Sig 1911 traditional compact stainless MIM parts question

Status
Not open for further replies.

speed67racer

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
2
Location
Ohio
I bought new a Sig compact 45 as a carry gun and was wondering how many metal injection molded parts are actually in this gun? Depending on who I'm talking to it is either just the the slide stop and extracter or one guy told me the entire trigger mechanism needed to be replaced. I looked on the Sig custom shop site and they list enhancement that won't void the warranty but my thing is why polish parts that are going to wear out if better is available?? And if the trigger parts need to be replaced what modifications should be done to a gun used for carry? I shoot it at the range every time I take the others out just to stay sharp but I have less than 500 rounds thru it at the moment with no issues and I shoot it well.
 
The Sig 1911 clone has lots of MIM parts.

Why do you feel the need to replace'em if you haven't had any problems? As a rule, if MIM is going to fail, it'll do it early on. If an MIM parts survives 500 cycles, it'll probably last for 50,000.
 
Just for reliability mostly. I rarely sell or trade any firearms and just want a reliable trouble free weapon that will last as long as possible. This probably won't be my last 1911. Just like everything else I usually end up with a few similar guns. Thanks for the feedback. And I love the auto signature!
 
Never had or seen a MIM failure. I shoot my guns hot and hard and A LOT.

Lots of chat on the internet about it, but it really doesn't happen at any level to worry about.
 
I think the evil of MIM is overstated. The SIGs and the Kimbers have no more than their share of lemons. A lot more can go wrong with a 1911 regardless of the MIM parts.
 
I think the evil of MIM is overstated.

This.

In the early days, the quality was hit and miss. Good MIM can be very good. Bad MIM is worse than junk. The problem is that, short of an obvious defect on the surface, it's impossible to determine by eyeballin' it.

A little story.

A friend of mine was concerned with the MIM sear and disconnect in his early "Billboard" 1991A1 so he bought the best stuff and had me swap it out for him, despite my telling him that it probably wasn't an issue. He was adamant, so we proceeded.

In an attempt to allay his fears, I laid the Colt OEM sear on an anvil concave side down and whacked it a few times with a 4-ounce hammer. It didn't shatter, and when I reinstalled it into his pistol and test-fired it. The trigger pull was a little rougher, but it functioned.

It would be hard to imagine the sear suffering that much stress in a hundred thousand normal cycles.

Then, I clamped the disconnect in a vise and whacked it briskly with the same hammer. It bent at about 30 degrees, but it didn't snap like he expected it to.

I have two early 1991A1 Colts that had MIM sears and disconnects as OEM. The pistols are approaching...collectively...400,000 rounds about evenly split. One is still running on the original sear and disconnect. The other on the original sear. I replaced the disconnect at about 75,000 rounds...not because it failed...but because it looked a little worn and I wanted to nip any future problems in the bud.

Colt apparently found a good vendor for its small parts, and stuck with'em. The only MIM part that didn't turn out well for Colt was its experiment with MIM extractors. As far as I know, they're the only manufacturer that gave it a try with extractors. They learned their lesson and went back to barstock extractors shortly after.

In the beginning, Kimber's MIM parts were good...then it went wrong for some reason. I understand that they've since corrected that, and have found a good vendor.

There are some parts that MIM is well suited for...and some that aren't. Most of the horror stories come from the days when MIM was in its infancy. It's improved a lot over the last 20-odd years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top