rugerman07
Member
The supreme court has ruled the 2nd amendment protects an individuals right to keep and bear arms. Why did it take a supreme court ruling to interpert the meaning of the 2nd amendment? It is very simply stated, the right of the people, to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. What part of that phrase does our government not understand? Did the comma's throw them off?
With that said, do you think guns should even be a political issue? Do we, as freedom loving americans need our elected officials to decide what's best for us? Are we not mature enough to decide that on our own? Are we still school kids and our government is our parents? Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't our government suppose to support us, not control us?
What business is it of our government how many guns we have? You could kill someone just as dead with a knife, hammer, baseball bat, etc., and none of those are regulated.
Am I missing something here?
With that said, do you think guns should even be a political issue? Do we, as freedom loving americans need our elected officials to decide what's best for us? Are we not mature enough to decide that on our own? Are we still school kids and our government is our parents? Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't our government suppose to support us, not control us?
What business is it of our government how many guns we have? You could kill someone just as dead with a knife, hammer, baseball bat, etc., and none of those are regulated.
Am I missing something here?