SCOTUS case to be heard and mis-information

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
2,477
Location
South-Western North Carolina
National Rifle Association v. Chicago / McDonald v. Chicago
At issue: Second Amendment rights to gun ownership.



A pair of cases challenge Chicago's 27-year-old ban on handgun sales within the city limits. Originally designed to curb violence in the city, the ban has long irked Second Amendment advocates, who take an expansive view of the amendment's wording that the "right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." But the Supreme Court had long held that the Second Amendment pertained only to federal laws, until a 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller struck down a ban on handguns and automatic weapons in
washingtonon, D.C. The ruling marked the first time the Supreme Court acknowledged an individual right to bear arms, and it opened the door for these challenges to the Chicago regulation.

notice the 'automatic weapons'. I tryed underlineing this but failed.
this is from Yahoo News on my homepage.
 
Actually it's sort of correct - the DC statutes challenged in Heller defined an automatic weapon as any full or semi-auto (and possibly even other action types, I can't recall for sure) that could accept a magazine of more than 10 rounds, regardless of whether they could actually fire on full auto or not. Ridiculous but true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top