chaim
Member
I'm not a big .40S&W fan. I don't want to start a caliber war on this thread, it is a decent enough round- it just doesn't do it for me. I'm perfectly comfortable with good quality defensive 9mm ammo and cheap .40S&W is no where near as cheap as practice 9mm ammo, .40S&W is about the same price as .45acp and I by far prefer .45 to .40 for either fun or defense. So for me having a decent .45 and 9mm means that the .40 doesn't really serve a purpose.
Anyway, I have a CZ 40B which I do like quite a bit but I don't really use that much (not in small part due to the chambering).
As a range gun there are certainly better options. First, I'm simply not as accurate with this as my other CZ (or as my S&W revolvers or my 1911). Also, it does have the shorter barrel (4.4") and lighter alloy frame (29oz) in comparison to the full sized CZs causing it to lose a bit as a range gun.
I may go to grad school in a carry state (hopefully next year- I'm in the process of applying), about a 50-50 chance I'll end up in a carry state for grad school anyway, so I've been thinking about carry guns. I've got a few guns I can carry, heck I am big enough that a full sized 1911 or CZ would probably be ok, but I could use a good smaller belt gun in case I end up in a CCW state (my S&W 65LS will probably be most used for that but an auto would be nice). I kinda figured the CZ 40 could fill that role but, possibly being closer to actually needing it, I'm not so sure it is an improvement over the full sized CZs. It is alloy so it is lighter, but the full sized 75s aren't that heavy (28 or 29oz v. 33 or 34), and it is a little shorter but not by much (4.4" barrel v. 4.7 or 4.8). So I could either go with a full sized 75 for more accuracy or something significantly smaller and/or lighter for more carry ease.
The gun itself does fit me well, but no where near as well as an actual 1911 or CZ 75B. Another problem for me is with the .40S&W chambering which is harder recoiling v. 9mm, or sharper recoiling v. .45 causing it to have less ideal (for me) handling characteristics (this part would be a non-issue for someone who actually prefers .40 to 9mm of whom there are many, or to .45 of whom there are a few). Both of these are potential issues for carry and for target use.
Basically it is only a slightly cut down full sized gun. Thus it really isn't ideal for either target use or carry. Good gun, decent middle ground- but I have plenty of better target options (and there are better target options I'd consider to replace it) and I could use a better carry option (well, about a 50-50 chance of that)
Now don't get me wrong, I do actually really like the gun, it is just that (for me) it is a compromise on a few levels that I'm no longer sure about going with the compromise. I have limited funds until I finish grad school and I have several wants and even some needs I'd like to fill before I go. If I had more money I'd probably indulge and keep this gun but since that may keep me from some of the other needs and wants that are stonger than my desire to keep this one I'm thinking strongly about trading.
I know, you should never trade a reliable gun that you are happy with. I'm actually usually one of the first to say this. However, I really don't use it much, and I would be trading it on something that would make a lot more sense for me.
I would trade it on either the CZ 100 in 9mm (for another 9mm gun but something a little different- I don't yet have a polymer pistol, plus it is light and very narrow, a great carry gun), a CZ 75BD (I love my 75B and I love the SA safety, but since I'm thinking about grad school in a carry state next year and even though I can, and sometimes do, lower the hammer on a loaded cartridge I'd prefer the decocker for DA when I chose to go DA and I already have the 75B for SA carry), a P01 (though, horrors, it didn't impress me as much as I expected and seems a bit overpriced), and a CZ 97 (I've long wanted one and it would be a great target gun).
There are one or two non-CZ options I'll think about if I trade. I've had my eye on a Taurus 450 (2" .45lc snub) for some time. I'd love the new Taurus 905 (2" 9mm snub). The S&W 908 is economical, 9mm and just about the perfect size for a belt gun (3 1/2", 24oz). There are a few others as well, however I don't think I can bring myself to trade a CZ for anything but another CZ.
Anyway, advice and comments would be greatly appreciated.
Anyway, I have a CZ 40B which I do like quite a bit but I don't really use that much (not in small part due to the chambering).
As a range gun there are certainly better options. First, I'm simply not as accurate with this as my other CZ (or as my S&W revolvers or my 1911). Also, it does have the shorter barrel (4.4") and lighter alloy frame (29oz) in comparison to the full sized CZs causing it to lose a bit as a range gun.
I may go to grad school in a carry state (hopefully next year- I'm in the process of applying), about a 50-50 chance I'll end up in a carry state for grad school anyway, so I've been thinking about carry guns. I've got a few guns I can carry, heck I am big enough that a full sized 1911 or CZ would probably be ok, but I could use a good smaller belt gun in case I end up in a CCW state (my S&W 65LS will probably be most used for that but an auto would be nice). I kinda figured the CZ 40 could fill that role but, possibly being closer to actually needing it, I'm not so sure it is an improvement over the full sized CZs. It is alloy so it is lighter, but the full sized 75s aren't that heavy (28 or 29oz v. 33 or 34), and it is a little shorter but not by much (4.4" barrel v. 4.7 or 4.8). So I could either go with a full sized 75 for more accuracy or something significantly smaller and/or lighter for more carry ease.
The gun itself does fit me well, but no where near as well as an actual 1911 or CZ 75B. Another problem for me is with the .40S&W chambering which is harder recoiling v. 9mm, or sharper recoiling v. .45 causing it to have less ideal (for me) handling characteristics (this part would be a non-issue for someone who actually prefers .40 to 9mm of whom there are many, or to .45 of whom there are a few). Both of these are potential issues for carry and for target use.
Basically it is only a slightly cut down full sized gun. Thus it really isn't ideal for either target use or carry. Good gun, decent middle ground- but I have plenty of better target options (and there are better target options I'd consider to replace it) and I could use a better carry option (well, about a 50-50 chance of that)
Now don't get me wrong, I do actually really like the gun, it is just that (for me) it is a compromise on a few levels that I'm no longer sure about going with the compromise. I have limited funds until I finish grad school and I have several wants and even some needs I'd like to fill before I go. If I had more money I'd probably indulge and keep this gun but since that may keep me from some of the other needs and wants that are stonger than my desire to keep this one I'm thinking strongly about trading.
I know, you should never trade a reliable gun that you are happy with. I'm actually usually one of the first to say this. However, I really don't use it much, and I would be trading it on something that would make a lot more sense for me.
I would trade it on either the CZ 100 in 9mm (for another 9mm gun but something a little different- I don't yet have a polymer pistol, plus it is light and very narrow, a great carry gun), a CZ 75BD (I love my 75B and I love the SA safety, but since I'm thinking about grad school in a carry state next year and even though I can, and sometimes do, lower the hammer on a loaded cartridge I'd prefer the decocker for DA when I chose to go DA and I already have the 75B for SA carry), a P01 (though, horrors, it didn't impress me as much as I expected and seems a bit overpriced), and a CZ 97 (I've long wanted one and it would be a great target gun).
There are one or two non-CZ options I'll think about if I trade. I've had my eye on a Taurus 450 (2" .45lc snub) for some time. I'd love the new Taurus 905 (2" 9mm snub). The S&W 908 is economical, 9mm and just about the perfect size for a belt gun (3 1/2", 24oz). There are a few others as well, however I don't think I can bring myself to trade a CZ for anything but another CZ.
Anyway, advice and comments would be greatly appreciated.