wingnutx
Member
Nancy Errera, who has helped run her family's gun shop for many years, and has been insured by Safeco Insurance for several years, received this notice recently with a Non-renewal form letter.
The non-renewal was on a form letter with no names, phone numbers, etc. and the reasons were inserted.
Reasons:
"Your ownership of a gunshop, lobbying activities regarding gun control, and involvement in organizing "shoots" represent an increased liability exposure."
Nancy has this to say: Safeco is passing judgement on a subject about which they obviously know nothing. My ladies' shoots are for the purpose of teaching handgun safety - Safeco should be thanking me, not cancelling me. 500-600 women have participated at no charge to them in the last 5 years, and I've handed out three bandaids, all for non-shooting-related maladies. I'm in the process of cancelling the rest of my Safeco insurance, and writing a scathing letter about their anti-self-defense, anti-civil rights, anti-Constitution policy.
I appreciate any effort to spread the word.
Thanks!
Nancy Errea South Dakota Coordinator Second Amendment Sisters Rapid City, SD
Here is Nancy's letter to the SD Insurance Board:SD Division of Insurance
To whom it may concern:
I wish to file a complaint about the cancellation of an umbrella policy I had with Safeco Insurance. Rather than go into a detailed explanation, I ask you to please read the attached letter that I sent to the board members of Safeco; it thoroughly explains my objection to their decision. Also attached is the copy of the notice of cancellation, including the policy number.
Having been insured by Safeco for the past few years, to find that all of a sudden I?m being rejected for exercising my constitutional rights, specifically my Second Amendment rights, is a blatant rejection of the law of the land. As South Dakota must protect the rights of its citizens, I respectfully request the Division of Insurance to investigate this situation. None of the Safeco literature that was given to me to induce me to insure with Safeco, nor any of the provisions printed on the policy which I have tried to renew make any reference to firearms education and training.
In addition, there has never been a claim against me regarding my involvement with firearms training. Surely Safeco has access to statistics regarding shooting sports injuries and accidents, and knows that those accidents are practically non-existent.
Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Nancy Errea
http://2asisters.org/
The non-renewal was on a form letter with no names, phone numbers, etc. and the reasons were inserted.
Reasons:
"Your ownership of a gunshop, lobbying activities regarding gun control, and involvement in organizing "shoots" represent an increased liability exposure."
Nancy has this to say: Safeco is passing judgement on a subject about which they obviously know nothing. My ladies' shoots are for the purpose of teaching handgun safety - Safeco should be thanking me, not cancelling me. 500-600 women have participated at no charge to them in the last 5 years, and I've handed out three bandaids, all for non-shooting-related maladies. I'm in the process of cancelling the rest of my Safeco insurance, and writing a scathing letter about their anti-self-defense, anti-civil rights, anti-Constitution policy.
I appreciate any effort to spread the word.
Thanks!
Nancy Errea South Dakota Coordinator Second Amendment Sisters Rapid City, SD
Here is Nancy's letter to the SD Insurance Board:SD Division of Insurance
To whom it may concern:
I wish to file a complaint about the cancellation of an umbrella policy I had with Safeco Insurance. Rather than go into a detailed explanation, I ask you to please read the attached letter that I sent to the board members of Safeco; it thoroughly explains my objection to their decision. Also attached is the copy of the notice of cancellation, including the policy number.
Having been insured by Safeco for the past few years, to find that all of a sudden I?m being rejected for exercising my constitutional rights, specifically my Second Amendment rights, is a blatant rejection of the law of the land. As South Dakota must protect the rights of its citizens, I respectfully request the Division of Insurance to investigate this situation. None of the Safeco literature that was given to me to induce me to insure with Safeco, nor any of the provisions printed on the policy which I have tried to renew make any reference to firearms education and training.
In addition, there has never been a claim against me regarding my involvement with firearms training. Surely Safeco has access to statistics regarding shooting sports injuries and accidents, and knows that those accidents are practically non-existent.
Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Nancy Errea
http://2asisters.org/
I found this on freerepublic. Thought people here might find itn interesting.