So much for relying solely on headstamp,,,

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
3,424
Location
Kansas
So far, since I have no long range to shoot at, I've been content to reload rifle cartridges by relying on headstamp for cartridge consistency, not weighing individual cases or measuring volume.

Today, I had a few leftover Hornady 168 Match bullets and, while loading a larger group of another projectile in FC brass, decided first to just put the remaining Match bullets into a few Hornady cases I had sitting around. At the end, I weighed the completed cartridges, something I don't normally do (thought I might have missed filling a case but I hadn't..one dropped on the floor when I wasn't looking), and found, to my surprise, two groups that were clustered 20 grains apart in overall weight. Sorting them, I found that although all were Hornady headstamps, the heavier ones had a distinctly different font/look to the headstamp, obviously different lots or sources of brass, but the different looks sorted perfectly by weight. The 8 on the left and the 7 on the right in the photo below are the two groups.

Got pretty nervous about the FC brass, but in weighing randomly about 20 of the 100 brass I intended to load, they all fell within about 2 grains of each other.

Bottom line, it was a good lesson in lack of brass consistency. I had used the Hornady brass to do a previous ladder for Varget and the ultimate load I chose was precise at 100 yards (0.5" groups), but had a fairly large SD (>30 fps). I wonder now if the headstamps were throwing off the SD? I'm going to chrony these rounds and see if the two groups change position or velocity.

Just a good lesson. If I ever get into long range; at least weigh cases, maybe measure case volume!

Hornady Cases.jpg
 
Just a good lesson. If I ever get into long range; at least weigh cases, maybe measure case volume!

If you are really looking for consistency in rifle cartridges... just buy a single lot of quality brass and keep it separated from everything else. Relying on different lots of mass produced commercial brass, even virgin brass, can introduce variables that will likely show up on the long range target.

The one rifle I have that is likely capable of long range accuracy is a Savage 10 TAC. I've shot it out to 700yds before with reasonable success... but I had bullets miss by feet, not inches. I know that if I ever were to set down and strive for long range accuracy... I would have to start with 100 Lapua cases.
 
My factory once fired Hornady 6 Creed cases fall into two different weight ranges that nearly, if not, overlap. I just loaded them all up together anyway.
 
The one rifle I have that is likely capable of long range accuracy is a Savage 10 TAC. I've shot it out to 700yds before with reasonable success... but I had bullets miss by feet, not inches. I know that if I ever were to set down and strive for long range accuracy... I would have to start with 100 Lapua cases.
My guess is the ES/SD numbers are more to blame than the case specifically. Although better cases help, you still have to have a load to get small ES/SD numbers when reaching out there. Big ES/SD numbers can be had in the best brass.
 
My guess is the ES/SD numbers are more to blame than the case specifically. Although better cases help, you still have to have a load to get small ES/SD numbers when reaching out there. Big ES/SD numbers can be had in the best brass.

In my case, I was using a bullet I know to not be the most accurate (Nosler CC) with a powder the Savage doesn't particularly care for (IMR4895.) The cases were most likely generic RP brass that I bought in a 500cs lot, so they were (are) fairly consistent. You are correct... you can get any sort of anomaly with anything in the handloader chain, including 'quality' cases... but if you were to start from scratch, with your end goal being the most accurate cartridge you can produce, it makes sense to start with brass known for it's quality control.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top