Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Shooting the .50BMG

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by ar10, Apr 10, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ar10

    ar10 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,356
    I had the opportunity to shoot a Barrett last Sunday at 300yds, (sorry we don't have a 3 mile range). The boss took it out to see how it did in really strong crosswinds gusting to 40~45mph. It didn't even phase it. Shooting it is no worse than a 12ga for the shooter, however the spotter behind tends to catch all sort of hell. It creates a very big dust storm traveling very fast smacking you in the face.
    Shooting the .50BMG is fun, spotting, not so much.
     
  2. iamkris

    iamkris Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,839
    Location:
    My own little slice of Purgatory
    That's my experience with my BOHICA 50 BMG as well. About like a 12 ga slug. a very hard shove versus being whacked.
     
  3. dubbleA

    dubbleA Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,410
    Location:
    Tejas del sur
    It helps alot if the spotter can be directly behind the shooter and be as low as possible. The worst place to be is on either side of the shooter due to the tremendous muzzle blast.

    Not a great pic but you can see the blast and fire clearly coming from the sides of the brake.

    [​IMG]
     
  4. ar10

    ar10 Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,356
    I saw that fire just before the dust cloud hit, and about the same instant my spotting scope decided to leave the range.
    Just curious, who was in front of the muzzle you got that picture.:confused:
     
  5. bpl

    bpl Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    927
    Location:
    PA
    Hopefully just a camera on a tripod!!
     
  6. dubbleA

    dubbleA Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,410
    Location:
    Tejas del sur
    This was a still pulled from a video and yes the camera was on a tripod and was remotely controlled. This is the reason for the poor quality pic.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page