Nope, not right.
Parralex is an optical issue. It is the error between where the target appears in the scope and where the physical center is. Basically the image of the target is focused on an imaginary plane inside the scope. That plane is at a slightly different loacation depending on how far away the target is and the magnification of the scope. When your eye isn't centered in the scope there is a slight error introduced bcause you are looking at a little bit of an angle "across" the gap between the crosshairs and the image. Think of somebody misreading the speedo in a car from the passengers seat and you get the idea, the needle isn't in the same plane as the numbers. When the plane of the image is at the same plane as the cross hairs, the parralex is zero. Some scopes, usually target scopes, have adjustable parralex. Others have it set for a specific distance. For most rifle scopes, that will be 100 to 150 yards. For a shotgun scope that is further than you will shoot, so they set it for 50 or 75 yards.
The error starts growing at longer ranges, but is less for low power scopes. But is usually less than an inch at practicle ranges. Unless you are going to try a lot of shooting at longer than 300 yards, it still seems like a good option to me.
PS I am not a lawyer, optician, or a physicist.