America is spending lots of cash on the xm8 which is essentially a g36 as far as I can see. Why didn’t they go with the g36?
To be intelectually honest here, we are spending lots more on the Stryker that nobodoy wants and we spent thousands of times as much developing the Comanche which nobody wanted. The fact is, you are talking to gun people if you think nobody wants them, you are not talking to rank-and-file soldiers. Same with the Stryker and Comanche. Every system has its vocal critics, the XM8 is one of them. Those who have handled and shot the gun all praise it over the M16 by far and over the M4 as well. It is significantly lighter, easier to maintain, and can integrate their greande launcher. The M16 can get lighter, yes, but will never be easier to maintain, will never be more reliable, and will never be as compact, bottom line, no iffs, ands, or buts about it.
Those who are fighting the XM8 have valid arguments, but they IGNORE the biggest arguments against the M16. You can debate till you're blue in the face, but the M16/M4 still: have their recoil spring/buffer system behind the operating system; they still deficate where they eat; and they are still made out of metal. You can't have a modular rifle with the M4. Oh, and to preempt all the XM8ers, by "Moduler" I mean that you can integrate the XM8 with other systems, not that you can put a heavy, hot rail system on and duct-tape gadgets to it. The XM8 is INTENDED as a first step towards a larger system that incorporates a grenade launcher with air-burst grenades. Think it's impossible? Can we say JDAM, JSTARS, and Predator?