The results are in..
and while interesting, are also kind of disappointing.
On to the pics:
Test subjects "A" and "B". Your average deer park water bottles. One filled with NN fluid, the other filled with tap water; both to the same level.
Subjects were set at a distance of 25 yards. In an attempt to catch the bullet I placed a rather thick stump behind the water bottle. The bullet passed directly through and was lost.
The NN fluid bottle was set in front of my DO-ALL bullet trap box, which stopped the bullet and also disintegrated it enough where it wasn't valid in the "experiment" anymore.
The round used was CCI's Small Game Bullet, or SGB. These little buggers zip along fast enough to put a nice dimple in my swinger targets from 50 yards.
The rifle used was my new Savage Mark II BTV:
The results were less than spectacular, but interesting nonetheless.
While the "exit wounds" were the same on both test subjects, as seen here:
The entry wounds were quite different. The water filled bottle had split in the front similarly to the rear in a lateral direction from the bullet hole. The NN filled bottle had a clean hole with no splitting of the bottle occurring, as seen here:
My theory is when the bullet first struck the bottle, the fluid changed to a rubbery solid which supported the plastic of the bottle but wasn't solid enough to stop the bullet or transmit enough energy to break apart. After the bullet strike, the NN fluid just leaked from the bottle like paint.
Silly putty might be a little more visually entertaining since it is already fairly solid and, from hearing about the sledgehammer incident, gets pretty hard pretty fast.
The only problem would be getting enough silly putty to fill a water bottle. Could get expensive..