They are wrong again

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bruce H

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
1,624
Location
North Mo.
Jury finds gun maker liable in shooting of 7-year-old boy
By FROM STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS
OAKLAND -- An Alameda County jury found a Costa Mesa gun maker partially liable Monday for a 1994 accidental shooting that paralyzed a 7-year-old boy, potentially setting a precedent against gun manufacturers, experts said.
The trial against Bryco Arms and others will continue today when jurors begin deciding whether to award damages to Brandon Maxfield.

The Mendocino County boy was accidentally shot in the jaw with a .38-caliber handgun that a family friend was trying to unload.

The jury found Bryco 10 percent liable after concluding it manufactured a defective firearm. The jury also found negligence among the family friend, the pawn shop that sold the gun and the boy's parents.

If the jury awards damages, then each party may have to pay a percentage of its liability.

"There's literally millions of these guns on the street," said the boy's attorney, Richard Ruggieri.

The gun maker has long hailed itself as a provider of affordable handguns, with sales numbering well over three million. Company officials declined to comment Monday.

Victoria Ni, with Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, said the verdict could ensure gun makers take more pains to improve safety.

"These are junk guns," Ni said. "They admit they sell a bare bones gun without all the bells and whistles, but it's the bells and whistles that make it safe."

I know where i would like to put a few bells and whistles!!!
 
oh good grief it's from Oakland - part of the space colony that is San Francisco - it'll go to appeal, that's all.
 
Ehhhh...this suit isn't like the others. It may indeed be the most "legitimate" of the gun suits because it appears the gun really WAS defective. Not in terms of "defective because it's a weapon" or "because the maker knew it could be involved in crime", but rather defective because the design sucks - you have to take the internal keylock safety off to unload it, and it appears the ND was a result of that (at least in part).

Compare to the integral locks on a Taurus or S&W. They can be loaded and unloaded while locked.

I don't like this decision but it *only* affects Bryco :rolleyes: and is related only to the design features of the Bryco. It's not an industry killer.
 
It may indeed be the most "legitimate" of the gun suits because it appears the gun really WAS defective.

I'd be very surprised to learn the owner's manual didn't include a warning about the risks involved, and even if there hadn't been, no intelligent, sane person would ever load or unload a gun with finger on trigger.
 
The gun maker has long hailed itself as a provider of affordable handguns, with sales numbering well over three million.
God forbid a company should make an affordable product that would result in a profit!!! I am astonished that they are operating in the black. Shouldn't all companies just give stuff away?

GT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top