gc70
Member
BSA1 said:Once we agree that folks with arbitrary mental illness as determined by a agency of the Government should be stripped of their 2A rights then we are only discussing how many Americans we want to disarm at a time and when to add more mental illnesses to the list to disarm more of them.
Your objection -other than a 'slippery slope' argument- is not clear.
Do you object to a particular aspect of the due process involved in the proposed rule? Or possibly an Administrative Law Judge making an adjudication rather than a judge in a civil or criminal court? Or are you arguing that nobody receiving mental disability benefits should be disarmed?
Please address any deficiencies in the specifics of the proposed rule rather than expressing generalities.