The Best Shot in Iraq

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZMP_CTR

Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
252
sniper.jpg

US Sniper Takes Out Insurgent at 1,250 Meters

Toby Harnden in Ramadi
The Telegraph (UK)

Gazing through the telescopic sight of his M24 rifle, Staff Sgt Jim Gilliland, leader of Shadow sniper team, fixed his eye on the Iraqi insurgent who had just killed an American soldier.

His quarry stood nonchalantly in the fourth-floor bay window of a hospital in battle-torn Ramadi, still clasping a long-barreled Kalashnikov. Instinctively allowing for wind speed and bullet drop, Shadow's commander aimed 12 feet high.

A single shot hit the Iraqi in the chest and killed him instantly. It had been fired from a range of 1,250 meters, well beyond the capacity of the powerful Leupold sight, accurate to 1,000 meters.

"I believe it is the longest confirmed kill in Iraq with a 7.62mm rifle," said Staff Sgt Gilliland, 28, who hunted squirrels in Double Springs, Alabama from the age of five before progressing to deer - and then people.

"He was visible only from the waist up. It was a one in a million shot. I could probably shoot a whole box of ammunition and never hit him again."

Later that day, Staff Sgt Gilliland found out that the dead soldier was Staff Sgt Jason Benford, 30, a good friend.

The insurgent was one of between 55 and 65 he estimates that he has shot dead in less than five months, putting him within striking distance of sniper legends such as Carlos Hathcock, who recorded 93 confirmed kills in Vietnam. One of his men, Specialist Aaron Arnold, 22, of Medway, Ohio, has chalked up a similar tally.

"It was elating, but only afterwards," said Staff Sgt Gilliland, recalling the September 27 shot. "At the time, there was no high-fiving. You've got troops under fire, taking casualties and you're not thinking about anything other than finding a target and putting it down. Every shot is for the betterment of our cause."

All told, the 10-strong Shadow sniper team, attached to Task Force 2/69, has killed just under 200 in the same period and emerged as the US Army's secret weapon in Ramadi against the threat of the hidden Improvised Explosive Device (IED) or roadside bomb - the insurgency's deadliest tactic.

Above the spot from which Staff Sgt Gilliland took his record shot, in a room at the top of a bombed-out observation post which is code-named Hotel and known jokingly to soldiers as the Ramadi Inn, are daubed "Kill Them All" and "Kill Like you Mean it".

On another wall are scrawled the words of Senator John McCain: "America is great not because of what she has done for herself but because of what she has done for others."

The juxtaposition of macho slogans and noble political rhetoric encapsulates the dirty, dangerous and often callous job the sniper has to carry out as an integral part of a campaign ultimately being waged to help the Iraqi people.

With masterful understatement, Lt Col Robert Roggeman, the Task Force 2/69 commander, conceded: "The romantic in me is disappointed with the reception we've received in Ramadi," a town of 400,000 on the banks of the Euphrates where graffiti boasts, with more than a degree of accuracy: "This is the graveyard of the Americans".

"We're the outsiders, the infidels," he said. "Every time somebody goes out that main gate he might not come back. It's still a running gun battle."

Highly effective though they are, he worries about the burden his snipers have to bear. "It's a very God-like role. They have the power of life and death that, if not held in check, can run out of control. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

"Every shot has to be measured against the Rules of Engagement [ROE], positive identification and proportionality."

Staff Sgt Gilliland explains that his Shadow team operates at the "borderlines" of the ROE, making snap judgments about whether a figure in the crosshairs is an insurgent or not.

"Hunters give their animals respect," he said, spitting out a mouthful of chewing tobacco. "If you have no respect for what you do you're not going to be very good or you're going to make a mistake. We try to give the benefit of the doubt.

"You've got to live with it. It's on your conscience. It's something you've got to carry away with you. And if you shoot somebody just walking down the street, then that's probably going to haunt you."

Although killing with a single shot carries an enormous cachet within the sniper world, their most successful engagements have involved the shooting a up to 10 members of a single IED team.

"The one-shot-one-kill thing is one of beauty but killing all the bad dudes is even more attractive," said Staff Sgt Gilliland, whose motto is "Move fast, shoot straight and leave the rest to the counselors in 10 years" and signs off his e-mails with "silent souls make.308 holes".

Whether Shadow team's work will ultimately make a difference in Iraq is open to question. No matter how many insurgents they shoot, there seems no shortage of recruits to plant bombs.

Col John Gronski, the overall United States commander in Ramadi, said there could not be a military solution. "You could spend years putting snipers out and killing IED emplacers and at the political level it would make no difference."

As they prepare to leave Iraq, however, Staff Sgt Gilliland and his men hope that they have bought a little more time for the country's politicians to fix peace and stability in their sights.
 
Proving once again I would rather be lucky than good. But he appears to be both, as well as experienced.

1250 Meters = .77 miles. Target size of an upper torso? About 30'' X 18''. Outstanding for an M24 and .308. Under combat conditions? Outstanding for the soldier.

Gee- I wonder why he is not wearing digitals? Dosen't he know they look way cooler?
 
about 1350 yards:what:
outside of the distance, the bullets drop to subsonic nearly 500 yards earlier and the relatively small chance that even a COM hit with a 174gr 308 at probably about 750fps would kill, seems like luck isn't quite the word for it.
 
Fella's;

Now, any anti-American who can access the net has his picture, his name, and his home town. This is not a good thing.

900F
 
My new hero! I wonder how long before Katie Couric and Brian Williams run this story. :rolleyes:
 
Eagle103 said:
...I wonder how long before Katie Couric and Brian Williams run this story.

Wouldn't matter, with ratings as low as theirs no one know it aired....
 
So what? He shot an insurgent from far away. big deal.

I can shoot 2 inch groups at 5,000 meters all day long with a fully automatic FAL Para.......with one hand.........standing on one leg........balancing on a sharp nail.

:neener::D
 
Fella's;

Now, any anti-American who can access the net has his picture, his name, and his home town. This is not a good thing.

900F
__________________
Trying to eat chili without drinking beer is like trying to breathe without using oxygen.

I believe this story was run by military.com. I could be wrong.
 
"I believe it is the longest confirmed kill in Iraq with a 7.62mm rifle," said Staff Sgt Gilliland

the 7.62 part being key, there are a few cases of kills at 2000+meters with the barrett 50.

the tecnicalities and record don't really matter the shot is still impressive, and like all the troops over there the guy is a genuine hero.
 
Why is the US flag patch on his vest reversed?
It's made to go on the right shoulder. It is that way because a flag would stream out behind you if you are moving forward.
 
I know that the stars are always flown/shown forward. I'm just wondering why he didn't use a correctly oriented (stars on left) patch instead of that one.

BTW, ZMP_CTR, do you actually work for that ARTCC?
 
Fly320s said:
I know that the stars are always flown/shown forward. I'm just wondering why he didn't use a correctly oriented (stars on left) patch instead of that one.

strambo is correct. Our patches are meant to be worn on the right shoulder, which places the stars forward. I don't think the military even makes stars-on-the-left flag patches. I've never seen one at the PX. If the military does have such an item, I doubt it's available at the PX in Ramadi.
 
Rifleman. That's all.

Good shootin', man. The rest is all just details.

As long as there is war we will need riflemen to engage the enemy one-on-one. Tanks cannot do this. A-bombs (or any other kind) cannot do this. Generals and negotiators and politicians cannot do this.

So we had better always have good shots among us. Looks like we're doing OK so far in that department.

God bless our troops.
 
Now, any anti-American who can access the net has his picture, his name, and his home town. This is not a good thing.

Considering this was published over a year ago by the UK's Telegraph, the Washington Times, and about 3 dozen blogs in the last year and a half, I don't think putting it on THR is going to make much of a difference.

That said, it's been discussed here already:
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=174375
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=179481
 
I think he originally posed for the photo facing the other way, but to make the photo fit the layout better someone did a mirror reverse
 
I think he originally posed for the photo facing the other way, but to make the photo fit the layout better someone did a mirror reverse

That would mean he was posing a left handed rifle since you can clearly see the forward assist. Also, a left-handed ACOG and the extremely rare left-handed PEQ-2.
 
Fella's;

The point isn't when it was published, or even who published it. It's that it was published at all. Why take the chance? Or do you believe that nothing bad could happen to him or his family? Now, how is it you spell naive?

900F
 
Peoples names and home towns, including soldiers, are published in news papers and television almost every single day. This is nothing new.

If he didn't want it out there he didn't have to post for the picture and story. There is nothing else to it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top