgun as part of your employment or for home defense, I highly recommend that you take his course to learn to efficiently operate your gun. I would even recommend LEOs take this course, even if you have to pay for it out of your own pocket. You owe it to yourself to learn to properly run this most devastating of weapons.
 
Training is a key aspect of increasing your ability to use your chosen tools for self defense. I cannot go so far as to say there is no such thing as bad training, unfortunately. But any training from an instructor who is current in the state of the art in his or her chosen platform will be beneficial in some way, even if it only shows you some things that don't work well for you. Training really is fundamental, even though it may not always be fun. If you are to improve yourself, you MUST challenge yourself with opportunities to learn. The best way I know of to provide yourself with these challenges is to put yourself in the hands of a good trainer, who will demonstrate new skills or new skill levels for you, teach you the techniques to employ those skills yourself, critique and correct you as you learn them, and then give you a chance to perform them under pressure, in front of the rest of your class.

No one wants to look like an idiot in front of an instructor and a bunch of fellow shooters. But sometimes you will, simply because you drive yourself to distraction in the face of this unaccustomed pressure. But think about this- if having to perform in front of a friendly instructor and a handful of fellow shooters can turn you into a ten-thumbed no-bained fumblebum in an otherwise non-threatening situation, what is going to happen to you if some crackhead monster has kicked your door down in the middle of the night and is intent on ripping the lungs out of you or your family?

There is such a thing as 'stress inoculation,' I was working at the facility where one study on stress inoculation was done when it took place (see http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0211/08/ltm.02.html , http://www.training.sfahq.com/survival_training.htm etc.) Good training will provide you with the kind of stress- in a controlled environment- that can help you deal with the effects of simlar stress later in an uncontrolled environment. As far as I know, the only other way to experience these levels of stress is to do it live and for real. That's a great way to learn- if you live through it. It's a lot smarter to do your learning in a training situation, don't you think?

Congratulations to 9mmepiphany for getting his first 'vaccination'- I hope there will be more of the controlled environment kind in the future for everyone here.

lpl/nc (just back from Andy Stanford's Glock Summit in Titusville, FL, where John Farnam turned me into a ten-thumbed no-brained fumblebum in front of 20-odd other shooters... but I lived through it, and learned from it. BUT- it was with a pistol, not a shotgun... 8^)
 
I, too, had a bit on an epiphany after a recent shotgun class.

Going into it, I'd had a carbine class and a handful of pistol classes (including Farnam's ten-thumbed no-brained fumblebum 101 ;) ), and I had a preconception that running the pump shotgun would be comparatively less complicated......

What I found was that my 870 is a devilish device that produces various POIs and various ranges, and feeds mulitple ammunition types (with wildly different ballistic properties) through several holes. I discovered that the "just keep track of everyting" methodolgy that I brought to class quickly fell apart and I needed a system for running the pump gun. Of course, that's exactly what I'd come for and exactly what I got.

The end result is a shift in my focus of practice and sustainment training toward the pump gun and away from other platforms (at least for a while). That's not something I would have considered prior to the class.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top