Senator Teddy is having a hissy fit

Status
Not open for further replies.

alan

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,601
Location
sowest pa.
NEWS RELEASE
TED KENNEDY'S HYPOCRISY SHOWS THROUGH
IN RANT ABOUT GUN BILL, SAYS CCRKBA
Sen. Edward Kennedy is "once again epitomizing Democrat hypocrisy" for ranting about an anti-gun bill being bottled up in the Senate, while he and his cronies continue to block confirmation of federal judges nominated by the Bush Administration, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) said today.

Kennedy was quoted by the Associated Press complaining that a bill to ban non-existent plastic guns was being anonymously blocked by a Republican senator. Kennedy reportedly stated, "That's unacceptable, and the Senate leadership has a responsibility to act…An undetectable Republican senator cannot be permitted to embarrass the entire Senate by blocking action…"


"If Ted Kennedy wants to find someone who has frequently embarrassed the Senate, he should rush to the nearest mirror," CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb observed. "There he will find a political buffoon who would rather waste valuable time passing laws against guns that don't exist instead of doing the people's business, and allow the Senate to vote up or down on several important judicial nominations."


"Somebody should remind Ted Kennedy that his cronies in! the Senate have become masters of the blockade," Gottlieb added. "If anyone deserves criticism for creating gridlock in the United States Senate, it is Kennedy and his far-left partisan colleagues who have been systematically blocking confirmation of nominees to the federal bench for months. These nominations are important, because we need to fill vacancies on various courts. Yet, because these nominees may believe that all ten amendments in the Bill of Rights should be enforced, and that the Constitution should not be rewritten through judicial activism, the Kennedy crowd is deliberately stalling the process.


"Kennedy is whining about holding up a bill aimed at a problem that does not exist," Gottlieb stated. "Yet he and his cadre of extremist left cohorts have been stonewalling action on critically important judicial nominations. Before Ted Kennedy starts wringing his hands over some unidentified Senator embarrassing the entire Senate, maybe he should think about the mou! nting embarrassment that is being created quite visibly by obstructionists like Pat Leahy of Vermont, Dianne Feinstein of California, and Patty Murray of Washington.


With more than 650,000 members and supporters nationwide, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is one of the nation's premier gun rights organizations. As a non-profit organization, the Citizens Committee is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States.




The bill being "held up" by some unnamed Republican?? Senator is S. 1774
To repeal the sunset provisions in the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

October 22, 2003
Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. CORZINE, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. REED, and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A BILL
To repeal the sunset provisions in the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.

These "Undectable Firerms" didn't exist in 1988, and they don't exist now.
 
And remind him not to offer his help to any lady foot first. I hear tell his foot print was found on her dress.
 
Gentlemen, and others:

The comments on Senator Teddy are amusing, and likely on point, however let's not forget that he and the other sponsors constitute a dangerous combination. this legislation needs to die, and the sun set should be maintained, here, as with the Assault Weapons Ban.

By the way, with respect to the huge Omnibus Spending Bill, wending it's way through The Congress, be careful for who knows what might be added to it, in the margins, in the dead of night, by party or parties unknown..
 
Point well taken Alan. Still, its nice to know the Senator is held in such high disregard here!
And despite the fact that he is not much more than a lying, drunk, scumbag power monger who seeks to destroy the Constitution to his own liking, it absolutely baffles me that he can be re-elected time after time, along with his loser friends.
THAT, is one powerful and dangerous political machine.
As much as I hate to say it, I'd rather skip a few Judgeship appointees and let these fools blow their gas all over the House until the assault weapons ban DOES sunset.
Here's to hi cap magazines and bayonet studs and flash hiders:D
 
Jim March:

The lady does seem to have a way with words.

Delmar:

In the Boston area, the proverbial YELLOW DOG could likely get elected, if it were named Kennedy. Just remember the following, if you will. Once upon a time, the Mayor of Boston was a Mr. Curley, however he spelled his name. In any event Hisonor was charged, indicited and convicted of criminal acts, for which he languished in jail for a time. While there, he ran for RE-ELECTION to the mayor's office, and won.

Now then I suppose that there are places, singular or plural, where if one's name were Goldstein, one could get elected to public office, without regard to how big a bum one was. I just cannot, at the moment, think of the name of such town(s).

Kennedy's ability to get re-elected should be explained by the foregoing. Of course, having a whole bunch of money behind oneself doesn't hurt either.
 
Folks: please attack the senator's positions, his arguments, etc. but keep the personal attacks to a minimum. This isn't a thread about his drinking habits, etc.
 
lets not get started on his positions. He could write a whole new chapter in the Kama Sutra
 
Sorry about that Sven-we should take the High Road when talking about a US Senator.
Any comment as to a relationship between his personal misdeeds as indicative to his professional misconduct and subterfuge?
 
avoidance of ad hominem attacks is generally a good rule- except in the case of Teddy Kennedy.
 
I think personal attacks on public officials/figures should be allowed. :neener:
How about Chuck Schumer & Diane Feinstein?? ....or Sarah Brady?? :barf:

My guns have killed less people than Ten Kennedy's car. :p :evil: :neener:
AND let's not forget about the rape investigation he tried to obstruct in Florida that involved his nephew. :cuss:

OH......and BTW.............I don't like his positions. ;)

I won't mention his drinking. :uhoh:
 
Ted looks like a man who might take a drink. He just has that red-faced "boozer" look about him that screams alchoholic.
 
Sen. Kennedy
Yep he is a public offical. Comes from a Family with some tragedies, politics, and interesting history. I actually shook hands with his brother JFK, a yr before history was made in TX.

For those that are younger, or those that don't know, for an interesting read of one America's Political families do some research on How the Kennedy's Family Fortune was made. You might search key words such as "prohibition", "Canada" , and "depression".

No, not fan of the Sen. Do not like his politics. Being as this is THR and in L&P a little reseach on history is a good thing.
;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top