Skofnung
Member
The way I look at it, if you are justified in hitting someone with a blackjack, you are justified to use deadly force, and thus the restriction on smacking the head is moot.
A blackjack is no less a deadly weapon in the eyes of the law than a knife. If you hit a fellow with one, you had best have a very compelling reason for doing so.
All that said, the collarbone would be a great less-lethal target, though you might miss and hit the head...
A blackjack is no less a deadly weapon in the eyes of the law than a knife. If you hit a fellow with one, you had best have a very compelling reason for doing so.
All that said, the collarbone would be a great less-lethal target, though you might miss and hit the head...