I carry a Kimber Custom II. I regard it as perfect, and I will probably be buried with it.
So, when my local shop, (
www.impactguns.com) started carrying Nighthawk, I looked at the price tag, and I was forced to wonder, "What do you get for $2000 in price difference?" In all fairness, those machined aluminum grips feel fantastic, BUT, you can get those for any 1911. (And for reality, I prefer Hogue wrap-arounds for traction when they're wet.) My Kimber is very close to 2" at 25 yards on a ransom rest. The Nighthawk is guaranteed 1" FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO CAN SHOOT WELL ENOUGH TO MAKE THAT DIFFERENCE IN REAL LIFE. When I shot the Nighthawk, I had two stovepipes in 50 rounds. NEVER HAD ONE WITH THE KIMBER. That may be because I was shooting a rental gun, but it happened nonetheless.
Some people have made a big deal out of MIM parts on lesser-priced guns. I am forced to ask, what the heck are you doing to make those parts fail that LAPD SWAT didn't do in their trials?
The parts list for both guns is exactly the same. The fit and assembly is up to the guy who put it together. If it's iffy either way, (and I'm not at all convinced it is,) I would prefer to spend $630 on a Kimber, instead of $2700 on the Nighthawk. If I'm going to carry it daily, hunting, and in the open whenever I'm outdoors, which one am I more likely to use correctly, the one I am afraid to scratch?
Is there a 1911 worth $2500 plus? I suppose any gun is worth what anyone is willing to pay for it. Shooting them both blind, not Mrs. Deckard's boy.