Savage Scout Rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.

jmr40

Member
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
17,502
Location
Georgia
A couple of weeks ago there were several questoins regarding the Scout rifle from Savage. I commented that I had one ordered and would post a report when it came in. Came in Friday and took it to the range this AM. The rifle comes with a 20" barrel with a forward rail for a scout scope and a receiver mounted peep sight. Since I do not have a scout scope I took the rail and peep off and mounted a 2-7X Pentax on the receiver. I had an old Remington rear sight in my box of spare parts and it fit perfectly for a rear sight. Savage only drills and taps one hole for both the front and rear sights. The Remington sight is made to work with 2 holes, but it held fine with only 1 screw. Some will not like this but I can convert it back to the origional configuration in 15 min. if I decide to get a scout scope later.

If you have seen one of the older scout rifles Savage has made a few changes. The new ones come with the accu-trigger and a soft recoil pad similar to a limbsaver pad. The old gun had a large bolt handle while the new one has a standard size bolt handle. The detachable magazine has been improved and is probably the best design I have seen. Savage uses a steel insert that goes inside of the stock for the magazine to fit into. It is solid and secure. Someone needs to make a 10 round magazine for this gun. The trigger guard on this gun is steel instead of the plastic I have seen on other Savages. Instead of a matte finish on the barrel and receiver they are a polished blue. I think Savage used to offer the Scout in 7mm-08 as well but .308 is the only choice now.

Savage lists the Scout at 6 1/4 lbs. but mine weighs 7 lbs. I believe this is because of the steel insert and triggerguard that have been added. I fired 10 groups of 3 shots with it today. With loads it liked it came close to 1" grouips a couple of times but most groups were 1 1/2" to 2".

There are a lot of things I like about this rifle and a few things I don't. I like the accu-trigger, the recoil pad and the newly designed stock. The detachable mag as I said earlier is the best design I have seen.

I don't like the long actions that Savage uses. Even though this is Savage's short action I have scopes on my long action Remingtons and Winchesters that are too short to use on this short action. I am also disapointed in the extra weight. I bought this gun to use as a carrying around light weight gun. I was willing to give up a little accuracy for portability. My Tikka weighs the same with a scope on it as the Scout does without a scope. At this time I own several guns that are both lighter and more accurate.

I did not try it with irons today and will probably put the peep back on it for my next range trip. Hopefully after a good cleaning the accuracy will improve. I have read that Savages are bad about the barrels fouling quickly.
 
Sorry no pics. Savage does not list them on the web site, www.savagearms.com, but if you go to the site and download the 2008 catalog you can see a picture in the catalog on page 20. The specs. for the rifle are listed on page 35. Bottom left hand corner. You will have to zoom in the page to see the specs.
 
they now list them on the web site. Gunbroker has them in the Mid $500 range

Yes! Finally! :D
I've wanted one of these for a long time. So, the scout is a "regular" or somewhat regular offering from Savage once again? Basically, can I find it in a store or have it ordered without to much of a wait time?
Oh, and what type of scope(s) would everyone here prefer?
 
I'm also toying with the idea of the Savage Scout (that or CZ 550).
Local dealer will order it for $515 plus tax.

AS for EER scopes he recommended Leupold or Burris. I don't know if Nikon makes an EER scope, but I find they have the clearest images and gather lots of light.

I wish it came with a pretty wood stock, though. It may compromise the scout ideal, but I prefer the beauty of wood to plastic. Firearms used to be more artful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top