Shotgun experiment came up short

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Shotgun experiment came up short
By Don Lewis
Outdoors Columnist
Friday, September 30, 2005

Although the rifle has always been a big game rig, back in the 1920s or early 30s, an attempt was made to make shotguns suitable for big game hunting, at least at close range. Ammunition makers cranked out shotshells using a single round ball of lead. The punkin’ ball shell was loaded to somewhat higher velocities than regular shotshells. The lead ball had the diameter and weight to kill many species of large game-provided it could be placed in the chest area. It was a common round prior to World War II, and hundreds of hunters in the bleak Great Depression era got their deer with the ol’ punkin’ ball.

While it had the kinetic energy to kill a deer or black bear at ranges well under 100 yards, it lacked in the accuracy column, especially at distances beyond 40 yards. However, there is a ballistic reason for the lead ball’s errant flight.

Back then, the shotgun’s bore was a smooth tube. There were no rifling in the bore to make the projectile rotate, although it’s unlikely rotating the ball would have make it more accurate. In contrast, a rifle’s barrel has lands and grooves and as the elongated bullet passes through the bore, the rifling causes it to spin at a very fast rate. When it exits the muzzle, a rifle’s elongated bullet can be rotating several hundred thousand times a minute, The rifling is measured by turns per inch. For example, a one in seven twists means the bullet makes a complete rotation in the bore every seven inches, and that’s a very fast twist. At velocities in the 3,000 feet per second range, the bullet is turning around 300,000 times a minute.

The round (not elongated) punkin’ ball is slightly smaller than the bore and simply passes through it more or less bouncing from side to side. It doesn’t turn like a rifle’s bullet and consequently it is not stabilized. High rotation causes a bullet to be stabilized, and this holds the bullet on a true course.

There have been many new developments regard-ing the shotgun slug. After World War II, the rifle slug was popular. This was an elongated bullet, that had angled fins swaged on it. The fins were supposed to make the slug rotate, but not at sufficient revolutions per minute to stabilize the elongated slug.

Admittedly, the old Foster-type slug and one called the Brenneke were more accurate than the round ball, but not enough to make the shotgun an accurate big game outfit it, especially at long ranges.

Today, there are newer developments. First and foremost is the rifled shotgun barrel. Gun manufacturers are now putting rifling in shotgun barrels that are designed primarily for slug shooting.

Several ammunition makers are producing a new type of elongated bullet generally known as a sabot slug. The new slug carries an hourglass configuration and is surrounded by two plastic halves. The sabot fits tightly in the bore sealing off the hot gases behind it. The sabot also grips the rifling (lands and grooves) forcing the slug to rotate at a high RPM. The old punkin’ ball and rifled slug had little semblance of balance or precision. They were just large hunks of lead. That’s not the case with some of the sabot projectiles. They are held to close tolerances and they are more accurate than their predecessors.

In tests I conducted a few years back using sabot typed shotgun projectiles printed three-shot groups under three inches at 100 yards. The old punkin’ ball and rifled slug were hard pressed to even come close to that measurement at 50 yards. Along with a higher degree of accuracy, the sabot bullet is extending the effective killing range from 75 yards of the old slugs to well over 100 yards. It is claimed that the day is not too far away when the rifled shotgun barrel will shoot two-inch groups at 150 yards.

(Don Lewis is a long time outdoor writer for the Leader Times.)

http://pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/trib/newssummary/s_379516.html
 
drizzt,

I'd have to disagree with your author's title, which he goes a long way toward disproving in the body of his own article IMHO.

Despite the legend of the Pennsylvania/Kentucky/Hawken type rifles, THE most used gun on the American frontier was the relatively inexpensive smoothbore 'fowling piece,' often enough converted from old military muskets. The fowler was a versatile gun, like the modern shotgun, and could launch a cloud of small shot at small game, or a charge of buckshot at larger game/intruders, or a single ball (or often a combination buck and ball load) at big game or attackers. I know some primitive re-enactor type folks who still have quite a love affair with their fowlers and are very good with them. They were quite successful in their day, within their admitted limitations, and still are. It's interesting how improvements in a person's fieldcraft can make up for shortcomings in their technology.

We moderns are so much better off technologically, having the advancements of waterproof cartridges, centerfire noncorrosive priming, smokeless powder, repeating breechloader firearms designs- there is just no comparison. It is admittedly difficult to get reliable hits on small targets much past 100 yards even with a sighted smoothbore and rifled slugs, but that is good enough IF the hunter is good enough. And it is hard to make a case for a genuine self defense situation exceeding a range of 100 yards or so, and thus the most telling role of the modern smoothbore- that of home defense- is secure IMO.

Stay safe,

lpl/nc
 
Considering the amount of venison I've fed to the family over the decades that was provided by smoothbores and slugs, I have to agree with Lee.

Again.....

I've also ML'd a couple deer with round balls. Shotgun slugs beat even the mighty 58 caliber RB at terminal effects.

And at typical Eastern deer hunting ranges, the limitations of the slug and launch system pose little handicap to those of us who know how to use wind, location and knowledge of the prey to get close enough.
 
...and no mention of how the SG was corralled into a role where a centerfire rifle would be better suited. State governments that sectioned off parts of states or forced entire states to hunt large game with shotguns.

With rifled SG barrels and experienced shooters I know of hunters that have deer taken at 170 yards. Sure, a flat shooting .308 or even a light recoiling .243 would have been ideal for a sub 200yd shot, but in southern MI it is verboten. While I'd like to take the ol' .30-30 Winchester out on Nov. 15, I am forced to tote the SG.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top