BreechFace
Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2020
- Messages
- 3,805
Anyone have any personal experience with one of these kits?
Scheel's Delayed Blowback Buffer
They are expensive for what they are, especially when there isn't much customer base to base any performance on, but would be a nice option for blowback PCC's.
I have an PSA AR-V, essentially an AR PCC with a Scorpion patterned magwell (PSA has their own Scorpion patterned mag that is cheap and good quality). The AR-V is direct blowback and I thought this would be a good candidate to try something like this as if it works would help with back pressure from being suppressed as well as potentially mitigate some bolt bounce and OOB potentials.
Some of the concerns that many brought up when it was first rolled out was wear on the "proprietary" buffer tube as the steel rollers engage the buffer tube on each cycle. Another concern was how the buffer stays in alignment with the buffer tube notches.
The developer of it said both of these concerns have not been an issue, he has 10,000 rounds (probably more now) through his with no appreciable wear to the aluminum buffer tube notches. He also replied that with the aforementioned concern as well as the buffer alignment they were both his concerns and both ended up being a non-issue. He said the buffer will rotate a degree or two in the tube but wants to follow a linear path due to the rollers and once they hit the notch they self-correct any minor misalignment for the next cycle.
Scheel's Delayed Blowback Buffer
They are expensive for what they are, especially when there isn't much customer base to base any performance on, but would be a nice option for blowback PCC's.
I have an PSA AR-V, essentially an AR PCC with a Scorpion patterned magwell (PSA has their own Scorpion patterned mag that is cheap and good quality). The AR-V is direct blowback and I thought this would be a good candidate to try something like this as if it works would help with back pressure from being suppressed as well as potentially mitigate some bolt bounce and OOB potentials.
Some of the concerns that many brought up when it was first rolled out was wear on the "proprietary" buffer tube as the steel rollers engage the buffer tube on each cycle. Another concern was how the buffer stays in alignment with the buffer tube notches.
The developer of it said both of these concerns have not been an issue, he has 10,000 rounds (probably more now) through his with no appreciable wear to the aluminum buffer tube notches. He also replied that with the aforementioned concern as well as the buffer alignment they were both his concerns and both ended up being a non-issue. He said the buffer will rotate a degree or two in the tube but wants to follow a linear path due to the rollers and once they hit the notch they self-correct any minor misalignment for the next cycle.
Last edited: