Sensible Gun Registration Plan That Will Work

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ditchtiger

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
886
Location
Junction City,OR
Sensible Gun Registration Plan That Will Work

Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the

U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and

his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in

New England and elsewhere.

Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require

them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state

to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of

$500 for the privilege of not owning a gun.

Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming

the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He

believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution

as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals.

Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms

for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously

scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says

Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they

are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise."

Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register

their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state.

"There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the

state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says Vermont already boasts a high rate of

gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state .. it's currently the only

state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination

of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation .

" America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."

There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police

protection for people not wanting to own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.

America

Home of the free,

BECAUSE of the Brave.
 
1. This has been posted before.

2. In no way is the Second Amendment a requirement to own or bear arms. If it were such, the Founding Fathers would have expressed such.

3. It's not funny, great, or cool. It's hypocritical. While owning a gun is right, it's also a choice. Penalizing someone for not choosing to excercise a right is just as bad as penalizing them for choosing to exercise that right.
 
That pretty much covers it. "Rights" mean freedom.

Being compelled to exercise a "right" pretty much removes any notion of any freedom.

This is as bad as a complete ban on firearms.

What's next, fines for NOT voting?
 
Didn't come up when I did a search. I hope Rep. Fred Maslack wasn't serious and was just trying to make a point. If there was a jokes and humor section I'd have posted this there.
 
Also, Vermont is not the only state to allow people to carry concealed without a permit; Alaska does as well. Not sure if there are others...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top