Swat Team killing of Sal Culosi in Fairfax, Va.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blackfork

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
1,219
Location
East Texas
A Killing Without Cause
And a slap on the wrist for the Fairfax police

Thursday, November 30, 2006; Page A22

FAIRFAX COUNTY police officer Deval V. Bullock is a good cop who made one disastrous mistake: Bumped by his own car door, he accidentally fired his weapon and killed an unarmed, nonviolent, non-threatening suspect during a routine arrest in January. The shooting of Salvatore J. Culosi, an optometrist under investigation for being a sports bookmaker, was unintentional. But it was also negligent; under the circumstances, Mr. Bullock should not have had his finger on the trigger, nor even aimed his weapon at Mr. Culosi. Now the Fairfax police department is recommending a slap on the wrist for Mr. Bullock -- three weeks without pay and his removal from the police SWAT team. The punishment is lenient, to say the least, but even so it is too much for the police union.

For months before this egregious shooting, an undercover police detective had been placing bets with Mr. Culosi, who had no criminal record; had never owned a firearm; and presented no threat of violence, flight or resisting arrest. It is still unclear, 10 months after the fact, why despite that profile police decided to arrest Mr. Culosi with a SWAT team, which is trained and equipped for use in dangerous situations. After Mr. Culosi's death, the police department said it would conduct a review of policies and procedures involving the use of such teams. But if there was such a review, its results have not been made public. One wonders if the SWAT team in Fairfax, lacking frequent opportunities to respond to situations involving imminent danger and threats, is deployed simply to give its officers something to do. If so, that's bad policy and bad policing.



The SWAT team guy got three weeks suspension, and the police union is unhappy about THAT.
There's more, at the Washington Post or www.theagitator.com.
 
People are just going to stop calling the police, out of fear they'll be tasered or ND'ed or just shot when they arrive.
 
One wonders if the SWAT team in Fairfax, lacking frequent opportunities to respond to situations involving imminent danger and threats, is deployed simply to give its officers something to do.
BINGO!! If I pointed a gun at someone because 1) I suspected he was a bookie, 2) I wanted to make a citizen's arrest, and 3) it went off, killing him, how many years do you think I'd get? They'd put me under the jail. And this guy gets a slap on the wrist. :fire: Why? Is a badge a license to kill, like James Bond?
 
Last edited:
Unfortunate accident. Not sure if a blanket condemnation of SWAT is in order. Does seem as though that by the time you make SWAT you would have learned to at least keep your finger off the trigger.
 
not sure it's so much a blanket condemnation of SWAT, per se, as it is for their policies combined with a seemingly preferential treatment of 'accidents' in the line of duty.
 
It's sad when vigilante justice seems to be the only way to get justice anymore. The Atlanta shooting is going to go the same way.
 
Members of occupying armies tend not to see what the big fuss is when they murder civilians. True in WWII, true in Vietnam, true in South America, true in Iraq and true in the US.
 
Members of occupying armies tend not to see what the big fuss is when they murder civilians. True in WWII, true in Vietnam, true in South America, true in Iraq and true in the US.
Well said. Increasingly, tactical folks in law enforcement are seeing themselves as an occupying army, instead of our employees. The Founders never envisioned an occupying army of militarized agents of government patrolling every corner of our country so as to enforce the will of government on an unwilling population.
 
Well said. Increasingly, tactical folks in law enforcement are seeing themselves as an occupying army, instead of our employees.

That sentiment has only become more pronounced over the last 5 years. I am acquainted with police officers who have likened their job to that of a soldier. In fact, during discussions about the war in Iraq and service to country in general, those officers have stated that they feel that they are "doing their part on the home front."

Troubling.
 
When I see old movies and video of cops in uniform with issue revolvers and maybe a pump shotgun, then see the "new" cops running around in camo, battle rattle and helmet, covered with flashbangs, tasers, and an AR, seemingly at the least provocation, I do have to wonder what "the police" have become.
 
When I see old movies and video of cops in uniform with issue revolvers and maybe a pump shotgun, then see the "new" cops running around in camo, battle rattle and helmet, covered with flashbangs, tasers, and an AR, seemingly at the least provocation, I do have to wonder what "the police" have become.
The reason for the transformation probably, when you get down to it, has something to do with the need to keep us in line when they submerge US Sovereignty into a North American Union of Mexico, Canada and the US. If we are shaking in our boots at the scary SWAT teams floating around, we are less likely to get uppity about it.
 
Look out, he's betting against the Pats! *bang-bang-bang!*

Well, somebody that crazy's bound to be dangerous!

~GnSx
 
Since when are Labor Disputes over the proper reprimand for violation of the rules anywhere on topic?

Closed...There are some members who really had better start thinking about what the rules are before they start threads. Is that understood?

Jeff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top