Primary poll question: What magnification do you favor for a woodchuck/prairie dog rifle used out to 400+ yards? Don't say 'variable', pretend you had to pick a fixed scope or name your most-used magnification if you do use variables.
Rest of thread:
I have a nice heavy barrel winchester in 22-250, and I'm trying to decide if a certain 12x fixed scope is ideal or not. The deal is tempting but I thought most people used a bit more magnification than that for long range work.
Similarly, I'm not sure if it would be just a bit too much magnification to buy it and put in on my Featherweight in .223 for 100-250 yard work.
My father says that powers over 12x are worthless anyway because mirage effects become more of a problem, but I have never had a variable that I didn't just leave cranked up....is there such a thing as too much magnification in a rifle where FOV is not really important?
Rest of thread:
I have a nice heavy barrel winchester in 22-250, and I'm trying to decide if a certain 12x fixed scope is ideal or not. The deal is tempting but I thought most people used a bit more magnification than that for long range work.
Similarly, I'm not sure if it would be just a bit too much magnification to buy it and put in on my Featherweight in .223 for 100-250 yard work.
My father says that powers over 12x are worthless anyway because mirage effects become more of a problem, but I have never had a variable that I didn't just leave cranked up....is there such a thing as too much magnification in a rifle where FOV is not really important?