The original proponent in teaching of the tactical reload concept?

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is a difference between concept and procedure. I came across this in the December 2013 issue of The Blue Press “The Tactical Reload: Why, When & How The Creator OF The Tactical Reload Sets the Record Straight By Chuck Taylor”.
 
I think part of that concept is being able to better choose WHEN you get to reload, as well...not just whether or not you'll be engaging the bad guys with a less-than-full magazine.

Seems to me that, given the choice, I'd rather intentionally make as many of my reloads under conditions of my own choosing, where I've got a break and can reload without someone actually shooting back at me. This reduces the odds that I'll have to reload under the duress of direct exchange of fire with the BG.
I'm quite new to all tactical/practical shooting. That said, this point seems to make sense tactically and practically.

Someone earlier (sorry I forgot his name) mentioned that the logic behind these tactical reloads is founded upon the premise that you had a relatively small number of shots with older firearms... Having 8 rounds in your .45 is a whole different thing than have 17 or more.

Even so, I would think that the logic holds. If there is a lull in the activity where it is safe to reload, it would seem you'd want to be 'as full as possible' as quickly as possible. The time taken to speed reload - even as fast as some people can do it - is still time spent reloading while some number of BGs are able to bring fire against you. Plus, it's not like I'm losing the rounds that are in the partially empty mag. I'll just be using those later in the fight if, God help me, it's needed.
 
The tactical reload

The tactical reload and the reload with retention are very controversial to some people and I'm not sure why. It is the topic of frequent conversation on various Internet forums devoted to the defensive application of firearms.

I think some people don't understand it's intended application. I also think that some people have very fixed ideas about what form confrontation will take. I think being rigid in predicting the dynamics of confrontation is counter-productive. While it is statistically likely that the problem may be solved with one magazine or cylinder full of ammunition, it is hazardous to presume that all situations will be resolved so quickly. Clint Smith of Thunder Ranch has a saying something like: "Your gunfight will not be what you expect it to be. It will be something else".

Private citizens with a CCW permit acting in self defense and cops working patrol often have confrontational situations that are somewhat similar in that they are sudden & unexpected. Members of a police SWAT team or soldiers engaged in military operations in urban terrain usually face different dynamics of confrontation.

Confrontations that private citizens or LEOs on patrol encounter are often sudden, close, dark and fast. If there is an exchange of fire, both sides are probably moving. After the initial volley, the survivors retreat to cover or run away. The trained survivors will reload their weapons. They may just reload or they may perform a tactical reload or reload with retention, depending upon the circumstances, their training and their evaluation of the threat.

Often times the incident ends right there and one cylinder full or magazine full was enough. But it may not be.

A tactical reload or reload with retention allows you continue on with a fully loaded weapon. With an auto pistol, it allows you to retain unexpended ammo in that magazine for future use if required. With a revolver it allows you to face continued danger with a fully charged cylinder without tossing live rounds on the ground where they will be lost & unavailable if needed.

A tac reload is a secondary technique appropriate to a limited & specific set of circumstances that are somewhat uncommon but still quite possible.

I have big hands & long fingers. I can do a tac load with thick double column magazines. Still, if my hands are cold, if I'm wearing gloves, or I'm running an AR-15, I find the reload with retention to work the best for me.

Shooters with smaller hands & thick magazine may find the reload with retention to be their preferred technique.

In an IDPA or IPSC match, we can usually look at a pre-published course of fire and evaluate it and figure out where best to do reloads. Real life doesn't have course descriptions and you don't know when it's over or how many rounds may be required . . .

In a military situation, if you're dropping your rifle mags all over without retaining them, you may soon run out without possibility of timely resupply. I believe that was an issue with the Rangers in Somalia involved in the book (and movie) "Black Hawk Down".

So in summary, a tactical reload or reload with retention is a secondary technique applicable in certain specific situations.
 
This is how we do it...

Here's a clip of my protege Rick Simes shot at the SGN here on my range. Rick shot the match STONE COLD, had not shot a match in over a year and had no time to train for the event.

Note his Tactical Reload on the move under match pressure...perfect score, shot clean and smooth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq15SCffwEY&feature=youtu.be

Enjoy!
 
Last edited:
Your video link is screwed up. You copied and pasted it and it came through with the "..." as part of the link.
 
Easy! Type [noparse][/noparse].

You don't put the whole address in there, just the part that comes after the "v=".

Usually something like "Hox1CEShTnQ"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top