Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

SAF Fires Back at Daly's Lame Attempt to Penalize Gun Makers for City's Failures

Discussion in 'Legal' started by gunsmith, Jun 17, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=67622

    SAF Fires Back at Daly's Lame Attempt to Penalize Gun Makers for City's Failures

    6/15/2006 2:03:00 PM

    To: City Desk

    Contact: Alan Gottlieb of Second Amendment Foundation, 425-454-7012

    BELLEVUE, Wash., June 15 /U.S. Newswire/ -- An offer by anti- gun San Francisco Supervisor Chris Daly to cover court costs -- in response to a call by the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) that he pay for the city's appeal of a court ruling striking down that city's handgun ban -- was dismissed by SAF as a "lame attempt to deflect responsibility for a failure of leadership."

    Daly's offer carries what SAF called "a preposterous condition" that the gun industry accept civil liability for the costs of violent crime in San Francisco. SAF is one of four major plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the city's gun ban, approved last November as Proposition H. Earlier this week Superior Court Judge James Warren ruled the ban violates state law.

    "The firearms industry," said SAF founder Alan Gottlieb, "is one of the most heavily-regulated industries in the country. Gun makers are not responsible for crimes committed in San Francisco or anywhere else, and Daly knows it. In numerous rulings, the courts have said that the industry is not liable for the criminal acts of violent urban thugs.

    "Not only should Daly pay for the appeal," Gottlieb said, "he should also sponsor legislation that would require the city -- not gun makers -- to compensate every violent crime victim in San Francisco that over-worked police can't protect, and who cannot protect themselves because the city wants to disarm them.

    "If Daly wants to point fingers of blame for San Francisco's crime problems," he continued, "he should start with the California Legislature, which has incrementally disarmed law- abiding Golden State citizens and stripped away not only their firearms rights, but their ability to fight back.

    "He can blame the environment of permissiveness that lets career criminals repeatedly escape justice," Gottlieb added, "by tying the hands of police and prosecutors, and disabling the courts.

    "If Daly seriously wants to do something meaningful about gun crime," Gottlieb challenged, "he should forget about extorting money from gun manufacturers-punishing them for crimes they didn't commit-and instead of banning guns, he should lobby Sacramento for a statewide shall-issue right-to-carry law.

    "Daly and his ilk have used gun makers and gun rights organizations as scapegoats for the disastrous consequences of their own failed social philosophy," Gottlieb stated. "But Daly and his contemporaries do not believe in accepting responsibility, instead blaming everyone else for problems their failure of leadership has created.

    "You don't stop criminals by disarming their victims," Gottlieb said. "We'll see you again in court, Chris."

    The Second Amendment Foundation ( http://www.saf.org ) is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, the Foundation has grown to more than 600,000 members and supporters nationwide, and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

    http://www.usnewswire.com/

    -0-
     
  2. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    I hate it when people inject a note of reality into perfectly enjoyable irrational discussions.
     
  3. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    I believe it is also the fault of the gun owners and pro-gun organizations that we have not advanced as far as we should have.

    Example - Has there ever been a suit filed against a city, county or state by an honest citizen or their next of kin, beause the honest citizen applied for a gun permit, was turned down and then was assaulted or killed.

    Pro-gunners should learn from the ACLU that everytime an anti-gun law is passed, police/sheriff fail to issue a permit and a person is attacked afterwards and cannot defend themselves, the governing body will be facing a lawsuit.

    Enough lawsuits and the powers in charge may start thinking differently.
     
  4. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    great idea desert dog!

    It's a wonder it hasn't been tried yet.
    I guess gunnies are not as lawsuit happy as the libbies are.
     
  5. XD_fan

    XD_fan Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2005
    Messages:
    210
    Location:
    Missouri
    Any suit attempting to place blame on local and state governments would meet with a quick dismissal. There is no right to protection by police, local or otherwise. You have to remember who owns the courts.
     
  6. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    5,906
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    the lawsuit isn't

    because the police won't protect you it's because they won't let you protect your self...
     
  7. Hutch

    Hutch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,675
    Location:
    Opelika, AL
    I agree that the government that denies civil rights should be held liable if they do. Unfortunately, most such entities are protected by "Sovreign Immunity". Wish it weren't so.:(
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page