SHould I buy a Springfield or a Kimber?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 24, 2003
Messages
245
Location
Texas boy on loan to the USN
I know this topic has been covered someplace, but, I’m looking for specific good or bad experiences with either (or both) models of weapons. I’m down to a 1911 choice of either the Springfield Champion (SS) or the Kimber Pro Carry (SS). These two models represent what I want in a defense 1911 and are also within my price range. I’m hoping some people have experience with these specific weapons, but general brand name experience is also welcome. Thanks!
 
I would vote for Kimber, because every Kimber I have shot and everyone my friends and family have shot have performed beautifully. Unfortunately I cannot say the same about Springfields. I don't know if I would worry so much about the series II. If it bothers you then go ahead and get a series I or the Springfield.
 
My Pro Carry is scary accurate and has been very reliable after I fixed the slide stop (kept locking back the slide with rounds still in the mag).

If this is to be more of a range than a carry gun, I'd vote for the HD model. The lighter weight carries extremely well and it's easy to shoot but an extended range session starts to take a toll on me.
 
I've had better luck with my Springfield than the Kimbers I owned, think I got a lemon both times. I don't think you can go wrong either way.
 
I have the Kimber Pro Cary HD. It is my cary gun. I have had no problems with it other than a magazine feeding problem. (corrected now) I've had no "custom" work done to it. It works right out of the box for me.

I have shot a springfield. Not sure if it is he same model that you are interested in. I liked the way it shot to. Plus a little easier take down (at first compared to the kimber method) But I can break mine down pretty quick now.

I think either Brand is good. Go with what you are comfortable with. The Kimber just felt perfect in my hands compared to the comparable Springfields.

...Dave
 
I've owned a Springfield Mil-Spec and currently own a pre-Series II Kimber Custom, both five-inch pistols. Both are really strong, reliable performers, I happen to have more range-time in with the Kimber than I ever did the Springfield. I'm considering another Mil-Spec as my next 1911 acquisition. I'd be as comfortable using one for defense as the other, personally.

I suspect you'll be soundly pleased whichever you select. Use quality magazines and, if carrying, use good leather or Kydex gear.

Enjoy! :)
 
I have a MilSpec SA.Bad extractor and the worst customer service in the world.After a two month run around I ended up buying a McCormick extractor and put it in myself.I own a couple dozen hand guns and it is the only one I wouldn't trust my life with.After researching my troubles with the gun and the company I found the extractor trouble is common and the company is hit or miss.

My next 1911 will be a Colt or Kimber.CW
 
I have both and like them both. I would give the nodd to Kimber if you don't mind the extra cost. My most recent purchase is a Pro Carry HDII in 38 Super. One trip to the range and it became my favorite 1911. The Pro Carry's have this very heavy bull barrel--the thickest at the muzzle I have seen on any pistol period. The result is almost no muzzle rise and tremendous accuracy. The gun is so tight that the slide is difficult to rack. The first mag through required me to reach up with my thumb and push the slide closed. After around 15 rounds it stopped doing that and performed flawlessly with zero malfunctions from that point on. It easily tears one ragged hole with all 9 rounds at 15 yds. God I love a good 1911!

Now mind you my Springfields are accurate and reliable, but they do not have the fit or finish quality of the Kimber. Of course that probably would not be true of a TRP. My Loaded Operator is not nearly as well done as my Kimber Pro Carry. I am already contemplating what I need to part with to get one of the new limited run 10mm models. Kimber had my number when they decided to do that! Either that or convert a .40 Pro Carry. That would be really slick.

GR

PS I cannot tell that the series II issue matters. Easy enough to remove those parts if you care to. SAs have those stupid trigger lock thingys now anyway. Lawyer + Gun never equals a good idea.
 
Have you had a chance to shoot these guns? Both will be good performers so it may come down to personal preference & which one you like best. I've owned a Colt & a Springfield & have shot Kimbers. Each one will serve you well.
 
I think the choice between those two comes down to the "little" things, since they are basically the same gun.

Which gun looks better to you? Fit, finish of the two individual guns you are looking at. It varies by sample.

Which sight do you like best? They are different.

Do you want a firing pin safety? Pros and cons and I'm not getting into that discussion.

How important are warranties to you? Springfield has a lifetime, Kimber does not but seems to service their customers.

Both will work so you really can't make a bad decision, just what's important to you.
 
I would vote for Springfield, because every Springfield I have shot and everyone my friends and family have shot have performed beautifully. Unfortunately I cannot say the same about Kimbers.
 
I would vote for Kimber, because every Kimber I have shot and everyone my friends and family have shot have performed beautifully. Unfortunately I cannot say the same about Springfileds.:D

I own and shoot both. Prefer the Kimbers. Nothing wrong with the Springfields a little extractor tuning didn't fix.
 
I have not shot a springfield, but I own a Kimber procarry and I love it! No problems with it what so ever. This is my favorite gun, of the ones I have, or have shot so far. Great feel to me, and very accurate.
 
Get a Honda :p

Seriously, between Kimber and Springy, you're going to hear the same things--"I have a so and so and it sucked, it wouldn't work no matter how many times I sent it back..." and "I have the so and so and it works great, never had a problem," then someone else has the exact opposite results. I'd get whichever one appeals to you more, everyone else's opinions aside. Both companies have pretty good warranties, and only you can decide if you can live with a Series II safety, MIM, etc....
 
Ok, so, what exactly are these “Series II†and “MIM†issues? I understand that there are/could be problems with the mechanics of the S2 safety, but what exactly could this lead to? Also, heard a lot of bad reviews concerning the SA customer service, what’s the skinny on that?
 
The Kimber utilizes what is known as "Series II" or "Shwartz" firing pin safety. Many don't like this as it adds extra, potentially fragile parts to the gun and in the Kimbers with smaller barrels, many claim it causes reliability problems. It would be best to do a search on MIM parts to avoid a big metallurgial debate. In my view they are okay for some parts like beavertails and mag catches but not high-stressed parts like slide stops or extractors. SA has good customer service, but often-times spotty quality control. They will usually make a problem right. Can't offer much advice about Kimber's customer service.
 
Out of the guns Ive owned/shot alot/stolen/borrowed and begged to get..Id take the Kimber. A pre series 2 is nice..but not really necessary.
I know guys who have a gizzillion rounds through their Series 2 guns and not a hiccup.
Never mind...get an STI...:D
Shoot well
 
I've owned both. I've shot many examples of both. I've handled many more examples of both. I prefer the Kimber. Fit and finish have always been better with the Kimbers. On average, reliability seems a little better too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top