4) Alienation of our allies
This is one point people make that I strongly disagree with.
Post 9/11 its time to examine alliances that have been in place since the Cold War. Some of them just have no strategic or geographical importance anymore. The Middle Eaat and Asia are the hot spots now, not Europe, thanks in large part to Islamic terrorism.
Countries like the oft mentioned France, Germany and Russia are not our enemies, as some like to paint them, but neither are they allies (well, I guess Russia never was). They are trading partners that have different
priorities. We should trade freely with them of course, but we need to understand that militarily its best for them that we don't flex our power.
We should stand with our British brothers and recognize the logistics and Special Forces help from allies like Australia and Poland. (And Canada, at least in Afghanistan.)
And if "alienation of allies" means bucking the UN, that Bush had the stones to do that in reason #1 why I will be voting for him. In my opinion, since the Cold War the UN's main mission has been to try and counterbalance US power given the void left by the collapse of the Soviet Union. Trying to keep the US impotent is one of the things that led to 9/11, i.e. "The US is a paper tiger". About time somebody told the UN to go pound sand.
Another thing about allies that is weird right now is that is seems that alliances among democracies may change according to the administration. In the UK, Australia, and Canada there is a goodly percentage of anti-US, leftist protesters who strongly disagree with their governments alliance with us (some members in those countries will have a better feel for it than I). If those administrations are turned out, their relationship militarily with us might be quite different. Also, here in the US, the self proclaimed "The Comeback" Kerry has pledged that he will march hat in hand to the UN begging forgiveness, and has also pledged to restore our "traditional" alliances. So it all seems kinda fluid right now.