Samurai swords don't run out of bullets...

Status
Not open for further replies.
jason41987 said:

japanese swords are rather limiting and efficient anyway... and very short for the weight.. but what can you expect when you use a heavy cast iron weight to bring the point of balance further back?... europeans simply used leverage by putting the weight on the opposite side of the grip... the longer the sword, the longer the grip, leverage does the rest so europeans had larger swords that were lighter with better balance

Huh? Apparently you've never held or examined a well made katana or wakizashi?
 
Except this isn't actually true. The katana evolved from the tachi during the Warring States Period. The only major difference between early katana and tachi were how they were mounted and carried. Edge up is katana. Edge down is tachi. It isn't uncommon for early blades to be remounted from one to the other. The katana replaced the tachi because edge up became preferred. It put the swordsman in a good neutral middle guard after the draw, not an awkward hanging guard (as with a saber but without the saber hilt's protection to the prominently located hands).

Not all katana are alike though. Because the katana form survived through the relatively peaceful Tokugawa shogunate that followed the Warring States Period, some are definitely more warlike in construction than others. Length and curvature varied a lot with peacetime swords being shorter and straighter than wartime swords.

Well, you have to remember Mr. Shirley's a real life ninja, so his swords might be a bit different than everyone else's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top