Sunday Hunting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:
I don't hunt (or fish) on Sundays for religious reasons, but I think having a law against it is about the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

Agreed. My family and I are all very active in our home congregation. I have no issue hunting on Sunday, nor do I see any New Testament teaching that would shun it. That said, I do not want my family, my hunting-partner son, even more importantly The Lord, seeing me place hunting ahead of worshiping on the first day of the week. We have a faithful congregation that is a 25 mile drive from our lease, so that is where we attend Sunday mornings when at the lease. If we have a group hunting, then I hold services at camp. If we get a deer that morning, it must be field dressed and hanging by 9:30 am, so we plan leaving the blind accordingly.

None of these choices are the prerogative of government, at any level, to regulate. I trust neither their motives, their desire to control, nor their interpretation of my faith.
 
Hunting game on a Sunday is illegal here because Sunday was the only day off the common person had. So to prevent them hunting would preserve more game for the landowners who of course could hunt when they want. I wonder if your laws are simply modelled on that.
 
Maine has a Sunday hunting ban.

Apparently, there have been numerous attempts to change the law, but each time it has been met with a chorus of people who, "want just one a week to enjoy the woods without having to worry about being shot." Alternatively, the argument is, "Give the animals a break for one day a week."

The trouble with the above arguments is that Maine's hunting seasons are very short. Excepting furbearer hunting and trapping which is something a relative few people still do, hunting season only lasts October - December, and firearms deer season is only the month of November. The people and animals have woods free of hunters for 3/4 of the year.
 
I'll echo what others have said. I go to church on Sunday mornings and spend the afternoons with my family. What someone else does has zero effect on me. The bans are simply a holdover of the blue laws.

About the separation of church and state. There isn't one. Period. Has one been "found" by the courts? Sure. But it isn't actually there. All the Constitution says is that Congress cannot establish any religion as the "official" religion. It does NOT say that any religious expression is forbidden by anyone in government or on government land. For example, manger scenes at Christmas. Having one at the local courthouse is fine. What would not be fine (per the Constitution, not the idiot lawyers that have screwed the pooch for so long) is allowing a manger but denying the star of David or an expression of other religion if asked to display.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

NB: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

Congress can't make an official state religion, nor can they impede you from practicing your chosen religion. If you have one. Just like a Baptist has no right to force his belief on a Methodist, an Atheist has no right to force his belief (or lack) on someone who does believe. This has been the most common outcome, an interpretation favoring freedom FROM religion, not OF religion.
 
i think the law is pretty stupid and probly just a tactic by some bunny huger in office to keep bambi safe.. i got to church every sunday and if i have time when its over i go hunting
 
Congress can't make an official state religion, nor can they impede you from practicing your chosen religion. If you have one. Just like a Baptist has no right to force his belief on a Methodist, an Atheist has no right to force his belief (or lack) on someone who does believe. This has been the most common outcome, an interpretation favoring freedom FROM religion, not OF religion.

If the government is binding THEIR interpretation of scripture, IE -- Sunday is a day of rest, then they are in fact establishing a religion. They are also wrong doctrinally, since the "sabbath" is SATURDAY under the old Law, a law Christians are no longer bound by (see the entire book of Galatians). The New Testament church met on the first day of the week, SUNDAY, with no prohibitions for work, hunting, or other activity. Only nine of the 10 commandments are repeated in the NEW Testament. Keeping the sabbath is not one of them, meaning it is relegated to the Law of Moses.

To my Jewish friends I say this: I am perfectly accepting and respectful of your religious objections toward helping me fill feeders on Saturday.

I am likewise respectful of my Christian friends that have a similar objection for Sunday activity.

I am NOT respectful of any governmental attempt to bind me to either position. Such proclamations from on high are in response to the religious interpretations of lobbying groups that I very likely disagree with, and such errant views IMO should never be bound on the public, especially on those that do not hold those same views. Such impositions were the very foundation of our separation from a tyrant king.

This is why the government is a poor place to allow the imposition of faith. They and those that lobby them are not theologians that I trust to apply ANY doctrine accurately, and even if they were, doing so would clearly violate the first amendment. I'll take care of the application of religious doctrine within the walls of my own home, thank you very much.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top