twoblink
Member
Well,
I went to Thailand (Phuket Island) and got back last week. It was beautiful.. I took my gf to the range also... (Her first time shooting) She only got 1 on paper, but it's the fun that counts...
That said, Thailand has very loose control on guns, but very tight control on ammo. They have an "annual brass count", that means, if your range has registered 1000 rounds of 9mm, then, at the end of the year, there'd better be 1000 9mm casings, or else someone is going to jail..
On the surface, the "guns aren't dangerous if nobody has bullets" sounds logical, and this is now the new PRK argument (Mike Hernandez and the LA City Counsel should be sent somewhere with fire and brimstone, but I digress) That ammo control is effective..
Actually.. It's not.. Here's why.
Notice, it's an annual ammo count. The tax on it is very high ($1.50US PER BULLET!!) So they figure nobody can really afford to buy large quantities..
Well, I take some ammo, I shoot and kill people, I reload it, ... TA DA!! At the end of the year, I'm still ok, as long as I keep the brass!
So I don't know what kind of Bureaucratic Rat thought this up, but it's so stupid it's incredible..
I don't know which is worse though, the law it self, or the fact that the PRK is using it as a model..
Oh, before the compliants roll in, it's not really the PRK, it's really just LA City Proper, but I'm sure, if it was implimented, the People's Republik of San Fran or People's Republik of Oakland will follow..
I have confidence in Oakland, with sky high crime rates and Ebonics, nothing from the Oak town surprises me anymore..
:banghead:
I went to Thailand (Phuket Island) and got back last week. It was beautiful.. I took my gf to the range also... (Her first time shooting) She only got 1 on paper, but it's the fun that counts...
That said, Thailand has very loose control on guns, but very tight control on ammo. They have an "annual brass count", that means, if your range has registered 1000 rounds of 9mm, then, at the end of the year, there'd better be 1000 9mm casings, or else someone is going to jail..
On the surface, the "guns aren't dangerous if nobody has bullets" sounds logical, and this is now the new PRK argument (Mike Hernandez and the LA City Counsel should be sent somewhere with fire and brimstone, but I digress) That ammo control is effective..
Actually.. It's not.. Here's why.
Notice, it's an annual ammo count. The tax on it is very high ($1.50US PER BULLET!!) So they figure nobody can really afford to buy large quantities..
Well, I take some ammo, I shoot and kill people, I reload it, ... TA DA!! At the end of the year, I'm still ok, as long as I keep the brass!
So I don't know what kind of Bureaucratic Rat thought this up, but it's so stupid it's incredible..
I don't know which is worse though, the law it self, or the fact that the PRK is using it as a model..
Oh, before the compliants roll in, it's not really the PRK, it's really just LA City Proper, but I'm sure, if it was implimented, the People's Republik of San Fran or People's Republik of Oakland will follow..
I have confidence in Oakland, with sky high crime rates and Ebonics, nothing from the Oak town surprises me anymore..
:banghead: