SKS Stock Recommendations
- Thread starter The_Armed_Therapist
- Start date
- Status
Analogkid, that SKS is funky! LOL... I mean that in a very neutral way... not sure if I like it or not. I'm really wanting to put Tech Sights on this thing soon, so I'm not sure if the bullpup would fit that. How about I just run it past the wife? LOL
So, what are some negative effects of having a poorly balanced rifle? Probably a silly question, but I'm assuming every rifle I've ever shot has been balanced well.
Thanks for the help, guys.
So, what are some negative effects of having a poorly balanced rifle? Probably a silly question, but I'm assuming every rifle I've ever shot has been balanced well.
Thanks for the help, guys.
The only problem with the stock is you have to take out a bolt out of the pistol grip if you have to your trigger
tahunua001
Member
generally it's just a matter of control, many match rifles with heavy bull barrels are poorly balanced and front heavy and the major side effect is that it is a little more ungainly to control, the muzzle will want to follow the pull of gravity more so it makes it a little wonky to carry in a sling with muzzle up(not a huge problem especially in a carbine) and it will fatigue your non firing arm faster to have the greater amount of weight on the front but it also makes the rifle much more stable while shooting from a resting position(IE prone, sitting, kneeling or off sandbags) generally the problems with a gun the size of an SKS are minimal and easily rectified buy doing something similar to what was described in my last post.
The SKS is muzzle-heavy, no doubt. I keep a basic web sling on mine. I carry muzzle down, and don't completely remove my left arm when I shoulder the rifle. I just rotate the sling around to the back of my upper arm, just above the elbow. With the sling adjusted to the right length, it pulls tight when I shoulder the rifle and allows me to brace it with my left arm, supporting the forward end in a very stable firing hold. Someone here might actually be able to supply a picture or instruction diagram to illustrate.
Good luck, and I hope y'all find a solution that works for her.
- TS
Good luck, and I hope y'all find a solution that works for her.
- TS
Huh? Without reference to what stock you are referring to, this post is useless. What stock? If I have to WHAT my trigger? huh?!?!?!
The pistol grip stocks like the ATI have a pistol grip that is not molded to the stock, but slid into a recess and then secured with a set-screw or bolt. The grip has to be removed from the stock in order to access the release latch for the trigger housing. It's no big deal.
This must weigh 20-lbs. 
If you do any of these stocks, it's smart to buy the pre-assembled gas tube and hand guard. Removing the gas tube from your original wood hand guard is a PITA.
If you do any of these stocks, it's smart to buy the pre-assembled gas tube and hand guard. Removing the gas tube from your original wood hand guard is a PITA.
mljdeckard
Member
Post 34 is correct. I messed with getting the ferrule (the metal cap on the end of the wood piece of the gas tube) off and then on again, it doesn't cooperate. Mine still wiggles, and I mostly depend on the rotating take-down latch to hold it all together. I might still grab an assembled tube if I get around to it.
mljdeckard
Member
I think Mr. Johnny is talking about the Tapco and ATI stocks.
I just learned on my own SKS that if I want to remove the trigger guard assembly I have to unbolt the pistol grip from the stock.
The Tapco has a recess behind the trigger guard, looks like with a little bit of filing I might be able to get that trigger housing out without needing a socket wrench.
Anyone know why they do it that way? Am I risking breaking my stock and grip if I remove that bit of plastic?
mljdeckard
Member
I wouldn't do it. It's a 10mm socket with an extension. Look at it this way. It's an SKS. You don't have to keep it surgically clean anyway.
Simons,I know you had requirements, but I would buy this: Timbersmith SKS Stock
Here is a link to their video
If you're buying a wood stock to replace a wood stock (other than aesthetics), what is the gain?
mljdeckard,
You're right, of course. I'm just thinking of worst case scenarios and the weight of my bug-out bag. Perhaps I can get a 10MM screwdriver-handled socket and stow it in the stock along with the flat screwdriver for removing the scoped receiver cover and backup offset sights, and the allen wrench for removing the quad-rail handguard cover, and the other allen wrench for the scope rings, and the front sight adjustment key. Maybe the .30 cal bore snake will keep it all from rattling too much.
LOL
Last edited:
I have another question... Is there any reason that one of the Tapco Intrafuse stocks would affect accuracy?
I have an SKS on an ATI stock. It's got a bit of heft to it, but it's very sturdy and handles nicely.
I didn't mount it myself (bought it that way), but I hear they need a little bit of filing and work to fit it perfectly.
I didn't mount it myself (bought it that way), but I hear they need a little bit of filing and work to fit it perfectly.
The gain in replacing a cheap wood stock with a quality laminate one? Laminate is much more stable and far less prone to the elements than regular wood. A modern laminate stock is much more like a block of resin than a block of wood. Besides, that timbersmith stock looks about 1000% better than than the original or the plastic offerings, at least in my opinion.
Women in general do not like to shoot front heavy guns and like any extra weight to be in the rear instead. They also have longer necks than men and need a higher cheek rest. Also, look for a stock with a smaller grip.
Last edited:
I inadvertently brought up an old topic with a new topic. Perhaps I should have started a new thread. My NEW topic/question has to do with whether or not there is an affect on accuracy using the Intrafuse stock, good or bad.
Thanks, Joey! How much of a problem do you find it that the stock making the rifle "unbalanced?"
- Status
