Stop running dogs on my property!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
My dog was shot with a common pump pellet gun, and the pellet did not penetrate further than the skin.
You know I'm not questioning that. I have no problem believing that a common pump pellet gun pumped one or two times (i.e. shooting around 300fps) might not penetrate further than the skin of a dog.

What I'm questioning is your allegation that the projectile did not penetrate further than the skin AND was going "~500 fps".
You can throw all the theoretical data out there you want.
Gel results may be "theoretical", but they're good enough for the largest and best funded law enforcement organization in the world. ;)
...empirical results rule.
Your "empirical results" mean nothing unless you can provide some reasonable evidence that the projectile in question was traveling "~500 fps".

For a bit more information, Robert Beeman, noted airgun expert, states that at around 500fps an airgun becomes capable of penetrating the human skull.

You could at least state what kind of gun it was, what kind of projectile was used and how many times it was pumped.
 
Last edited:
roost...this is where the stakeholder argument becomes relevant. I can tell you're versed in the North American Conservation Model so bear with me a second.

I live in a part of SC that had to be restocked in my granddads day to restore whitetails. I never knew him but one of my grandpa's friends was vigorously opposed to that. He was a farmer so he had obvious reasons for feeling that way.

We still have a bit of a subculture here that would just as soon deer weren't here. There are highway and depredation issues. There is NO way any deer would be given the status of someone's dog. Especially if the shooter were a guest on the property. Property rights are king here. Certainly wildlife is in the public trust but property rights are MUCH more important. In other words, the landowner doesn't own the wildlife but he's under no obligation to make accomodations for it.

People have had to pay up to 3 times the price of prize coonhounds ...and deerhounds...because they shot the wrong person's dog. I've heard people being relieved of as much as $40,000 because they shot the wrong dog.
 
Last edited:
I get your point.... and I agree that a dog is worth more than a deer, and that land owner rights are very very important.... but you still can't have dogs just running deer...

Perhaps I did speak a bit in haste though... it just dawned on me that these dogs might be trained to run deer and just happen to chase a deer, in a legal chase, into an area being hunted by someone else... in that case you would be pretty lame to shoot them... again, deal with the owners if you can... if it's your own land, you have pretty good grounds to demand that they keep their dogs out.... but shooting them will only cause problems, even if it is legal (they really can't keep the deer from running onto your land)... no sense pissing off a bunch of armed hunters with radios....
 
Around here it's legal to shoot dogs harassing wildlife and the moose are valued far more highly than a dog. The owners need to keep better control of them. But then again you never know how the owner is going to react, and it's better to put up with some nonsense from the hunds than get a hole through your chest. Common sense goes a long way. If this is right next to someone's occupied property and their dogs have strayed over the line it's probably not a good place to be hunting anyway. When I've run across off leash dogs doing this in the past and have a chance, I will snag the hund and bring it to the owner. Unless the PO'd moose has decided to chase *ME* LOL Then I dodge, duck, dip, dive, etc.
 
Last edited:
No pen, no leash, no collar- it's feral, whether "someone" is feeding it or not. If they are "deer dogs" used for running deer contact SCDNR and see what can be done.
 
Quote:
don't advocate killin livestock, but I'm not a "sociopath" either, nor do I think a stray animal or YOUR animal on MY property causing me harm in any way including harrassing wildlife is anything I will put up with. Fluffy just won't come home that evening, if he has a home.
You don't own the wildlife, the State of Texas does.

There is so much of this unwarranted killing of dogs (especially on leases, or around deer season) that is sickening. You and I both know that the prevailing attitude many places is: Shoot all dogs on sight!

Or: SSS Why do you have to "SSS" if you are comfortable with your defense?

I only ask every person to be responsible when making the determination to shoot a dog or not. I know full well there are feral/wild dogs that pose legitimate threats and should be taken out.

I am equally aware that there are huge numbers of people that will shoot ANY dog on site because "He was on MY property, ruined MY hunt, was chasing MY deer" etc....

For others....even less excuse is needed.

Come on folks, lets be intellectually honest about this issue and use your moral compass. At the very least "honestly" assess the situation before just pulling the trigger.

Surely, not ALL dogs need to be shot. It is a despicable practice that has become all too common place.


Thats my .00002 on it.

Flint.



Flintknapper, while I realize I "don't own the deer", look at it from a game management perspective. These dogs are feral and they harass and kill wildlife. They need to be eliminated. They aren't natural. I've come across deer kills that I suspect were dogs because a coyote kills to eat, so does a bobcat. My degree is in Wildlife and Fisheries Science so I tend to think of things in a management perspective anyway even though I was an "aquatic type" in college, because that's how I'm wired. I don't think in terms of the dog being "man's best friend". I don't anthropomorpize animals. Weed out the emotion and look at it logically is all I'm saying. I'm not so much trying to save the poor little deer from the big bad wolf, I'm killing an un-natural predator that is a real problem in the wild. The way one manages problems with feral animals if it's possible (feral hogs may not be) is to eliminate the problem. If hogs didn't have such a high natality rate, they wouldn't be causing YOU problems, either. You could simply eliminate them. Hey, hogs are smart animals, not warm, fuzzy, cuddly as dogs, but some folks keep 'em as pets. I'm not that affected with warm and fuzzy, myself, though I'll sit around and pet and nuzzle my cat like a friggin' 4 year old kid. I do understand the attachment to pets, just don't let it cloud my logic for proper management.

Yes, it's illegal to kill nuisance dogs......shhhhhhhhh. Those laws were pushed through last decade by animal rights idiots, and I use idiots because I won't type the words here that I really think about 'em. Feral dogs are no different than feral hogs, cause problems and need to be eliminated. Hogs don't run around kiliing deer, either, though they'll do a number on a quail nest.
 
Last edited:
Around here it's legal to shoot dogs harassing wildlife and the moose are valued far more highly than a dog. The owners need to keep better control of them. But then again you never know how the owner is going to react, and it's better to put up with some nonsense from the hunds than get a hole through your chest. Common sense goes a long way. If this is right next to someone's occupied property and their dogs have strayed over the line it's probably not a good place to be hunting anyway. When I've run across off leash dogs doing this in the past and have a chance, I will snag the hund and bring it to the owner. Unless the PO'd moose has decided to chase *ME* LOL Then I dodge, duck, dip, dive, etc.

I just wonder what that dog is going to do with a moose if he catches up with it? :rolleyes: LOL! He'd probably get kicked into the next county if not stomped to death.

I guess you guys have counties up there. Damn, I'd love to live in Alaska. I could probably get used to the winters, well, maybe. I already have skeeters.

I was going to get up and go deer hunting this morning, but the wife was sick last night and kept me awake hackin' and coughin'. I couldn't get up at 4:AM. But, see, if I was in Alaska, I could hunt all day long and it'd only be 4 hours. ROFL!
 
MCgunner the problem with your posts from my point of view isn't that you want to manage wildlife properly. It's that you sent the message to someone reading them that if you don't agree with the law, you don't follow it.

You might be a great guy. I don't know. I do know there are a lot of hunters who aren't and they would take your posts where you said you think the law is stupid so SSS as re-enforcement for their "policy" ... that might be more about wanting to shoot something ... anything... and less about management than yours. And lets face it, it's REAL easy to say he was chasing a deer or he was feral. The folks who have gotten in trouble with the law in SC have all TRIED those arguments.

There were a lot of "you're not talking about the topic of this thread" comments to me about my comments. That would be true if I were actually convinced arkel was looking for a legal way to deal with problem dogs. Since he omitted a key fact in this experience on the other board...knowing he was not going to have a sympathetic crowd for breaking the law, I have my doubts.

I've watched his posts since he showed up on the other board I'm talking about though and a number of us have concluded he's probably a teenager. Nothing wrong with teenagers until they are looking for re-enforcement for breaking the law and adults are giving it to them.

While I know everyone reading my posts aren't sociopaths, I'm pretty convinced someone has read this thread that may think about not shooting a dog because of it.

This will be my last comment on this thread. As I told Art and roost, I should NOT have taken this up with arkel here.
 
MCgunner the problem with your posts from my point of view isn't that you want to manage wildlife properly. It's that you sent the message to someone reading them that if you don't agree with the law, you don't follow it.

Guess what, if the gubment tells me to turn in my guns, do you think I'm going to obey it? :rolleyes: I suppose you see Thomas Jefferson and Sam Adams as outlaws. :rolleyes: Yeah, this law is STUPID. We should have the right to take out nuisance animals chasing game. If Texas law stipulated a defense against prosecution for animals in the act of chasing game, I'd be happy. If a human was out there chasing game, you'd lock him up under Texas law, a good stay in the state pen. Dogs, however, get a pass even though people like you want to give 'em human rights. Well, if they're human, send 'em to Huntsville and I won't have to shoot 'em. Maybe train 'em to be welders so they won't go delinquent or something. :rolleyes:

I'd argue politics with you, but this board doesn't allow it.
 
Feral dogs need to go.

Someone's pet that happens to get loose is not a feral dog. But its not the landowner's fault that someone else's dog got loose.
 
Deer hunting is a big deal here in W Illinois.
Lots of commercial hunting. Nobody around here is stupid enough or irresponsible enough to allow dogs to run loose.

It is not uncommon for "animal lovers" to dump unwanted dogs or pups on our back roads.

Dogs running wild are pretty likely to get culled.

Facts of life.
 
MCgunner wrote:


Flintknapper, while I realize I "don't own the deer", look at it from a game management perspective.
I prefer to look at it from ALL perspectives and not narrow it all down to "game management". The issue is broader than that.

These dogs are feral and they harass and kill wildlife. They need to be eliminated. They aren't natural.
I would submit that SOME dogs are feral and it is true...some...harass (perhaps kill) wildlife. However, it is neither fair...nor accurate to suggest that ALL dogs are doing so.

This where the "shoot all dogs" mentality is spawned. Is it too much to ask...for hunters/landowners/stewards to first "assess" the situation to best of their ability?

I've come across deer kills that I suspect were dogs because a coyote kills to eat, so does a bobcat.
I doubt you have come any significant number and even if you have...it would be nearly impossible to distinguish a "Coyote" kill from a "Feral dog" kill. If you happened upon a fresh kill, then it is entirely possible that you simply disturbed the "consumption" that was about to take place.

Now, if you have empirical evidence (actually saw it take place, noted larger tracks than a coyote could make, something....) then I'm with you, but not simply "suspected".

My degree is in Wildlife and Fisheries Science so I tend to think of things in a management perspective anyway even though I was an "aquatic type" in college, because that's how I'm wired.
That is your privilege of course, but there is so much more to life. ;) :D


I don't think in terms of the dog being "man's best friend". I don't anthropomorpize animals.
Nor do I. I have lived in the country nearly all of my life (55 yrs). I am keenly aware of the ecology (balance of things) and being a good steward of ALL things concerning the land, wildlife and resources.

I have livestock....and have had to shoot a few dogs in the past that were actively attacking them. I am not timid about "what needs to done", but I am discerning.


Weed out the emotion and look at it logically is all I'm saying. I'm not so much trying to save the poor little deer from the big bad wolf, I'm killing an un-natural predator that is a real problem in the wild.
In cases where feral dogs have "packed up" or if a single dog is repeatedly sighted harassing, chasing, etc, I am on board with you.....they can be a problem. Fortunately, (from my experience) this is a rare problem. The harassment, destruction of livestock is a much greater problem, but not the subject here.


The way one manages problems with feral animals if it's possible (feral hogs may not be) is to eliminate the problem. If hogs didn't have such a high natality rate, they wouldn't be causing YOU problems, either. You could simply eliminate them. Hey, hogs are smart animals, not warm, fuzzy, cuddly as dogs, but some folks keep 'em as pets.

I appreciate the attempt to equate my feral hog problem with that of an occasional stray/feral/pet dog, but honestly...its two different things. Feral hog populations (in Texas) are approaching that of the total deer population (4 million). Obviously.. a problem on a "whole nother scale" and one that is unlikely to involve one's pet.

I'm not that affected with warm and fuzzy, myself, though I'll sit around and pet and nuzzle my cat like a friggin' 4 year old kid. I do understand the attachment to pets, just don't let it cloud my logic for proper management.
So...which would be your decision if a "collared, healthy" dog were to come across your property during deer season, with it's nose to the ground?

Do you give the animal "a pass" assuming it to be someones property/pet....or does the urge to "manage" dictate the outcome?

Yes, it's illegal to kill nuisance dogs......shhhhhhhhh.
Yes it is, and there are substantial fines associated with it. But more importantly, we should not take a caviler attitude toward laws we don't agree with. Work to get them changed or amended. There is a need...no question about it.


Those laws were pushed through last decade by animal rights idiots, and I use idiots because I won't type the words here that I really think about 'em.
More likely in response to the wholesale slaughter of any uncollared or free roaming dog. The laws have different effects depending upon where you live and how many dogs are present. It is a rare problem for me (rural property)...but I can see it being a huge problem for those in urban areas.

I only ask that each person carefully consider the true status of the animal before thinking about killing it.

I want to confess a "jaundiced" outlook on this subject, one formed from having lost my Lab to some hunters from Dallas. Not a "feral" dog, collared (fluorescent orange), never chased a deer his life. But....cut the corner of a neighboring property to go visit another neighbors dog (a daily occurrence and vise versa).

There are no leash laws where I live and neighbors dogs routinely visit here as well. Everyone knows this...and we generally have no problems.

Even during deer season....there is little to worry about. One of the "hunters" from Dallas confessed to the shooting (he had the same NO DOGS attitude) as some here have adopted. Even though the dog was not doing anything wrong.

My neighbor was horrified and as upset as I was about it. He had just leased the property to the three (men?) that year and had in no way given permission to shoot anything but deer.

Now, I am sure someone is itching to write "If you had kept your dog penned it wouldn't have happened". Yes, but that is not the rural custom where I live and the practice of "discernment/assessment" would have prevented this too.

IMO, (not based upon this incident) there are far too many people eager to pull the trigger on dogs of unknown status.... than there are legitimate shootings.

I can't tell you the number of people (some I would never suspect) that shoot and brag about having killed a dog that came across their property/lease. When asked about it....you get the usual response/defense: Was running deer (or presumed to be), was on MY property (no other reason needed), ruined my hunt (retaliation), could be rabid (oh please....), my Dad always shot them (okay.......?) etc.

Please "assess"! And be honest with yourself about why you feel animal should be dispatched. Don't just immediately fall into the "its for management" camp or any other of the plethora of excuses people come up with.
 
What I'm questioning is your allegation that the projectile did not penetrate further than the skin AND was going "~500 fps".

John, I will finish this argument by saying that my dog was shot with a pellet gun going ~500fps ("~" means approximately btw), and very minimal damage was observed. I saw that the pellet was lodged just under the skin. If this doesn't coincide with what your experts and gelatin say, well so be it. Gelatin is just not the same, its like shooting an orange to see how far a pellet will go in an apple, if you know what I'm saying. My dog learned not to go onto the neighbors property, and yet I was spared any agony over the death of a good dog.

Gel results may be "theoretical", but they're good enough for the largest and best funded law enforcement organization in the world.

This is because they need a standardized medium to compare various projectiles. If they really wanted to know penetration depth into a body, they would probably get some pigs as the original researchers did. Unfortunately this medium is not suitable to COMPARE projectiles due to its heterogeneity e.g. a 9 mm may miss a bone and penetrate further than a 45 acp that hits a bone and penetrates less, therefore, invalidating the experiment due to gross systematic errors.

Thanks for the great discussion John! I learned a lot from some of the post you made, and I think the OP will have gained a good "for" or "against" the use of a pellet gun to keep dogs off his land.
 
The problem of feral dog packs is fresh on my mind since I've had the problem here in the last few years. I've shot a couple of dogs and two coyotes on my place in the last 21 years, not a big problem down there and they were obviously not someones mutt or that someone should be arrested for animal cruelty, not me, for not properly feeding or taking the thing to the vet for mange. BUT, I don't spare the ammunition if I see a problem mutt down there, more'n a good chance it's feral since there ain't a whole lot of housing close by. One of those coyotes was jet black and long haired. I suspect he was crossed up with domestic dog, actually. His companion was pure coyote. He looked coyote in the face and build, but in no other way. I'd have gotten a pic of him, but I shot him at 350 yards across the fence on the big ranch next to me. I hung the other one up on the fence so the rancher would know I tagged it. They appreciate that sort of thing. I like to be a good neighbor. :D

As for stupid laws, wait 'til gun control becomes priority over health care in DC, or they tied it in to health care, which is being tried. You're going to see a whole lot of disobedience. Personally, I lost all mine in a burglary when running from Ike. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. No, the animal cruelty laws are STUPID the way they're written. That's MHO. People care more about dogs than kids now days. That's my wife, the former CPS case worker's line.

Yes, I do become outlaw sometimes, very few times, but I have when need be. Laws are written by men, often flawed men, not God. I am a free man.....so far....under the constitution. I don't have to worry about the polit bureau or the stazi, yet. It's comin', though. Are you going to be obedient? Not me.

Ah, but I'm getting political and said I wouldn't do that.
 
Well, I'd have to say, it seems as though all of the 'pro's and con's' of shooting a dog while hunting has been covered here....
 
By Texas law, if they threaten livestock, even if you don't catch 'em IN the act, you are in your rights to kill 'em. Nuf said.

I am in Texas, and have been in court over shooting a dog that was molesting my livestock, and I have to inform you sir that you are wrong. You are within your legal rights to shoot a dog in the act of molesting your livestock, or other provable property damage. It gets a little more dicey if you shoot them fleeing from such activity, but can probably get by. You can not shoot them for just being on your land.
 
Flintknapper, while I realize I "don't own the deer", look at it from a game management perspective. These dogs are feral and they harass and kill wildlife. They need to be eliminated. They aren't natural. I've come across deer kills that I suspect were dogs because a coyote kills to eat, so does a bobcat.

Aren't natural? What does that mean? There are very few natural predators for deer sized game left in most places that deer roam, thus the gross overpopulation of many areas. If you are worried about unnatural deer deaths I think you have way more to worry about from cars, fences, and other man made issues. I'm quite certain that many more deer meet an unnatural death on highways and hung in fences than from dogs. I'm not saying that killing a dog is wrong in every circumstance, I have had to kill a few myself, but killing most on the assumption that they are strays that you seem to be advocating is silly, almost as silly as your justifications.
 
Not a consideration in Texas where running deer with dogs is illegal.

Again, your understanding of Texas law is incomplete. In Texas, with the exception of a few East Texas counties, it is legal to track wounded deer with up to two unleashed dogs. I happen to run a tracking dog service, and I always make it a point that anyone who calls me contact their neighbors and inform them that we will be tracking a deer with dogs. The reason I do this is because a man I know in South Texas lost a very good dog to a hunter who shot the dog for doing his job. The hunters camp had been informed of the possibility of a tracking dog being on the place, but somehow he had not gotten the message, so he saw the dog trying to stop a wounded deer, and shot and killed a $5000 dog. Telling you now, if you SSS one of my dogs...I'm going to be hot.
 
Aren't natural? What does that mean? There are very few natural predators for deer sized game left in most places that deer roam, thus the gross overpopulation of many areas. If you are worried about unnatural deer deaths I think you have way more to worry about from cars, fences, and other man made issues.

From a game management perspective, you cannot manage deer/car deaths. You can manage predator populations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top