Share Federal #1 Flitecontrol buckshot patterning!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cesiumsponge

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
2,266
Location
Washington
I am hoping enough folks have used Federal's LE Flitecontrol #1 buckshot and patterned the stuff so we could share data.

I had a chance to test some of Federal's #1 buckshot with the flitecontrol wadding. It wasn't an extensive test and I did not average the results over multiple shots at the same distance. We showed up early on open land, and did some carbine work. I also took my TRG out to break it's cherry so I had several other goals to accomplish. As the day progressed, more folks showed up so getting a cold range to set up targets (I only had one target stand) became unbearably long for patterning. I didn't feel like spending 10 seconds to fire one round, then wait 15 minutes brushing snow off myself and waiting for a cold range to retrieve a wet paper target, only to repeat the process 25 times if I wanted 5 rounds at each distance. I plan to do a more extensive test when time allows or at a regular range on a weekday.

The testing environment wasn't the best. It was 30-40F with snow flurries at 2490' and everything was getting wet or snowy. This was done out of a Remington 870 express with an 18.5", open cylinder bore. Testing yielded interesting results. The first two shots seemed to have the flitecontrol wad drop out very, very early on. It's arguable the third shot did as well. I'm not sure if this might have anything to do with any snow or water that accumulated in the muzzle while we were setting up. I did testing at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 yards. I should have added 5, 15, 25, and 35 yards with an averaged result.

Here is what I got:
8109754545_446b4c13c0_o.png


Target 1 at 10 yards:
This was the first shot. It seems the shotcup and pellets had separated very early on and the wadding was unstable. I'm guessing the bore being wet with snow and water offered some sort of resistance or obstruction which caused the wadding to go wonky and drop out of flight early on. The wadding hit the target sideways, and you can see some gunpowder smudges from the flitecontrol wad fingers striking the upper right of the paper. The shot is too dense to count but it forms a 1.65" grouping with several fliers that opened up the group.


Target 2 at 20 yards:
I shot at this target twice. After firing once and getting another premature shotcup separation and a shot pattern, I was feeling let down by the Flitecontrol stuff. I shot at it once more and perhaps that was enough to get rid of any excess moisture in the bore from the snow. At least...I'm willing to hang onto this as a working hypothesis as I didn't experience this problem anymore. The first shot shows premature shotcup seperation. All 15 #1 pellets are accounted for and form a concentrated 3.6" grouping, which opens up to just under 6" with the two low-hitting pellets. The second shot which was fired exhibited a single ragged hole, with shot entering at the top of the oblong hole and indications the shotcup impacted the paper target sideways. It doesn't appear the shotcup tilting sideways opened up the shot. It passed as a single mass.

Target 3 at 20 yards:
I decided to do one more shot. I pulled the shot but it entered the target clean. There are speckled holes from buffering materials. It looks like the wadding entered at an angle, leaving an oblong hole. Still one ragged hole with no indications of a spreading pattern.

Target 4 at 30 yards:
Another single ragged hole. Slight tilt of the shotcup. Buffering materials have slowed down enough that they don't make it this far or don't punch through the paper. I'm not sure if this is typical or prolonged shotcup flight because the shot opens a LOT between 30 and 40 yards with a sampling of one round.

Target 5 at 40 yards:
Big difference betwen 30 and 40 yards. The shotcup doesn't make it to the target. The patterning opened from nothing to the width of the target. I should have done one at 35 yards and find the intermediate point between shot being in the cup and it opening up. It's also possible that the 30 yard shot was a fluke and the wadding drops out earlier than this, typically. Like I mentioned above, I didn't do an average at each distance so one shot is hardly representative of what should happen. 14 of 15 pellets accounted for. One of the flyers misses the target with two other pellets in the D-zone. Most of the pellets are in the A-C zone of an IPSC.

Target 6 at 50 yards:
Only 11 of 15 pellets hit the paper, so four go missing. 10 of 15 hit the target, surprisingly most centered quite well without a donut pattern or any gaps. It isn't useful at this range but it's nice to see how it performs at extended range.
 
The BoxOTruth guys did the same test and got similar results. That's one of the best buck loads around now.
 
That stuff is hard to find around here I found 1 box of #00 buck personal protection stuff with flight control wads Fired all 5 rounds at 25 yards out of a 1977 vintage H&R mod. 162 buck slug gun no choke . It put all 9 pellets on a 9" paper plate all 5 shots
Flight control wads make this gun an all around gun I love this gun it is light short and powerful (on both ends) But for woods roamer who carries a lot and shoots a little it works blackcloud steel shoots full choke patterns prairiestorm lead throws shot like a modified choke and the buckshot should ruin a coyote's day I just wish federal would make some loads in stanard velosities/shot weight with this wad
Roy
 
A gal at Federal told me they work best with IC or mod, and complements well with their truball slug. I'm considering a mod barrel for my next rig so I can run flitecontrol and truball exclusively and sill get decent patterns if I had to use something else in a pinch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top