Schumer in Political Bribe Scandal?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sean Cloherty

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
198
Location
Massachusetts
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20040518/1051557.asp

Firm's gift to Schumer preceded bill in its favor
By DOUGLAS TURNER
News Washington Bureau Chief
5/18/2004

WASHINGTON - Sen. Charles E. Schumer received more than $54,000 in campaign gifts from a major security company about two months before he sponsored a bill the company said it "urgently needed," a nonpartisan research organization said Monday.
The legislation would allow private security firms to get confidential FBI background information on prospective employees. The bill would let private police companies research FBI subject files going back 10 years.

The Tennessee-based firm is called Guardsmark, one of the largest private security firms in the country with revenues topping $500 million a year.

The research organization, PoliticalMoneyline, said 34 donors affiliated with Guardsmark gave Friends of Schumer $54,500 on Jan. 27, 2003. These 34 contributors "made no other donations" in the current 2003-04 election cycle.

Guardsmark President Ira A. Lipman gave Schumer's campaign $1,500 in February 2003, and gave Republicans $25,000 later in the year.

The Senate Judiciary Committee, on which Schumer, D-N.Y., sits, passed the legislation last October. The full Senate passed it in November.

"It's very unusual to see company executives, who never gave to anyone else, to make this large a contribution on the same day," said an experienced researcher on campaign finance. "It shows the influence a CEO can exert in a company."

Schumer and Guardsmark said the legislation is a homeland security issue.

Blake Zeff, spokesman for Schumer, said "long before Sen. Schumer even heard of Guardsmark, he believed that all security guards should have background checks. Post-9/11, most New Yorkers would agree it is even more urgent that anyone applying for this kind of sensitive position be thoroughly checked."

"Private security is a vital front-line defense against terrorism and crime," said Lipman. "Private security officers today outnumber public law enforcement by 3-to-1."

Five days after passage by the Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee on Oct. 23, 2003, Lipman donated $25,000 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

The Senate bill is awaiting action by the House Judiciary Committee.

Lipman donated $309,000 in soft money to the Democratic National Committee in 2000, and another $25,000 to former Vice President Al Gore's Florida recount effort.
 
This will be swept under the rug. This type of thing goes on all the time in DC.

GT
 
[sarcasm]
Politicians taking money for votes!! Oh My, say it isn't so!:what:
[sarcasm off]

Sad to say, business as usual. Unlikely to be more than a one day story.
 
Even if Schumer is sent to prision, the chances of which are about 0.0000001%, New Yorkers will only replace him with another grabber. Ultra-liberal New York City out votes the rest of the State every time.
 
"C'mon, coppers, you'll never take me alive"
schumer.jpg

"Top of the world, ma......."
 
Wow, what a shocker!!! /sarcasim

When ever I think of Congress, and Schumer or his ilk in particular, I think of things said by one Mr. Mark Twain about that august body. For example:

Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.
- Mark Twain, a Biography

I know that there ARE honorable, decent folk serving in Congress. Sadly they are few and far between.
 
NAH

cant be true..
Chuckie swore to uphold the constitution....except the 2nd.
He would NEVER take a bribe...i mean gift....
time for meds.....
 
My personal opinion of up-Chuck The Schmuck Schumer cannot be published on "The High Road".

But maybe someday, Chucky & Ted "Where are my pants, my car, and my pregnant secretary?" Kennedy will have ajoining cells.
 
The Torch (Torricelli)

He was involved in a Hit and Run here in NJ last year. He actually went on record saying that the police had "other motivations" with charging him. Despite the fact that he was seen hitting a parked car, getting out and inspecting the damage (a 30 inch wide, $700 dent), getting back in, and leaving the scene. I believe he was found guilty of this charge and his license was suspended for six months. DMV spokesman said the charge could have been avoided by the simple courtesy of leaving a note on the car.

This guy has such a martyr complex. He never really apologized to the public for his misdeads (though his partner in crime ended up in the pen) that cost him his senate seat. If someone can go to jail for bribing a public official, then surely, that public official should do at least as much time if not more for violating the public trust and the higher moral/ethical standard we expect they hold themselves to. He was only "severely admonished" by the ethics committee. His resignation speech was no mea culpa. It was a "why does everybody hate me? I was taught we forgive others". Literally. No, the actual quote is "I remember an America when a person made an error and asked forgiveness, they were forgiven. That was our faith and our culture." The only apologies I know of that he gave was 1) to 3 senators on the ethics committee in a closed chamber--Reid, Leahy, and Hatch and 2) in a campaign ad paraphrased "I'm sorry for my ethical lapses, I will try learn from my mistakes. Please vote for me"

He was more recently cited for doing 40 in a 25mph school zone. He paid the fine rather than fight it, his attorney's quote that time was he "didn't really have much confidence he'd get a fair hearing". I think the above mentioned license suspension was stayed while he appeals the hit and run conviction.

Not only were the voters and the Bergen Record against him, but so are the courts too.

So in summary, since you asked Justin, Torricelli and ethics are still not on speaking terms.
 
Last edited:
"It's very unusual to see company executives, who never gave to anyone else, to make this large a contribution on the same day," said an experienced researcher on campaign finance. "It shows the influence a CEO can exert in a company."

The influence a CEO can exert? Excuse me? No, it shows the value of paying off a sitting Senator, and the corrupting effect of having a government that extorts roughly 25% of GNP from the populace and regularly eliminates more basic rights anytime its convenient to do so. Without knowing the facts for sure, I am quite certain that each and every one of the execs that gave money to Chuck the Schmuck will be getting a larger bonus this year. Yeah, sure, the CEO probably told all of his underlings "You WILL donate to Schumer, like him or not, because it serves the interests of this company - either that, or you can donate to whomever you want from your unemployment check," but that's not the point. The point is that only the gargantuan size and power of the fed.gov enables bribes like this to mean anything. If the government was taking only 2% of GNP and truly respected the limits placed on its power by the Founding Fathers, there'd be almost nothing worthwhile to bribe a Senator for.
 
Stebalo-

Thanks for the info. I remember it was a pretty big news deal when he got busted, but couldn't remember if the bum got tossed out of office or not.

Hopefully something like Schumer taking a bribe will add fuel to the fire to get him tossed out on his ear.
 
Chuck will continue to be a thorn in our collective backsides for years to come.The people who vote for him could care less ....
Thank you for cutting to the the chase. In New York, as long as you'll vote with the far left, you can pretty much do whatever the heck you want. Although I wouldn't get too comfortable having Hillary Clinton in my state, if I were another Senator (for a whole host of reasons). :scrutiny:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top