the naked prophet
Member
I recently took out both the mossberg 500 and the AK clone I have, to shoot both at the range. (Mossberg 500 is 18.5 inch barrel "protector" model or something like that, with synthetic stock and forearm - AK is WASR-10 with collapsible stock and Kobra red dot sight) I can get accurate hits much, much faster with my AK. Not to mention, practice ammo is cheaper, as is the ammo I keep for defense (Win. Super-X softpoints vs. Remington #1 buck).
Is this a bad thing? I've always kept a shotgun close by the bed, but it just seems like I can't afford to practice enough with the shotgun to get good enough that I can justify keeping it next to the bed rather than the AK.
I like shotguns, and they seem more American. I just don't do as well with it. If I was taking a training course for self-defense, I feel that I would come out in the upper half of a carbine class, and the bottom rung of a shotgun class. I can't realistically afford both within a reasonable time frame, and my wife would participate with me in the carbine class but not the shotgun class. So the question is, do I take a shotgun class and get up to speed, or take a carbine class with my wife and become proficient?
Or is the whole question silly?
Is this a bad thing? I've always kept a shotgun close by the bed, but it just seems like I can't afford to practice enough with the shotgun to get good enough that I can justify keeping it next to the bed rather than the AK.
I like shotguns, and they seem more American. I just don't do as well with it. If I was taking a training course for self-defense, I feel that I would come out in the upper half of a carbine class, and the bottom rung of a shotgun class. I can't realistically afford both within a reasonable time frame, and my wife would participate with me in the carbine class but not the shotgun class. So the question is, do I take a shotgun class and get up to speed, or take a carbine class with my wife and become proficient?
Or is the whole question silly?