Ash
Member
Okay, I know folks have their opinions on arms - I certainly do - but I have come to the conclusion that the very best, most useable SKS made, is the least-loved Chinese spike. Heck, let it have a pinned barrel (seems to work fine on AK's and other arms). Trigger housing stamped? Works fine on the SVD Dragunov.
Why do I like it best? It is the most compact SKS you can get. I don't mean barrel length, but rather the overall thickness of the stock. Blade-mounted SKS rifles have beefier forends as compared to the spike and feel thicker or chunker. From the stock to the muzzle is thicker for the same reason. I have owned Yugo's, Russians, and Chinese SKS's, and the ones that are just handier are those spike carbines.
Granted, none of them are as handy as my Ruger GB, but they are cheaper and have a more useful round. Other can disagree, and certainly will. I do not mean it is more collectible, because it isn't. As a collector's rifle, I could see how such a rifle would be considered common and uninteresting. But as far as a shooter to carry, to keep and bear so to speak, it seems to be the most perfect.
Why do I like it best? It is the most compact SKS you can get. I don't mean barrel length, but rather the overall thickness of the stock. Blade-mounted SKS rifles have beefier forends as compared to the spike and feel thicker or chunker. From the stock to the muzzle is thicker for the same reason. I have owned Yugo's, Russians, and Chinese SKS's, and the ones that are just handier are those spike carbines.
Granted, none of them are as handy as my Ruger GB, but they are cheaper and have a more useful round. Other can disagree, and certainly will. I do not mean it is more collectible, because it isn't. As a collector's rifle, I could see how such a rifle would be considered common and uninteresting. But as far as a shooter to carry, to keep and bear so to speak, it seems to be the most perfect.