S&W 64 dash numbers

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeG

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
255
Location
Falcon Colorado
A local pawn shop has 3 LE turn in S&W model 64s, a -3, -5, and -8.
I definitely want one but don't know which one.
I'm aware Smith had a period of diminished quality.
Also the -8 has the internal lock.
Assuming equal condition (and they're priced the same), which would be best?
 
Same here. All things equal, the dash 3. Might be lucky and get a pinned barrel version. Dash 3 was made from 1977 until 1988. The pinned barrel was deleted in 82. A dash 5 would still have the firing pin on the hammer and all but the last year still had forged hammer & trigger, so that would be the second choice. The dash 8 will have a 2 piece barrel, MIM hammer & trigger as well as the lock
 
I'm not one that immediately writes off a Bangor Punta-era Smith until I've checked it out. They're all on the board for me if they came out of the factory before about 1994.

As already noted, dash-3 for sure, but I'd probably settle for a dash-5 if it checks out good. But for a K-frame -- I gotta go with the firing pin on the hammer and no MIM (even though I have owned exactly three S&W revolvers from the modern era).
 
I would get the 3, then the 5. I have a 64 that was a police trade in that is DAO and I shoot it more than most of my other guns. Great trigger.

I must also respond to the comment that 'I'm aware Smith had a period of diminished quality.' Not trying to derail, but I have been shooting, buying and selling S&W revolvers for 22 years of all age/makes/models and I have never laid eyes on a S&W revolver of 'diminished quality.' Production materials, methods, and designs changed and some may consider, say, a recessed cylinder or any of the other many changes to be more or less desirable. But the quality in my experience has always been very high.
 
MikeG,

Look at each of them carefully, test
their timing, fit and in your estimation
pick the best. Do not dismiss the -8.
It could be the tightest, least abused.

Blanket statements about diminished
quality are often off base.
 
I'm not a fan of the later models for nothing other than aesthetics. I'm sure the quality is there, but I don't care for the hole, or the cylinder release shape it requires.

A pinned barrel in a -3, if there, would be my first choice, assuming it was in overall good shape.

Don't worry about the exterior, a gray Scotchbrite pad matches very well with the factory finish for easy touch ups.
 
You’ll like it :thumbup:.

All I did with my semi-abused and formerly filthy AIM Surplus Model 64-3 trade-in was paint the front sight white-then-blaze orange so it stood out enough when I am shooting at my local indoor range.

16E3C267-B07B-4C01-849B-222FE0C4C692.jpeg

Let us know how it shoots for you when you get a chance to give it some exercise :).

Stay safe.
 
All I did with my semi-abused and formerly filthy AIM Surplus Model 64-3 trade-in was paint the front sight white-then-blaze orange so it stood out enough when I am shooting at my local indoor range.

View attachment 1078124
41568CC1-6107-446C-BCDB-D9FF94748E70.jpeg

Same-same with my 65-5, only thing I added was some flat white on the rear sight. When I was working, I used to keep a red China marker in my drawer for the same purpose. Worked well, just gave it a quick touch up every so often.

OP: good luck with your new gun!
 
I've painted the front sight and will make up moderate hand loads with lead/powder coated/plated bullets for the range.
The bore and chambers are like new and I'm very pleased with this revolver.
Does anyone know which LE agencies turned these in? I can't find any marks and the importers/dealers won't say.

And Speedo66, I have these two.
Treats?2.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top