Shootrite Katana

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eustachius234

Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2009
Messages
134
Location
Singapore, Occupied Texas & Elsewhere
Any opinions on the rifle described below? Does it sound any better then a standard 16" colt, lmt, noveske or stag?

Skill Set: The Shootrite Katana
by Tiger McKee


After about 30 years of research, study, and training I've finally figured out what works well for a general-purpose carbine; after numerous requests from students and readers I've also decided to bring this rifle to market. My mission statement: Create a fighting carbine that is lightweight and simple to operate. The maxim guiding me: Effectiveness is a result of simplicity - maximize the potential of the fighting carbine through simplification. The result: The Shootrite Katana, the "short-sword" for today's Samurai.

The Katana is unique from anything else being offered on the market today. Words like "incredible," "impressive," and "amazing" have been used to describe it. Instead of the common trends associated with today's complicated AR's - heavy barrels, thick railed handguards, vertical fore-grips, tactical slings, folding sights, collapsible stocks, complicated lights ... - the Katana is a lightweight fighting rifle based on the M16/AR's original concepts, but updated using modern components.

The Katana weighs in at just over five pounds and is equipped with a thin 16-inch barrel. It's short enough to handle in tight quarters, light enough to train or carry all day without muscle fatigue, more than accurate enough for a fighting rifle, and is quick to maneuver. The Katana's carbon fiber handguards are lightweight and virtually indestructible, and have a rail for mounting a flashlight in the proper location. Like the original AR the upper receiver doesn't have an external forward assist. The original forward assist is the concave cutout in the exposed section of the bolt carrier. To seat the bolt you simply place a finger in the cutout and press forward. "When you get a cartridge that won't seat in a rifle," according to Stoner, "and you deliberately drive it in, usually you are buying yourself more trouble." (The Black Rifle, Vol. 3, pg. 129.)

The flattop upper is equipped with fixed front and rear iron sights. These sights can be used as a primary system, or if your red-dot optic fails, especially during a fight, you don't have to take time to flip up a rear or front sight. The rear sight has an original A1 type drum for windage adjustments; an elevation drum is unnecessary on a fighting rifle.

The Katana's bolt is "blue-printed" to insure reliable operation, and has a solid one-piece firing pin retaining pin, instead of a split cotter pin, and long-lasting chrome silicon extractor and ejector springs to insure clean extraction and ejections.

The lower receiver uses tried and true mil-spec components. On a fighting rifle you don't want a match, competition or adjustable trigger. Under the stress of an actual fight a three-pound trigger will feel like three ounces, plus the positive trigger reset, which you get with the standard components, is a good thing. The Katana's DuckBill Tactical Grip smoothes out the sharp corner between the grip and trigger guard, allowing you to handle and manipulate the weapon without chewing a ragged hole in your middle finger. As for stocks two options are available - either an A1 fixed stock, the best for most applications, or a Magpul retractable stock, in case your application requires an adjustable length stock.

The final details of the Shootrite Katana will be coming after the first of the year, and the very first announcement will be on the Tactical and Shooting Wires. There will also be reviews coming out in most of your favorite shooting magazines. So if you're thinking about buying an AR, hold off a little while. I don't think you'll be disappointed.
 
it's unclear why it took 30 yrs to reach that conclusion :)

my initial reaction is as usual, "the more the merrier" and i wish thousands more people would come out with new AR15s. heck, i'd offer one myself (if i could get around that FFL thing...). But with colt 6920s selling in the $1100 range, i hope his gun skills are better than his market timing :)


the devil's in the details, of course, which "will be coming after the first of the year"

i'm a big fan of light carbines. However, just because DPMS, RRA and company make boat anchors as their standard models, doesn't mean light AR15s are unique.
 
I think it sounds like a great idea, it's just not anything new. I agree with taliv, this is a horrible time to be getting into the AR manufacturing business.
 
Other rejected names:

Get 'er Done Chansawie

Blastec Shoot 'em Up

Sierra Buick Cutlass

and lastly

Kapowie Von Zapper

marketing, it appears, is everything.
 
Honestly, who has ever complained that their ar-15 had a bolt assist.
I know people were complaining that it didnt have one.
so removing a desired object makes it better?
 
it's understandable. given a choice, i'd rather save an ounce or two by removing something i'll never use. also, while rare, there are a couple reports of them breaking and causing stoppages.

i'm on board with the standard trigger, but i really don't like the fixed rear sights or A1 stock, and i'm eager to see what the proper location is for the flashlight.
 
I'm still not sold on the removal of the bolt assist,
I like the idea of making it simpler, but it seems like they just took a modified lady-15 and put it on a milspec lower.
and I'm also curious where the correct point for a light should be, I'm probably way off with my mounted ones
 
I hate the forward assist. I removed mine and put in a plastic plug. The space in the bolt carrier works just fine. I was at the Outdoor Expo at Ben Avery two years ago and watched a S&W M&P have a total lockup. My son shot the gun and it jammed. (they were shooting wolf ammo) One of range guys hit the forward assist. He made it unusable. I think if he would have done a double feed fix it would have kept shooting: lock the bolt to the back, rip out the magazine, clear the rounds, reload and shoot.
 
It seems to me that one of the great strengths of the AR15 is modularity; so I've never understood why some people want to go backwards and make it less modular. The fixed A1 rear sight and the rail "in the proper place" may be just perfect for how he teaches carbine and/or his personal preference; but it is necessarily going to limit the market for the rifle to people that agree with his choices.

Given how many people are in the AR market right now, I don't know that consciously limiting people's options is going to be a successful marketing niche. However, it is always good to have one more guy out there trying to improve the system.
 
Sounds cool to me, but to my mind, the Katana should be a 20", and the 16" should be called the Wakizashi, since they wanted to name it after the short sword.
 
I've handled the prototype and it handles better in the real world than on paper or electrons. Tiger runs a great school that is basically Thunder Ranch east, though I'm sure he's modified some of the doctrine.

The light weight is very noticeable - I have a CMMG mid length and it was appreciably heavier. In my years of active duty as an Infantry guy, I never saw a malfunction that was cured with the forward assist. Tiger and (at least) Pat Rodgers have quit advising anyone to use the forward assist as you usually make a simple problem worse.

One of Tiger's skills is thinking things through. Will I'm not him and the article didn't say, the light was at the ten o'clock position on his personal rifle.

I now have one AR with an M16A1 stock and prefer it. I have another with a collapsible stock for transport advantages. The Katana can come with either. :)
 
I like the idea of losing the forward assist. It's a vestigial component. In a decade of shooting AR's, I've used the forward assist on a rifle two, maybe three times, and that was with questionable remanufactured ammo.

A permanently attached rear sight, however, strikes me as a bad idea. Rock River Arms already sells a rifle like this, and it looks like it would hamper the utility of the picatinny rail, especially if you intend to attach an optic like the ACOG TA-11.

I'd be interested to see a better photo of the rifle, especially the "duck billed grip." They are right about the interface between the grip and the trigger guard being less than optimal, especially if you have to manipulate the gun with one hand, such as when executing a reload on the run.

Overall, their concept has some good ideas, though from my read of the article, the gun sounds like it would make for a good no-frills entry-level defensive carbine designed to be combat accurate. A reasonable price point of around $900-$1000 might make it a good value.
 
Tiger (IMHO) will make the rifle out of premium components. The big thing is that this will be an ultra-light carbine that would work great for actual field use.
 
I have alot of respect for Tiger, and his school. i am sure that he is gonna use the best parts and it is gonna be a very reliable and hard use gun. however what i have works for me and my needs, and i am good. but it is always a good thing to have another option out there. someone might want or need or think the need something like this and that is totally fine in my book.
 
hey,
the light was at the ten o'clock position on his personal rifle.

my light is in the 2 o'clock position, but then, i'm left handed
 
One of the neat things about Tiger is that he thinks his way through issues and problems. I did not agree with a couple of his techniques, but I was impressed anyway with his efforts to go beyond the "binary switch" approach to problem solving. :)

One of the reasons for the ten or two, was to have the shadow footprint in the best place possible on the target. The thought is that the critical things to watch are the hands, head and waist line. Ten or two seems to work best for that TTP.
 
my logic was based on
how i like to hold the gun ---> puts my thumb right there ----> so put the back of the light right in front of that

also

when i hold the gun in low ready, so as not to necessarily point the gun at what i'm looking at, i like the light on top
 
Sounds a lot like mine, except without the carbon fiber.

carbines.jpg
 
hey,
Quote:
the light was at the ten o'clock position on his personal rifle.
my light is in the 2 o'clock position, but then, i'm left handed
I like my light at the 4:00 position. I can operate it with my 1st or middle fingers, but it's out of the way of the sling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top