*Single* clip/loop tuckable holster/gun combos

Status
Not open for further replies.

Snubster

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
191
Location
Boulder, CO
I work in an office environment and have gone through the various typical concealment methods...ankle, pocket, tuckable iwb, normal iwb, smart carry...experimented with shoulder holster, owb w/ covering garment, bellyband, etc. "camp" shirts, polos, sport coats, sweaters, vests, etc.

I think in the end, I've settled with tuckable iwb for me. i have numerous double clip tuckables, like the vm2, CTAC, texas heritage... most of my double clipped holsters are for full size pistols and revolvers.

i think for me, the single clip tuckables work (conceal) best for me. i have two, a galco usa(?) for my .38 j-frames (442 usually), and a tucker cover up for my 3" sp101. both of these work fine, though the 3" sp101 gets heavy by the end of the day...even though I am used to carrying 4" k-frames and steel govt 1911s on *dual* clip tuckables. my 2" sp101 works in the holster too, and doesn't feel as heavy at the end of the day. fwiw, most of my belts are from milt sparks and bell charter oak.

so, for those out there who also carry tuckables with a single clip or loop, what guns are in your holsters? i'd much prefer using a dual loop setup, but i feel having 2 clips...no matter the style (j, c, y, etc.), is too obvious for my particular environment. with a single loop, i can easily cover it up with my blackberry case. i don't want to add another case to my belt line to conceal 2 clips. i guess i'm trying to figure out if i can carry either a bigger revolver or one of my larger semi-autos as well (p239, p220, p228, Colt Govt, G23). I have a Jetfire and P32 as well, but I figure I'd rather take the j-frame. it seems to me revolvers might be easier because the grips tend to be smaller and therefore doesn't print as much. since most of my smaller revos have hogues, the finger grooves tend to make them blend into the shirt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top