Sure, but will it survive being mounted on my Barrett?
With that said, it does seem impressive compared to the Beast, brighter and cheaper, plus it recharges!
DigMe, yes, the Scorpion is a little brighter than the Surefire, but not by much and certainly not by 6495 candlepower (1300 times), which according to the math, it would be. I have both. The Surefire has a better and more uniform light beam and spot, but for half the price, the Scorpion is a little brighter and replacement bulbs cost less. However, at distance, the more uniform light of the Surefire seems to out perform the Scorpion's light. So each has some advantages and disadvantages and in the final analysis, I see them is being about comparable....but you are technically correct that the Scorpion is a little brighter, but it doesn't broadcast the light as well and the beam isn't as uniform.
With all that said, my point wasn't to debate a Scorpion versus a Surefire, but to point out that the Beast, at the supposed 160 candlepower, can't be debated about its light producing ability when trying to compared lumens to candlepower. According to candlepower, my $30 Scorpion light is brighter and more power than the Beast. I just don't see that happening. After all, it is not brighter than my Surefire lights rated at 125 lumens, which would only be about 10-11 candlepower, according to the math.
My point, mixed comparisons of candlepower and lumens just is not reasonable.