dak0ta
Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 2,428
Hello,
I was wondering if you wanted to slug the bore of a milsurp rifle like a Soviet Mosin Nagant, could you perform a general test by using a 7.62x54R military surplus round with known bullet diameter and insert it bullet first into the muzzle? I know this test is used to measure the bore's wear and rifling at the muzzle assuming that it isn't counter-bored. But if the bullet doesn't sink too deeply into the barrel, does this indicate that the rifling is strong and that the bore diameter is smaller or the same as the bullet.
For example, a military surplus 7.62x54R round uses a .312 diameter bullet, and when you put the bullet into the muzzle, it doesn't penetrate very deeply. Does this mean that A) The rifling is strong at least at the muzzle and B) the bore diameter is .312 diameter or even smaller like .311? I would also make an educated guess that if it was of .308 diameter, the bullet wouldn't even go any measurable distance into the muzzle.
I saw some videos on YouTube showing people ramming a lead ball down and using calipers to measure it after it came out the other end. The process will give you the exact measurement of the diameter, but could a general test as the one I mentioned above suffice without having to buy all the materials to figure it out to 3 decimal places? If you figure it's in the .312 or .311 ballpark, you can just experiment with those bullet diameters and find one that works. If not, try .308. More guesswork through my process, but you would eventually narrow it down?
This is just a thought, please inform me!
I was wondering if you wanted to slug the bore of a milsurp rifle like a Soviet Mosin Nagant, could you perform a general test by using a 7.62x54R military surplus round with known bullet diameter and insert it bullet first into the muzzle? I know this test is used to measure the bore's wear and rifling at the muzzle assuming that it isn't counter-bored. But if the bullet doesn't sink too deeply into the barrel, does this indicate that the rifling is strong and that the bore diameter is smaller or the same as the bullet.
For example, a military surplus 7.62x54R round uses a .312 diameter bullet, and when you put the bullet into the muzzle, it doesn't penetrate very deeply. Does this mean that A) The rifling is strong at least at the muzzle and B) the bore diameter is .312 diameter or even smaller like .311? I would also make an educated guess that if it was of .308 diameter, the bullet wouldn't even go any measurable distance into the muzzle.
I saw some videos on YouTube showing people ramming a lead ball down and using calipers to measure it after it came out the other end. The process will give you the exact measurement of the diameter, but could a general test as the one I mentioned above suffice without having to buy all the materials to figure it out to 3 decimal places? If you figure it's in the .312 or .311 ballpark, you can just experiment with those bullet diameters and find one that works. If not, try .308. More guesswork through my process, but you would eventually narrow it down?
This is just a thought, please inform me!